Find-A-Domain vs IntelliCode
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | Find-A-Domain | IntelliCode |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | Extension |
| UnfragileRank | 20/100 | 39/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 7 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Queries domain registrar databases and DNS systems to determine whether a domain name is currently available for registration. Implements WHOIS protocol queries and registrar API integrations to check availability status across multiple TLDs, returning immediate availability results with pricing information where available. The capability handles both generic TLDs (.com, .net, .org) and country-code TLDs through a unified query interface.
Unique: Implements MCP protocol integration for domain checking, allowing seamless embedding into AI agent workflows without custom API client code. Uses a unified abstraction layer over multiple registrar WHOIS endpoints and APIs, handling protocol differences transparently.
vs alternatives: Provides domain availability checking as an MCP tool that AI agents can call directly, whereas most domain APIs require custom HTTP client implementations and manual error handling.
Fetches and parses WHOIS records for registered domains, extracting structured information including registrant details, registrar information, nameservers, registration and expiration dates, and DNSSEC status. Implements intelligent parsing of WHOIS response text across different registrar formats (ICANN-compliant, regional variants, and proprietary formats) to normalize output into consistent structured data.
Unique: Provides WHOIS parsing as an MCP tool with automatic format detection and normalization across 50+ registrar response formats, eliminating the need for developers to implement custom WHOIS parsing logic.
vs alternatives: Handles WHOIS format variations automatically through intelligent parsing, whereas generic WHOIS clients return raw text requiring manual post-processing.
Processes multiple domain names in a single request, checking availability and retrieving WHOIS data for each domain while managing rate limits and request parallelization. Implements intelligent batching strategies that respect registrar rate limits (typically 50-200 queries/minute) and returns aggregated results with per-domain status, availability, and metadata in a single structured response.
Unique: Implements intelligent rate-limit-aware batching as an MCP tool, automatically parallelizing requests within registrar constraints and handling partial failures with transparent retry logic.
vs alternatives: Abstracts away rate limiting and batching complexity through MCP, whereas raw WHOIS APIs require developers to implement their own parallelization and backoff strategies.
Queries registrar pricing databases to retrieve current registration, renewal, and transfer costs for domains across different registrars and TLDs. Aggregates pricing from multiple registrars (GoDaddy, Namecheap, Google Domains, etc.) and returns comparative pricing data, identifying the cheapest options and highlighting premium domain pricing where applicable.
Unique: Aggregates pricing from multiple registrar APIs into a unified comparison interface, automatically handling currency conversion and promotional pricing variations across registrars.
vs alternatives: Provides multi-registrar pricing comparison as a single MCP tool call, whereas developers typically need to integrate with each registrar's API separately.
Performs DNS lookups and validation checks on domain configurations, including A/AAAA record resolution, MX record verification, NS record validation, and DNSSEC status checking. Returns detailed diagnostic information about DNS health, identifies misconfigurations, and flags potential issues like missing MX records or DNSSEC failures.
Unique: Provides comprehensive DNS validation as an MCP tool, combining multiple DNS query types (A, AAAA, MX, NS, DNSSEC) into a single diagnostic call with automatic issue detection and remediation suggestions.
vs alternatives: Integrates DNS diagnostics directly into AI agent workflows via MCP, whereas developers typically need to use separate DNS tools (dig, nslookup) and parse results manually.
Provides IntelliSense completions ranked by a machine learning model trained on patterns from thousands of open-source repositories. The model learns which completions are most contextually relevant based on code patterns, variable names, and surrounding context, surfacing the most probable next token with a star indicator in the VS Code completion menu. This differs from simple frequency-based ranking by incorporating semantic understanding of code context.
Unique: Uses a neural model trained on open-source repository patterns to rank completions by likelihood rather than simple frequency or alphabetical ordering; the star indicator explicitly surfaces the top recommendation, making it discoverable without scrolling
vs alternatives: Faster than Copilot for single-token completions because it leverages lightweight ranking rather than full generative inference, and more transparent than generic IntelliSense because starred recommendations are explicitly marked
Ingests and learns from patterns across thousands of open-source repositories across Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, and Java to build a statistical model of common code patterns, API usage, and naming conventions. This model is baked into the extension and used to contextualize all completion suggestions. The learning happens offline during model training; the extension itself consumes the pre-trained model without further learning from user code.
Unique: Explicitly trained on thousands of public repositories to extract statistical patterns of idiomatic code; this training is transparent (Microsoft publishes which repos are included) and the model is frozen at extension release time, ensuring reproducibility and auditability
vs alternatives: More transparent than proprietary models because training data sources are disclosed; more focused on pattern matching than Copilot, which generates novel code, making it lighter-weight and faster for completion ranking
IntelliCode scores higher at 39/100 vs Find-A-Domain at 20/100. IntelliCode also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Analyzes the immediate code context (variable names, function signatures, imported modules, class scope) to rank completions contextually rather than globally. The model considers what symbols are in scope, what types are expected, and what the surrounding code is doing to adjust the ranking of suggestions. This is implemented by passing a window of surrounding code (typically 50-200 tokens) to the inference model along with the completion request.
Unique: Incorporates local code context (variable names, types, scope) into the ranking model rather than treating each completion request in isolation; this is done by passing a fixed-size context window to the neural model, enabling scope-aware ranking without full semantic analysis
vs alternatives: More accurate than frequency-based ranking because it considers what's in scope; lighter-weight than full type inference because it uses syntactic context and learned patterns rather than building a complete type graph
Integrates ranked completions directly into VS Code's native IntelliSense menu by adding a star (★) indicator next to the top-ranked suggestion. This is implemented as a custom completion item provider that hooks into VS Code's CompletionItemProvider API, allowing IntelliCode to inject its ranked suggestions alongside built-in language server completions. The star is a visual affordance that makes the recommendation discoverable without requiring the user to change their completion workflow.
Unique: Uses VS Code's CompletionItemProvider API to inject ranked suggestions directly into the native IntelliSense menu with a star indicator, avoiding the need for a separate UI panel or modal and keeping the completion workflow unchanged
vs alternatives: More seamless than Copilot's separate suggestion panel because it integrates into the existing IntelliSense menu; more discoverable than silent ranking because the star makes the recommendation explicit
Maintains separate, language-specific neural models trained on repositories in each supported language (Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, Java). Each model is optimized for the syntax, idioms, and common patterns of its language. The extension detects the file language and routes completion requests to the appropriate model. This allows for more accurate recommendations than a single multi-language model because each model learns language-specific patterns.
Unique: Trains and deploys separate neural models per language rather than a single multi-language model, allowing each model to specialize in language-specific syntax, idioms, and conventions; this is more complex to maintain but produces more accurate recommendations than a generalist approach
vs alternatives: More accurate than single-model approaches like Copilot's base model because each language model is optimized for its domain; more maintainable than rule-based systems because patterns are learned rather than hand-coded
Executes the completion ranking model on Microsoft's servers rather than locally on the user's machine. When a completion request is triggered, the extension sends the code context and cursor position to Microsoft's inference service, which runs the model and returns ranked suggestions. This approach allows for larger, more sophisticated models than would be practical to ship with the extension, and enables model updates without requiring users to download new extension versions.
Unique: Offloads model inference to Microsoft's cloud infrastructure rather than running locally, enabling larger models and automatic updates but requiring internet connectivity and accepting privacy tradeoffs of sending code context to external servers
vs alternatives: More sophisticated models than local approaches because server-side inference can use larger, slower models; more convenient than self-hosted solutions because no infrastructure setup is required, but less private than local-only alternatives
Learns and recommends common API and library usage patterns from open-source repositories. When a developer starts typing a method call or API usage, the model ranks suggestions based on how that API is typically used in the training data. For example, if a developer types `requests.get(`, the model will rank common parameters like `url=` and `timeout=` based on frequency in the training corpus. This is implemented by training the model on API call sequences and parameter patterns extracted from the training repositories.
Unique: Extracts and learns API usage patterns (parameter names, method chains, common argument values) from open-source repositories, allowing the model to recommend not just what methods exist but how they are typically used in practice
vs alternatives: More practical than static documentation because it shows real-world usage patterns; more accurate than generic completion because it ranks by actual usage frequency in the training data