| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.70e-7 per prompt token | $3.00e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 8 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA), a fine-grained sparse attention mechanism that selectively attends to relevant tokens rather than computing full quadratic attention across all positions. This reduces computational complexity from O(n²) to approximately O(n log n) while maintaining reasoning quality, enabling efficient processing of longer contexts without proportional memory overhead. The sparse pattern is learned during training and dynamically applied based on token importance scoring.
Unique: DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA) uses learned, fine-grained token importance scoring during training to create task-adaptive sparse patterns, rather than fixed sparsity strategies (e.g., local windows or strided patterns) used by competitors. This enables selective attention to semantically relevant tokens across the full sequence.
vs alternatives: Achieves longer effective context windows than Claude 3.5 Sonnet (200K) with lower inference latency due to sparse computation, while maintaining reasoning quality comparable to dense attention models at shorter contexts.
Maintains conversation state across multiple turns, tracking context, user intent, and reasoning chains within a single session. The model processes each turn by incorporating full conversation history, enabling coherent follow-up questions, clarifications, and iterative refinement of responses. State is managed client-side via message arrays passed to the API, with the model internally managing attention over the conversation history using the sparse attention mechanism.
Unique: Combines sparse attention over conversation history with full-sequence reasoning, allowing the model to selectively focus on relevant prior turns rather than equally weighting all history. This reduces noise from early conversation turns while maintaining coherence.
vs alternatives: Handles longer conversation histories (100+ turns) more efficiently than GPT-4 due to sparse attention, reducing per-turn latency and token costs while maintaining context awareness comparable to dense-attention models.
Generates syntactically correct, executable code across multiple programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, Go, Rust, etc.) with reasoning about algorithmic correctness, performance characteristics, and edge cases. The model applies sparse attention to understand full codebase context when provided, enabling generation of code that integrates with existing patterns. Outputs include inline comments, type hints, and error handling appropriate to the target language.
Unique: Uses sparse attention to maintain awareness of full codebase context (imports, class definitions, function signatures) when generating code, enabling generation that respects existing architectural patterns rather than generating in isolation. Sparse patterns learned during training prioritize syntactically relevant tokens (keywords, brackets, indentation).
vs alternatives: Generates code with better architectural coherence than Copilot for large codebases (10K+ lines) due to sparse attention over full context, while maintaining latency comparable to GPT-4 Turbo due to reduced computational overhead.
Performs step-by-step mathematical reasoning including algebraic manipulation, calculus, linear algebra, and logical proofs. The model generates intermediate reasoning steps (chain-of-thought), showing work for complex calculations and deriving conclusions from mathematical premises. Sparse attention enables tracking of long derivations by selectively attending to relevant prior steps rather than all previous tokens.
Unique: Sparse attention over derivation steps allows the model to maintain coherence across long mathematical proofs by selectively attending to relevant prior equations and definitions, rather than treating all previous tokens equally. This enables more accurate multi-step reasoning than dense attention on very long derivations.
vs alternatives: Produces more detailed mathematical reasoning than GPT-4 for complex multi-step problems due to sparse attention enabling longer reasoning chains without context loss, though still lacks symbolic computation capabilities of specialized math engines.
Synthesizes information from long documents or multiple sources into coherent summaries, key insights, and structured knowledge representations. The model uses sparse attention to identify and extract relevant information from lengthy inputs without processing every token equally, enabling efficient summarization of documents up to 100K+ tokens. Outputs include abstractive summaries, bullet-point key findings, and structured data extraction (tables, JSON).
Unique: Sparse attention patterns learned during training prioritize sentences and sections with high information density, enabling the model to extract key insights from 100K+ token documents without proportional computational cost. Sparse patterns adapt to document structure (headings, sections) rather than treating all tokens equally.
vs alternatives: Summarizes documents 2-3x longer than Claude 3.5 Sonnet's practical context limit with lower latency due to sparse computation, while maintaining summary quality comparable to dense-attention models on shorter documents.
Follows complex, multi-step instructions and decomposes ambiguous tasks into concrete subtasks with clear execution plans. The model interprets user intent from natural language instructions, identifies missing information, and generates step-by-step action plans. Sparse attention enables tracking of long instruction sequences by selectively attending to relevant prior steps and constraints.
Unique: Sparse attention over instruction sequences allows the model to maintain awareness of constraints and dependencies across long task descriptions without equal weighting of all tokens. Sparse patterns prioritize constraint keywords and task boundaries identified during training.
vs alternatives: Decomposes complex tasks with longer instruction contexts (50K+ tokens) more accurately than GPT-4 due to sparse attention reducing noise from verbose context, while maintaining planning quality comparable to dense-attention models on typical task lengths.
Generates original creative content including stories, poetry, marketing copy, and dialogue with coherent narrative structure, character consistency, and stylistic variation. The model maintains narrative context across long passages using sparse attention, enabling generation of novel-length content without losing plot coherence. Outputs respect specified tone, genre, and structural constraints.
Unique: Sparse attention patterns learned on narrative data prioritize plot-relevant tokens (character names, key events, emotional beats) over filler text, enabling the model to maintain narrative coherence across longer passages than dense-attention models while using less computation.
vs alternatives: Generates longer coherent narratives (10K+ tokens) with better plot consistency than GPT-4 due to sparse attention reducing noise from verbose descriptions, while maintaining creative quality comparable to dense-attention models on typical story lengths.
Translates text between 50+ languages with context-aware semantic accuracy, preserving tone, idioms, and cultural nuances. The model performs cross-lingual reasoning by understanding concepts across languages and generating responses in target languages. Sparse attention enables efficient processing of long multilingual documents by selectively attending to language-relevant tokens rather than processing all tokens equally.
Unique: Sparse attention patterns adapt to language-specific token distributions, enabling efficient processing of morphologically rich languages (German, Finnish) and languages with different token boundaries (Chinese, Japanese) without proportional computational overhead.
vs alternatives: Translates longer documents (100K+ tokens) more efficiently than Google Translate API with comparable semantic accuracy, while maintaining context awareness across language boundaries better than phrase-based translation systems.
+1 more capabilities
Generates natural language responses mimicking Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus writing style through fine-tuning on Qwen2.5 72B base model. Uses instruction-tuned architecture to follow complex multi-step prompts while maintaining coherent, well-structured prose with appropriate tone and formality levels. The model learns stylistic patterns from Claude outputs during fine-tuning rather than using retrieval or prompt engineering alone.
Unique: Fine-tuned specifically on Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus output patterns rather than generic instruction-tuning, creating a style-matched alternative that preserves Anthropic's prose characteristics while running on Qwen2.5's 72B architecture
vs alternatives: Offers Claude-quality writing at lower cost than Anthropic's API and with more deployment flexibility than proprietary models, though with less transparency about training methodology than fully open-source alternatives like Llama
Maintains coherent multi-turn dialogue through transformer-based attention mechanisms that track conversation history and speaker context. The instruction-tuned architecture processes entire conversation threads as input, allowing the model to reference previous exchanges, maintain consistent character/tone, and resolve pronouns and references across turns without explicit memory structures.
Unique: Inherits Qwen2.5's instruction-tuning approach to conversation, which explicitly trains on multi-turn formats with clear role markers, enabling better context resolution than models trained primarily on single-turn examples
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than systems requiring external memory stores (RAG, vector DBs) since context is handled natively, but less sophisticated than models with explicit memory architectures or retrieval-augmented approaches for very long conversations
Both DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Magnum v4 72B offer these capabilities:
Generates creative text including stories, essays, marketing copy, and other original content by learning stylistic patterns from Claude's creative outputs. The model uses transformer attention to maintain narrative coherence, character consistency, and thematic development across generated text. Fine-tuning captures Claude's approach to balancing creativity with clarity.
Magnum v4 72B scores higher at 25/100 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Generates code snippets and technical explanations by applying instruction-tuned patterns learned from fine-tuning on Claude outputs. The model understands code context from natural language descriptions, can generate multiple programming languages, and provides explanations alongside code. Implementation relies on transformer attention over code tokens and learned associations between natural language intent and code patterns.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's code generation outputs, capturing Anthropic's approach to code explanation and safety considerations (e.g., error handling suggestions) rather than pure code-to-code translation
vs alternatives: Provides better code explanations and safety context than specialized code models like CodeLlama, but likely slower and less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on code-only datasets
Applies learned chain-of-thought reasoning patterns from Claude fine-tuning to break down complex problems into steps. The model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, using transformer attention to track logical dependencies across reasoning chains. This is achieved through instruction-tuning on examples where Claude explicitly shows reasoning work.
Unique: Inherits Claude's explicit chain-of-thought training approach, which emphasizes showing reasoning work as part of the output rather than reasoning internally, making reasoning patterns visible and auditable
vs alternatives: More transparent reasoning than models without explicit chain-of-thought training, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on mathematical reasoning datasets or formal logic
Condenses long-form text into summaries while preserving key information, using attention mechanisms to identify salient content and instruction-tuned patterns for summary formatting. The model learns from Claude's summarization style, which emphasizes clarity and hierarchical organization of information. Works by attending to important tokens and generating compressed representations.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's summarization outputs, which emphasize hierarchical structure and clear topic organization rather than extractive summarization, producing more readable abstracts
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and readability than extractive summarization tools, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on summarization tasks or using dedicated abstractive architectures
Executes complex, multi-part instructions by parsing task structure and maintaining execution context across steps. The instruction-tuned architecture learns to identify task boundaries, handle conditional logic (if-then patterns), and sequence operations correctly. Implementation relies on transformer attention to track task state and learned patterns from Claude's instruction-following training.
Unique: Trained on Claude's instruction-following patterns, which emphasize explicit acknowledgment of task structure and step-by-step execution reporting, making task progress transparent
vs alternatives: More reliable instruction-following than base models without instruction-tuning, but less specialized than models with explicit task planning architectures or reinforcement learning from human feedback on instruction compliance
Answers questions by understanding context, identifying relevant information, and generating coherent responses. Uses transformer attention to locate answer-relevant tokens and instruction-tuned patterns to format responses appropriately. The model learns from Claude's question-answering style, which emphasizes accuracy, nuance, and acknowledgment of uncertainty.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's QA outputs, which emphasize acknowledging uncertainty, providing nuanced answers, and explaining reasoning rather than simple factual retrieval
vs alternatives: Better answer quality and nuance than retrieval-based QA systems, but without external knowledge bases or web search, limited to training data knowledge unlike RAG-augmented systems
Generates creative text including stories, essays, marketing copy, and other original content by learning stylistic patterns from Claude's creative outputs. The model uses transformer attention to maintain narrative coherence, character consistency, and thematic development across generated text. Fine-tuning captures Claude's approach to balancing creativity with clarity.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's creative outputs, which balance imaginative storytelling with clarity and coherence, producing more readable creative content than models trained purely on internet text
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and narrative coherence than base language models, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on creative writing datasets or with explicit story structure training