| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Crawls and analyzes website content against indexing and retrieval requirements for three distinct AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini) using engine-specific crawling patterns and citation detection algorithms. The scanner likely simulates how each engine's retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline would discover, parse, and rank the site's content, then surfaces visibility gaps specific to each platform's indexing behavior and content preference signals.
Unique: Focuses exclusively on AI search engine indexing and retrieval requirements (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini) rather than traditional Google SEO, requiring engine-specific crawling simulation and citation detection logic that differs fundamentally from Googlebot-centric tools like SEMrush or Ahrefs
vs alternatives: Addresses an emerging SEO reality that traditional platforms ignore; while Semrush and Ahrefs optimize for Google, GEOScore optimizes for the AI search engines that are becoming traffic drivers for content-heavy sites
Executes a fixed set of 11 automated technical checks against the scanned website, likely covering content structure (headings, semantic HTML), indexability signals (robots.txt, meta tags, canonical URLs), citation formatting (author/date/source attribution), content freshness, and mobile responsiveness. Each check is scored as pass/fail or partial, aggregated into a composite visibility score that indicates readiness for AI search engine discovery and ranking.
Unique: Audit checks are specifically calibrated for AI search engine requirements (citation formatting, content structure for RAG pipelines, indexability for non-Google crawlers) rather than generic SEO best practices, requiring domain knowledge of how ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini parse and rank content
vs alternatives: More targeted than Lighthouse or PageSpeed Insights (which focus on performance/UX) and more AI-search-specific than Moz or Ahrefs (which optimize for Google); fills a gap in SEO tooling for an emerging traffic channel
Disaggregates the audit results by AI search engine (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini), surfacing engine-specific optimization gaps and recommendations. This likely involves mapping the 11 technical checks to each engine's known indexing behavior and content preferences (e.g., Perplexity may prioritize fresh content and source attribution differently than ChatGPT), then generating tailored remediation suggestions for each platform.
Unique: Disaggregates visibility and recommendations by AI search engine rather than treating them as a monolithic 'AI search' category, acknowledging that ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini have different indexing behaviors, content preferences, and citation requirements
vs alternatives: More granular than generic 'AI search readiness' scores; enables users to optimize strategically for the engines that matter most to their traffic, rather than applying one-size-fits-all recommendations
Provides a freemium model where users can run one or more full 11-point audits without payment, removing friction for initial discovery and experimentation. The free tier likely includes the core audit and per-engine breakdown but may exclude features like historical tracking, competitive benchmarking, or detailed remediation guidance that are reserved for paid tiers.
Unique: Removes friction for initial discovery by offering a full audit (11 checks, multi-engine breakdown) at no cost, betting that users will upgrade to paid tiers for historical tracking, competitive benchmarking, or ongoing monitoring
vs alternatives: Lower barrier to entry than Semrush or Ahrefs (which require paid subscriptions for any meaningful audit); similar freemium approach to Moz's free SEO tools but specialized for AI search rather than Google
Implements a web crawler that fetches and parses website content using patterns optimized for AI search engine indexing behavior. The crawler likely respects robots.txt and crawl-delay directives, extracts semantic content structure (headings, paragraphs, lists, tables), detects citation metadata (author, date, source), and analyzes content freshness and mobile rendering. Results are stored in a structured format for analysis against the 11-point audit checks.
Unique: Crawling patterns are optimized for AI search engine indexing (e.g., extracting citation metadata, analyzing content structure for RAG pipelines) rather than traditional SEO crawling (e.g., link analysis, keyword density), requiring different parsing logic and metadata extraction
vs alternatives: More specialized than generic web crawlers (Screaming Frog, Semrush) which optimize for Google SEO; focuses on signals that matter for AI search engine discovery and ranking rather than traditional SEO metrics
Monitors brand mentions and citation patterns across 8+ AI platforms (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Grok, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode) by executing custom tracked prompts on a configurable schedule (daily or weekly). Aggregates results into a unified dashboard showing visibility scores, sentiment analysis, and share-of-voice metrics. Uses proprietary query execution infrastructure to maintain consistency across heterogeneous AI platform APIs and response formats.
Unique: Unified monitoring across 8+ heterogeneous AI platforms (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, Grok, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode) with proprietary query execution infrastructure that normalizes responses across different API formats and response structures. Most competitors (Semrush, Ahrefs) focus on traditional Google search; Writesonic's core differentiation is aggregating AI platform visibility as a distinct metric.
vs alternatives: Provides AI search visibility tracking that traditional SEO tools (Semrush, Ahrefs) do not offer; however, lacks the depth of backlink analysis and keyword research that those tools provide, making it complementary rather than a replacement.
Scans website pages (up to 2,500 per audit on Growth plan) using proprietary crawling infrastructure, identifies technical SEO issues (schema, metadata, internal linking, etc.), and generates AI-powered remediation recommendations via LLM analysis. Integrates with Ahrefs and Google Keyword Planner data to contextualize issues within competitive landscape. Recommendations include specific implementation steps (schema fixes, content gaps, internal linking suggestions) that users can execute manually or via the platform's AI agents.
Unique: Combines traditional SEO crawling with LLM-powered remediation recommendation generation, using Ahrefs/Semrush integration to contextualize issues within competitive landscape. Most SEO audit tools (Semrush, Ahrefs, Screaming Frog) identify issues but require manual interpretation; Writesonic's LLM layer generates specific, actionable fix recommendations with implementation context.
Writesonic scores higher at 56/100 vs GEOScore at 41/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Faster time-to-actionable-insights than manual SEO audit interpretation, but less comprehensive than dedicated SEO platforms (Semrush, Ahrefs) for backlink analysis, keyword research depth, and historical trend tracking.
Calculates share-of-voice (SOV) metrics showing what percentage of AI search results mention the user's brand vs competitors. Tracks SOV trends over time to measure competitive positioning. Benchmarks brand visibility against competitor set across all 8 AI platforms. Enables comparison of visibility performance by platform, region, and language. Mechanism for SOV calculation unknown; likely based on citation frequency or result ranking position.
Unique: Calculates share-of-voice specifically for AI search results across 8+ platforms, providing competitive benchmarking in a market (AI search visibility) that traditional SEO tools don't measure. SOV calculation mechanism unknown; may differ from traditional SEO SOV definitions.
vs alternatives: Provides AI search-specific competitive benchmarking that traditional SEO tools (Semrush, Ahrefs) don't offer; however, lacks the depth of traditional SEO SOV analysis (backlinks, keyword rankings, traffic share).
Chatsonic chat interface includes real-time web browsing capability, enabling users to ask questions that require current information (news, market data, product availability, etc.) without relying on training data cutoff. Web search results are fetched on-demand and incorporated into LLM responses. Search freshness and latency not specified. Integrates with Ahrefs, Google Keyword Planner, Semrush, Reddit, and 'People Also Asked' data for prompt diversification (mechanism unknown).
Unique: Integrates real-time web search directly into conversational interface, enabling current-information queries without training data cutoff. Integrates with Ahrefs, Semrush, Reddit, and 'People Also Asked' for prompt diversification (mechanism unknown).
vs alternatives: More integrated than using ChatGPT + separate web search tools because search results are incorporated directly into responses; however, search quality depends on search engine ranking and may not be better than direct Google search for some queries.
Chatsonic chat interface supports file uploads (format support not specified; likely PDF, CSV, XLSX, DOCX, images) for analysis and extraction. Users can ask questions about file contents, request data extraction, summarization, or transformation. Analysis is performed by LLM with file content as context. Output formats not specified; likely text summaries, extracted tables, or structured data.
Unique: Integrates file upload and analysis into conversational interface, enabling natural language queries about file contents without requiring specialized data analysis tools. File format support and analysis quality not documented.
vs alternatives: More accessible than spreadsheet tools (Excel, Google Sheets) for non-technical users; however, less powerful than specialized data analysis tools (Tableau, Python/Pandas) for complex analysis and visualization.
Chatsonic chat interface includes image generation capability powered by ChatGPT Image and Flux 1.1 APIs. Users can request images via natural language prompts; platform generates images and returns them in chat interface. Image generation quality, resolution, and cost implications unknown. Integration with external APIs (ChatGPT Image, Flux 1.1) means generation latency and availability depend on external service reliability.
Unique: Integrates image generation (ChatGPT Image, Flux 1.1) into conversational interface, enabling natural language image requests without leaving chat. Integration with multiple image generation APIs (ChatGPT Image, Flux 1.1) provides fallback options.
vs alternatives: More integrated than using ChatGPT + separate image generation tools; however, image quality likely lower than specialized tools (Midjourney, DALL-E 3) and cost implications unknown.
Generates full-length articles (50/month on Growth plan; unlimited on Enterprise) using GPT-4o or Claude 3.7 Sonnet with built-in SEO optimization including keyword integration, internal linking suggestions, and schema markup recommendations. Supports 10 writing styles on Growth plan (unlimited on Enterprise) and includes fact-checking capability (mechanism unknown). Articles are generated with awareness of competitor content and keyword data from integrated Ahrefs/Google Keyword Planner sources.
Unique: Integrates SEO optimization (keyword placement, internal linking, schema markup) directly into article generation pipeline using GPT-4o/Claude, rather than generating raw content and requiring separate SEO optimization step. Includes awareness of competitor content and keyword data from Ahrefs/Google Keyword Planner to inform content strategy.
vs alternatives: Faster than hiring writers or using generic content generation tools (ChatGPT, Jasper) because SEO optimization is built-in; however, generated articles still require human review and editing, and lack the strategic depth of human-written content or content agencies.
Generates context-aware action recommendations based on visibility tracking and audit data, including outreach templates for citation gap remediation, content gap identification, and technical fix suggestions. Templates are pre-populated with brand-specific context (competitor names, missing citations, technical issues) and can be customized before execution. Tracks action completion and correlates with subsequent visibility/ranking changes.
Unique: Contextualizes recommendations within visibility tracking and audit data, generating pre-populated outreach templates and fix suggestions rather than generic advice. Tracks action completion and correlates with visibility changes, creating a feedback loop for optimization.
vs alternatives: More actionable than raw analytics dashboards (Semrush, Ahrefs) because it generates specific next steps; however, lacks the sophistication of dedicated workflow/CRM tools (HubSpot, Salesforce) for outreach execution and tracking.
+6 more capabilities