| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Provides a unified model discovery interface within VS Code that aggregates models from 8+ sources (Microsoft Foundry, GitHub Models, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, NVIDIA NIM, Ollama, ONNX) with side-by-side comparison capabilities. The extension maintains a tree view in the sidebar with a 'Model Catalog' section that dynamically populates available models based on configured API keys and local installations, enabling developers to evaluate and select models without leaving the editor.
Unique: Aggregates models from 8+ heterogeneous sources (proprietary APIs, local runtimes, open-source registries) into a single VS Code sidebar tree view with unified comparison UI, rather than requiring separate tools or browser tabs for each provider
vs alternatives: Eliminates context-switching between provider dashboards and local model managers by centralizing discovery in the development environment where models will be used
Provides an embedded chat interface within VS Code for real-time model testing and prompt experimentation. The playground supports multi-modal inputs (text, images, attachments), parameter tuning (temperature, top-p, max tokens), and streaming response visualization. Developers can test prompts against any model in the catalog without leaving the editor, with full parameter control and response inspection.
Unique: Embeds a full-featured chat playground directly in VS Code sidebar with streaming response visualization and parameter controls, avoiding the need to switch to web-based model playgrounds (OpenAI Playground, Claude Console) or separate tools
vs alternatives: Keeps prompt iteration in the development environment with instant feedback and parameter tuning, reducing context-switching compared to web-based playgrounds or API-only workflows
Enables agents to route requests to multiple models simultaneously or sequentially, compare outputs, and select the best response based on custom criteria. The extension provides orchestration patterns (parallel execution, fallback chains, ensemble voting) and comparison metrics (similarity, relevance, cost) to help developers optimize agent behavior. Results from all models are captured and compared in the debugger.
Unique: Provides built-in multi-model orchestration patterns (parallel, fallback, ensemble) with comparison and selection logic directly in the agent framework, rather than requiring custom orchestration code or external frameworks
vs alternatives: Simplifies multi-model agent development by providing pre-built orchestration patterns compared to manual implementation or external orchestration frameworks
Manages agent deployment to Microsoft Foundry and other hosting environments, including versioning, rollback, and environment configuration. Developers can deploy agents directly from VS Code, manage multiple versions, configure environment-specific settings (API keys, model selections), and monitor deployed agent health. The extension handles deployment packaging and orchestrates the deployment process.
Unique: Integrates agent deployment and lifecycle management directly in VS Code with version control and environment configuration, rather than requiring separate deployment tools or cloud console access
vs alternatives: Keeps agent deployment in the development environment with built-in versioning and rollback, compared to manual deployment or external CI/CD tools
Provides dual-mode agent development: a no-code prompt-based agent builder for simple workflows and a code-based hosted agent framework for complex multi-step agents. Both modes support structured output generation (JSON schemas, typed responses) and integrate with the debugger for real-time execution visualization. The builder abstracts away boilerplate agent scaffolding while maintaining full code access for advanced customization.
Unique: Combines no-code prompt-based agent builder for simple cases with full code-based framework for complex agents, allowing users to start simple and graduate to code without tool switching, rather than forcing choice between low-code platforms (no code access) or pure SDKs (no visual builder)
vs alternatives: Bridges the gap between low-code platforms (limited customization) and pure SDKs (high friction for simple cases) by offering both modes in one tool with seamless transition between them
Provides F5-based debugger integration for agent execution with real-time streaming response visualization and multi-agent workflow inspection. When launching an agent with F5, the extension captures execution traces, tool calls, and model responses, displaying them in a structured timeline view within VS Code. Developers can inspect intermediate states, tool invocations, and response generation without external logging or debugging tools.
Unique: Integrates agent debugging directly into VS Code's F5 debugger with streaming response visualization and multi-agent workflow inspection, rather than requiring separate logging frameworks, external dashboards, or print-based debugging
vs alternatives: Provides native VS Code debugging experience for agents (similar to traditional code debugging) instead of requiring external observability tools or custom logging, reducing setup friction and keeping debugging in the IDE
Enables systematic model evaluation against datasets using a combination of built-in evaluators (F1 score, relevance, similarity, coherence) and custom evaluation criteria. Developers upload or reference datasets, define evaluation metrics, and run batch evaluations across models to compare performance. Results are displayed in a structured comparison view with metrics aggregation and per-sample analysis.
Unique: Provides built-in evaluators (F1, relevance, similarity, coherence) with custom metric support directly in VS Code, avoiding the need for separate evaluation frameworks (LangChain Evaluators, Ragas, DeepEval) or manual metric implementation
vs alternatives: Integrates model evaluation into the development workflow with pre-built metrics and custom extensibility, reducing setup time compared to standalone evaluation frameworks that require separate Python environments and configuration
Enables fine-tuning of models on local GPU hardware or via Azure Container Apps for cloud-based training. The extension abstracts away training infrastructure setup, handling data preparation, training loop orchestration, and model checkpointing. Developers specify a dataset, select a base model, configure training parameters (learning rate, epochs, batch size), and launch training either locally or in the cloud with progress monitoring within VS Code.
Unique: Abstracts local GPU training and cloud fine-tuning (Azure Container Apps) behind a unified VS Code UI, with automatic fallback from local to cloud, rather than requiring separate training scripts, infrastructure setup, or cloud console access
vs alternatives: Eliminates training infrastructure setup friction by providing one-click fine-tuning with local GPU or cloud fallback, compared to manual training scripts or cloud-only platforms that require separate environments
+4 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs Foundry Toolkit for VS Code at 44/100. Foundry Toolkit for VS Code leads on adoption and ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities