| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | Custom | — |
| Capabilities | 15 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Detects factual inconsistencies and fabricated information in LLM-generated responses by analyzing semantic coherence between model outputs and source context. Uses research-backed metrics to identify when models generate plausible-sounding but unsupported claims, with real-time flagging of hallucination patterns across production traffic without requiring manual annotation.
Unique: Integrates hallucination detection as a first-class metric in production observability pipelines rather than as a post-hoc analysis tool, enabling real-time alerting on hallucination spikes across 100% of traffic with Luna model-based evaluation at claimed 97% lower cost than LLM-as-judge approaches
vs alternatives: Detects hallucinations in production at scale with real-time alerting, whereas competitors like Arize focus on statistical drift detection and most RAG frameworks lack built-in hallucination metrics
Measures how well LLM responses stay grounded in and utilize the retrieved context documents, scoring the degree of semantic alignment between generated answers and source material. Evaluates whether the model is actually using provided context versus relying on parametric knowledge, with scoring that can be customized per use case and tracked across retrieval quality improvements.
Unique: Treats context adherence as a first-class observability metric integrated into production monitoring dashboards rather than a batch evaluation metric, enabling real-time detection of when retrieval quality degrades and impacts answer grounding
vs alternatives: Provides context-specific grounding metrics whereas generic LLM evaluation platforms like Weights & Biases focus on output quality without measuring retrieval utilization
Analyzes millions of signals across traces to identify recurring failure patterns (e.g., 'date-based queries fail 40% of the time', 'tool selection fails when context exceeds 5K tokens') and generates prescriptive recommendations for fixes (e.g., 'Add few-shot examples to demonstrate correct tool input'). Uses pattern recognition across models, prompts, functions, context, and datasets to surface hidden issues.
Unique: Combines failure pattern detection with prescriptive recommendations in a single analysis, rather than requiring separate tools for anomaly detection (statistical) and root cause analysis (manual)
vs alternatives: Provides prescriptive recommendations for LLM/RAG failures whereas generic observability platforms (Datadog, New Relic) offer only statistical anomaly detection without semantic understanding of LLM-specific failure modes
Offers deployment flexibility for Enterprise customers with hosted (default), VPC (private cloud), and on-premises deployment options. Enables organizations with strict data residency, compliance, or security requirements to run Galileo observability infrastructure in their own environments while maintaining access to Luna models and evaluation capabilities.
Unique: Offers VPC and on-premises deployment options for Enterprise customers, enabling data residency compliance while maintaining access to Luna models, whereas competitors like Arize are cloud-only
vs alternatives: Provides deployment flexibility for regulated industries and data-sensitive organizations, but requires Enterprise tier and custom deployment support
Blocks unsafe or low-quality LLM outputs in real-time before they reach users, using Luna models and evaluation logic to detect issues and trigger guardrail actions. Available on Enterprise tier with dedicated low-latency inference servers, enabling sub-second evaluation and blocking decisions for production traffic.
Unique: Provides real-time output blocking with Luna models on dedicated inference servers, enabling sub-second guardrail decisions without external API calls, whereas competitors require external safety APIs (Lakera, Rebuff) that add latency
vs alternatives: Integrates real-time guardrails directly into observability platform with low-latency Luna models, whereas safety-specific platforms like Lakera require separate API calls that add latency and cost
Provides enterprise-grade access control with role-based access control (RBAC), single sign-on (SSO), and comprehensive audit logging for compliance. Enables organizations to manage user permissions, enforce authentication policies, and maintain audit trails of all evaluation and monitoring activities for regulatory compliance.
Unique: Integrates RBAC, SSO, and audit logging as first-class features for Enterprise tier, enabling compliance-ready observability for regulated organizations
vs alternatives: Provides enterprise access control and audit logging whereas free/Pro tiers lack these features, and competitors like Arize require separate identity management infrastructure
Tracks and displays the cost of running evaluations, including LLM-as-judge costs (e.g., $0.0733 per run with GPT-4o and 3 judges) and Luna model costs (claimed 97% cheaper). Enables teams to understand evaluation economics and optimize evaluation strategies by comparing cost vs accuracy tradeoffs.
Unique: Provides transparent cost tracking for evaluations and highlights Luna model cost savings (97% cheaper) compared to LLM-as-judge, enabling cost-aware evaluation strategy decisions
vs alternatives: Tracks evaluation costs explicitly whereas competitors like Arize don't provide cost visibility, and Luna models offer dramatic cost savings compared to LLM-as-judge approaches
Evaluates whether retrieved documents are relevant, complete, and sufficient to answer user queries by analyzing retrieval precision/recall and identifying failure modes like missing documents, ranking errors, or semantic gaps. Surfaces patterns in retrieval failures (e.g., 'queries about Q3 financials consistently retrieve Q2 documents') and recommends fixes like embedding model tuning or chunking strategy changes.
Unique: Combines retrieval metrics with automated failure mode detection and prescriptive recommendations in a single observability view, rather than requiring separate retrieval evaluation tools and manual analysis of failure patterns
vs alternatives: Provides failure mode diagnosis and recommendations whereas traditional RAG frameworks offer only basic retrieval metrics, and competitors like Arize lack RAG-specific retrieval quality assessment
+7 more capabilities
Intercepts training loops and model operations through Python SDK monkey-patching of popular frameworks (PyTorch, TensorFlow, scikit-learn, XGBoost) to automatically capture metrics, hyperparameters, gradients, and system resources without explicit logging calls. Uses a Task object that wraps the training context and streams telemetry to a central server in real-time or batched mode.
Unique: Uses framework-level monkey-patching to intercept training operations across PyTorch, TensorFlow, and scikit-learn without requiring code changes, combined with a centralized Task context object that manages metric buffering and async streaming to the server
vs alternatives: Requires zero code changes to existing training scripts unlike Weights & Biases or Neptune, which require explicit logging calls, though this comes at the cost of potential instrumentation conflicts
Manages training datasets as versioned artifacts using content-addressable storage (SHA256-based deduplication) with support for local, S3, GCS, and Azure Blob Storage backends. Tracks dataset lineage, splits, and statistics; enables reproducible training by pinning exact dataset versions to experiments. Integrates with the Task object to automatically associate datasets with experiment runs.
Unique: Implements content-addressable storage with SHA256-based deduplication across datasets, automatically tracking dataset lineage and associating versions with experiments via the Task context, supporting multi-cloud backends (S3, GCS, Azure) with unified API
vs alternatives: Provides tighter integration with experiment tracking than DVC (which is primarily a Git-based versioning tool) and lower operational overhead than Pachyderm (which requires Kubernetes), though lacks DVC's Git-native workflow
ClearML scores higher at 61/100 vs Galileo Observe at 57/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Automatically captures Git repository state (commit hash, branch, uncommitted changes) when a task is initialized, enabling reproducible training by pinning exact code versions. Supports cloning code from Git repositories on remote agents, with automatic dependency installation from requirements.txt or setup.py. Integrates with GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket.
Unique: Automatically captures Git repository state (commit hash, branch, uncommitted changes) and enables remote code cloning with automatic dependency installation, linking code versions to experiment runs for reproducibility
vs alternatives: More integrated with experiment tracking than standalone Git tools, but less flexible than custom CI/CD pipelines for complex dependency management
Provides a flexible API for logging scalar metrics (loss, accuracy, F1 score) and custom scalars with support for multiple series per metric, hierarchical metric organization, and real-time streaming to the server. Metrics are buffered locally and sent in batches to reduce network overhead. Supports custom aggregation functions for combining metrics across distributed training ranks.
Unique: Provides flexible metric logging with hierarchical organization, real-time streaming with local buffering, and custom aggregation functions for distributed training, integrated with the Task context
vs alternatives: More flexible than framework-specific logging (PyTorch TensorBoard), but less standardized than OpenTelemetry for observability
Captures training configurations (hyperparameters, model architecture, data paths) as structured metadata linked to experiments. Supports YAML/JSON configuration files, command-line argument parsing, and programmatic parameter setting via the Task API. Enables parameter overrides at execution time without modifying code, with automatic diff tracking between experiment configurations.
Unique: Captures training configurations as structured metadata with support for YAML/JSON files, command-line arguments, and programmatic setting, enabling parameter overrides and automatic diff tracking between experiments
vs alternatives: More integrated with experiment tracking than standalone configuration management tools (Hydra), though Hydra offers more advanced features like composition and interpolation
Enables querying experiments via flexible filtering on tags, hyperparameters, metrics, date range, and custom metadata. Supports full-text search on experiment names and descriptions. Results can be sorted by metric values (e.g., best validation accuracy) and aggregated (e.g., average metric across runs). Filtering is performed server-side for scalability. Saved filters can be bookmarked for repeated use.
Unique: Provides server-side filtering and full-text search on experiment metadata with sortable results, enabling efficient experiment discovery without client-side filtering or manual browsing
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic search tools; comparable to Weights & Biases experiment search but self-hosted and open-source
Distributes training tasks across a pool of worker machines (agents) using a queue-based dispatch system. Tasks are enqueued with resource requirements (GPU count, memory, CPU cores); agents poll queues and execute tasks in isolated environments with automatic dependency resolution and artifact staging. Supports dynamic resource allocation, priority queuing, and task preemption.
Unique: Implements a lightweight agent-based queue system where workers poll for tasks with declarative resource requirements (GPU count, memory), automatically staging dependencies and artifacts without requiring shared filesystems, supporting dynamic queue prioritization
vs alternatives: Simpler to deploy than Kubernetes-based solutions (Ray, Kubeflow) for small-to-medium clusters, but lacks the auto-scaling and fault-tolerance guarantees of cloud-native orchestrators
Defines machine learning workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) where nodes represent tasks (training, evaluation, preprocessing) and edges represent data/artifact dependencies. Pipelines are defined via Python API or YAML, executed sequentially or in parallel based on dependency graph, with automatic artifact passing between stages and centralized monitoring of pipeline runs.
Unique: Implements DAG-based pipeline orchestration where task dependencies are automatically resolved and artifacts are passed between stages via the Task context, with centralized monitoring and support for both Python API and YAML definitions
vs alternatives: More lightweight than Airflow or Prefect for ML-specific workflows, but lacks their mature scheduling, retry logic, and ecosystem of integrations
+6 more capabilities