| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Captures error diagnostics from VS Code's native error/warning system (linter output, compiler diagnostics) and exports them to clipboard via keyboard shortcut (Ctrl+Shift+E). Integrates with VS Code's diagnostic API to detect the most recent error at cursor position or in active editor, formats it with metadata (line number, column, error code), and copies to system clipboard for sharing or documentation. No local processing required—purely a clipboard bridge between VS Code's error system and user's clipboard.
Unique: Directly integrates with VS Code's native diagnostic API rather than parsing error output from terminal or debug console, ensuring 100% accuracy of error detection across all linters and language servers without regex fragility
vs alternatives: Faster and more reliable than manual copy-paste because it hooks into VS Code's structured diagnostic system rather than relying on text parsing or terminal output scraping
Sends captured error message plus surrounding code context (user-selectable scope: snippet or full file) to a cloud-based AI backend via HTTPS. The backend analyzes the error using an undisclosed LLM model, generates a natural-language explanation of the root cause, and produces a ready-to-apply code fix with a confidence score (stated as 85%+). Returns structured response containing explanation, fix, and confidence metric. Triggered via 'Fix with AI' hover action or command palette command.
Unique: Integrates error analysis and fix generation into VS Code's hover UI with confidence scoring and one-click application, rather than requiring context-switching to a separate web interface or chat window. Uses VS Code's diagnostic system as the source of truth for error detection, eliminating false positives from terminal parsing.
vs alternatives: Tighter VS Code integration than ChatGPT or Copilot Chat because it auto-captures error context and applies fixes directly to the editor without manual prompt engineering or copy-paste steps
Registers multiple commands with VS Code's command palette (accessible via Ctrl+Shift+P), including 'ErrorClipper: Fix Error with AI', 'ErrorClipper: Show Error History', 'ErrorClipper: Enter License Key', 'ErrorClipper: View Pricing Plans', and 'ErrorClipper: What's New'. Commands are discoverable via fuzzy search in the command palette, allowing users to find features without memorizing keyboard shortcuts or menu locations. Commands are context-aware: some (e.g., 'Fix Error with AI') only appear when an error is present.
Unique: Registers ErrorClipper commands in VS Code's command palette, making features discoverable via fuzzy search without requiring users to memorize keyboard shortcuts or navigate menus. Includes utility commands like 'View Pricing Plans' and 'What's New' for in-editor feature discovery.
vs alternatives: More discoverable than keyboard shortcuts alone because the command palette provides a searchable interface, allowing users to find commands by partial name without memorizing exact shortcuts
Provides UI localization for 6 languages: English, Simplified Chinese, Spanish, German, and French. Localization includes error messages, button labels, command names, and help text. Language is automatically detected from VS Code's UI language setting (e.g., 'en', 'zh-cn', 'es', 'de', 'fr'). If the user's language is not supported, the extension defaults to English. Localization is applied at extension startup and does not require a restart to take effect.
Unique: Automatically detects and applies localization based on VS Code's UI language setting, eliminating the need for users to manually configure language preferences. Supports 6 languages natively, covering major developer populations.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than extensions that default to English only because it adapts to the user's VS Code language setting without requiring configuration, making the extension accessible to non-English speakers
Applies AI-generated code fixes directly to the active editor file via VS Code's TextEdit API. Parses the suggested fix (returned from AI backend) and inserts it at the error location, replacing the erroneous code. Integrates with VS Code's undo/redo stack, allowing users to revert applied fixes with Ctrl+Z. No file save is automatic—users must manually save (Ctrl+S) to persist changes.
Unique: Applies fixes directly to the editor buffer via VS Code's TextEdit API with full undo/redo integration, rather than generating a separate patch file or diff that users must manually review and apply. Leverages VS Code's native editing model for seamless UX.
vs alternatives: More integrated than GitHub Copilot's fix suggestions because it applies changes directly to the editor without requiring manual acceptance dialogs or copy-paste, reducing friction in the fix workflow
Maintains a local, in-memory or file-based history of all errors encountered during the current VS Code session (or across sessions if persistence is enabled). Accessible via keyboard shortcut (Ctrl+Shift+H) or command palette, which opens a sidebar panel displaying past errors with timestamps, file locations, and error messages. Users can click on any historical error to jump to that location in the editor or re-trigger AI fix generation for that error. History is scoped to the current workspace.
Unique: Integrates error history into VS Code's sidebar as a first-class panel rather than requiring a separate window or web dashboard, making historical error context immediately accessible during editing without context-switching
vs alternatives: More discoverable than VS Code's native Problems panel because it persists errors across file changes and provides chronological ordering, whereas the Problems panel only shows current errors in the workspace
Manages user authentication and subscription tier via a license key system. Users enter a license key via command palette command 'ErrorClipper: Enter License Key', which is validated against the extension's backend service. The backend returns tier information (Free, Starter, Pro) and remaining quota for the current billing period. Quota is enforced client-side: each AI fix request decrements the remaining quota counter, and requests are rejected if quota is exhausted. Tier information is cached locally in VS Code's extension storage (encrypted via VS Code's SecretStorage API).
Unique: Implements quota enforcement at the client-side via cached tier information and local quota counters, reducing backend load compared to server-side enforcement. Uses VS Code's SecretStorage API for encrypted key storage, ensuring license keys are not stored in plaintext on disk.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than per-API-call billing (like OpenAI) because it provides predictable monthly costs and allows users to plan their usage within a fixed quota, rather than being surprised by overage charges
Automatically detects the programming language of the active editor file using VS Code's language mode API (e.g., 'typescript', 'python', 'java'). Sends the detected language as metadata to the AI backend, which uses it to select language-specific error analysis models or prompt templates. Supports TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Java, Go, and Rust natively; unsupported languages return an error message in the UI. Language detection is automatic and requires no user configuration.
Unique: Leverages VS Code's native language mode system for automatic language detection, eliminating the need for users to manually specify language context. Sends language metadata to backend, enabling language-specific AI models without exposing model selection to users.
vs alternatives: More seamless than ChatGPT or Copilot Chat because language context is inferred automatically from the editor state, whereas those tools require users to explicitly mention the language in their prompt
+4 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs ErrorClipper at 28/100. ErrorClipper leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities