| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes ESLint's linting engine as an MCP server, allowing remote clients (Claude, other LLM agents, or tools) to invoke ESLint rule checking and code analysis over the MCP protocol. The server wraps ESLint's core linting API and translates rule violations into structured MCP resource/tool responses, enabling stateless, request-response linting without direct filesystem access from the client.
Unique: Bridges ESLint (a mature, widely-adopted linting tool) into the MCP ecosystem, enabling AI agents and remote tools to invoke linting without direct filesystem access or subprocess spawning. Uses MCP's resource/tool abstraction to expose ESLint's linting API as a standardized remote service.
vs alternatives: Provides centralized, MCP-native linting for AI agents (vs. agents spawning ESLint subprocesses or calling ESLint via REST APIs), with full access to ESLint's rule ecosystem and configuration system.
Exposes ESLint rule definitions, descriptions, and documentation links as MCP resources or tools, allowing clients to query rule metadata without parsing ESLint's internal rule registry. The server introspects the loaded ESLint ruleset and surfaces rule names, descriptions, categories, and documentation URLs for use in AI-assisted code review or rule recommendation workflows.
Unique: Exposes ESLint's internal rule registry as queryable MCP resources, allowing clients to introspect rule definitions without parsing ESLint source code or documentation. Integrates with ESLint 9.x's flat config system to surface rule metadata dynamically.
vs alternatives: Provides programmatic access to rule metadata via MCP (vs. hardcoding rule descriptions or scraping ESLint docs), ensuring metadata stays in sync with the actual ESLint version running in the server.
Invokes ESLint's built-in auto-fix mechanism to automatically correct code violations where rules provide fix implementations. The server applies fixes to code strings or files, returns the corrected code, and optionally provides structured fix suggestions (before/after diffs, rule applied, confidence level) for client-side review or approval workflows.
Unique: Wraps ESLint's fix API in an MCP-accessible interface, allowing remote clients to request and apply fixes without spawning ESLint processes. Integrates with ESLint 9.x's rule fix system and provides structured fix metadata for client-side approval workflows.
vs alternatives: Enables AI agents to apply ESLint fixes as part of a larger workflow (vs. agents manually rewriting code or calling ESLint CLI), with full access to ESLint's fix implementations and the ability to preview fixes before applying them.
Accepts multiple code files or file paths in a single MCP request and returns aggregated linting results across all files. The server batches ESLint invocations, deduplicates configuration loading, and returns structured results grouped by file, enabling efficient bulk code analysis for large codebases or multi-file refactoring workflows.
Unique: Batches ESLint invocations to analyze multiple files in a single MCP request, reducing overhead vs. individual file requests. Aggregates results with file-level grouping and summary statistics for efficient bulk analysis.
vs alternatives: More efficient than making separate MCP requests per file (reduces network round-trips and server startup overhead), while providing structured aggregation suitable for dashboards or bulk refactoring workflows.
Automatically discovers and loads ESLint configuration files (.eslintrc.js, eslint.config.js, or package.json eslintConfig) from the server's working directory and validates the configuration for syntax errors or invalid rule options. The server exposes the loaded configuration as MCP resources, allowing clients to query which rules are enabled, their severity levels, and any configuration errors.
Unique: Exposes ESLint's configuration discovery and validation as MCP resources, allowing clients to introspect the active rule set without parsing config files manually. Integrates with ESLint 9.x's flat config system and legacy config support.
vs alternatives: Provides programmatic access to ESLint configuration via MCP (vs. clients parsing config files themselves or calling ESLint CLI with --print-config), ensuring config state is consistent with the server's linting behavior.
Supports linting of multiple languages (JavaScript, TypeScript, JSX, TSX) by leveraging ESLint's parser and plugin system. The server loads configured parsers (e.g., @typescript-eslint/parser) and plugins (e.g., @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin) from the server environment, enabling language-specific rule checking and type-aware linting for TypeScript code.
Unique: Leverages ESLint 9.x's flat config system and plugin architecture to support multiple languages and type-aware linting. Integrates with @typescript-eslint and other language-specific plugins without requiring client-side parser installation.
vs alternatives: Provides type-aware linting for TypeScript via MCP (vs. clients running separate TypeScript linters or ESLint CLI with complex config), with full access to the @typescript-eslint rule ecosystem.
Automatically loads and parses documents from diverse sources (PDFs, Word docs, HTML, Markdown, code files, databases) into a unified in-memory representation using format-specific loaders and node-based document abstractions. Each document is decomposed into Document objects containing metadata, content, and relationships, enabling downstream processing without format-specific handling in application code.
Unique: Provides a unified loader abstraction (BaseReader interface) that normalizes 100+ data source connectors into a single Document/Node API, eliminating format-specific branching logic in application code. Loaders are composable and chainable, allowing sequential transformations (e.g., load → split → extract metadata → embed).
vs alternatives: Broader out-of-the-box loader coverage than LangChain's document loaders and more structured node-based decomposition than raw text splitting, reducing boilerplate for multi-source RAG pipelines.
Splits documents into semantically coherent chunks using multiple strategies (character-based, token-aware, recursive, semantic) with configurable overlap and chunk size. Preserves document hierarchy and metadata through a node tree structure, enabling retrieval systems to maintain context relationships and enable hierarchical re-ranking or parent-document retrieval patterns.
Unique: Implements a node-tree abstraction that preserves document hierarchy and enables parent-document retrieval patterns. Supports multiple splitting strategies (recursive, semantic, code-aware) with pluggable custom splitters, and automatically propagates metadata through the node tree.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than LangChain's text splitters because it preserves hierarchical relationships and supports semantic splitting; better for complex document structures than simple character-based splitting.
LlamaIndex scores higher at 40/100 vs @eslint/mcp at 35/100. @eslint/mcp leads on adoption and ecosystem, while LlamaIndex is stronger on quality. However, @eslint/mcp offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Processes documents containing mixed content (text, images, tables, code) by extracting and understanding each modality separately, then synthesizing information across modalities. Uses vision models for image understanding, specialized parsers for tables and code, and integrates results into a unified document representation for retrieval and generation.
Unique: Integrates vision models, table parsers, and code extractors into a unified multi-modal document processing pipeline that synthesizes information across modalities. Preserves modality-specific structure (table schemas, code formatting) while enabling cross-modal retrieval and generation.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive multi-modal support than text-only RAG; built-in vision integration reduces boilerplate for document understanding compared to manual vision API calls.
Enables streaming of LLM responses token-by-token and real-time retrieval updates, allowing applications to display partial results as they become available. Supports streaming from retrieval (progressive document discovery) and generation (token-by-token output) with backpressure handling and cancellation support for responsive user experiences.
Unique: Provides first-class streaming support for both retrieval and generation with automatic backpressure handling and cancellation. Enables progressive result display without custom async/streaming code in application layer.
vs alternatives: More integrated streaming support than manual LLM API streaming; built-in retrieval streaming and backpressure handling reduce complexity compared to custom streaming implementations.
Tracks API costs for LLM calls, embeddings, and other operations with per-query and per-session cost attribution. Provides cost optimization recommendations (e.g., batch processing, model selection, caching) and enables cost-aware query planning to balance quality and expense. Integrates with multiple LLM providers to normalize cost tracking across models.
Unique: Provides automatic cost tracking across multiple LLM providers with per-query attribution and cost optimization recommendations. Integrates with query execution to enable cost-aware planning without manual cost calculation.
vs alternatives: More integrated cost tracking than manual API billing review; built-in optimization recommendations reduce guesswork for cost reduction.
Enables building custom RAG pipelines by composing modular components (retrievers, synthesizers, agents, tools) through a declarative or programmatic API. Supports complex workflows with branching, loops, and conditional logic, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Pipelines are reusable, testable, and can be deployed as APIs or batch jobs.
Unique: Provides a flexible pipeline composition API supporting both declarative and programmatic definitions, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Enables complex workflows with branching and conditional logic without custom orchestration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible pipeline composition than fixed RAG architectures; better workflow support than manual component chaining.
Generates embeddings for documents/nodes using pluggable embedding providers (OpenAI, Hugging Face, local models) and stores them in a unified vector store interface that abstracts over multiple backends (Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, FAISS, Chroma, etc.). The abstraction layer enables switching vector stores without changing application code, and handles batching, retry logic, and metadata indexing.
Unique: Provides a unified VectorStore interface that abstracts 10+ vector database backends, enabling zero-code switching between providers. Handles embedding batching, retry logic, and metadata propagation automatically. Supports both cloud and local embedding models through a pluggable EmbedModel interface.
vs alternatives: Broader vector store coverage and more seamless provider switching than LangChain's vectorstore integrations; better abstraction consistency across backends than using raw vector store SDKs directly.
Retrieves semantically similar documents from vector stores using embedding-based similarity search, with optional re-ranking, filtering, and fusion strategies (hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval). Supports multiple retrieval modes (similarity, MMR, fusion) and enables custom retrieval logic through a pluggable Retriever interface that can combine multiple strategies.
Unique: Implements a pluggable Retriever abstraction supporting multiple retrieval strategies (similarity, MMR, fusion, custom) that can be composed and chained. Built-in support for re-ranking via LLM or cross-encoder, and hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval without custom integration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible retrieval composition than LangChain's retrievers; built-in re-ranking and fusion strategies reduce boilerplate for advanced retrieval pipelines.
+6 more capabilities