| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Automatically locates and parses session logs from Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, and other AI coding tools by scanning platform-specific directories (~/.claude, ~/.config, etc.). Implements a provider plugin system with standardized parsers that convert heterogeneous log formats into a unified ParsedTurn and Session object model, enabling downstream analysis across multiple tools without manual configuration.
Unique: Implements a provider plugin architecture that decouples provider-specific parsing logic from the core analysis engine, allowing new providers to be added via standardized interfaces (discoverAllSessions, parseSessionFile) without modifying core code. Uses LiteLLM's pricing database as the canonical source for model cost data across 100+ models.
vs alternatives: Supports 5+ AI coding tools natively with a pluggable architecture, whereas most token trackers are single-tool specific or require API proxies that add latency and privacy concerns.
Analyzes parsed session turns and classifies them into TaskCategory buckets (coding, testing, terminal usage, debugging, etc.) using heuristic rules based on turn content, tool invocations, and file types. Implements a classifyTurn function that examines API calls, file modifications, and context patterns to assign semantic meaning to raw token consumption, enabling cost breakdown by activity type rather than just by model.
Unique: Uses multi-signal heuristic classification (file types, tool invocations, context patterns) rather than simple keyword matching, enabling semantic understanding of turn purpose. Tracks one-shot success rate per task category to identify which activity types benefit most from AI assistance.
vs alternatives: Provides task-level cost visibility that generic token counters cannot offer, allowing developers to optimize by activity type rather than just by model or project.
Provides CLI commands (codeburn status, codeburn report) that generate detailed reports on session discovery status, parsing errors, and data quality metrics. Implements metadata inspection capabilities that allow developers to examine individual session files, view parsing errors, and understand data completeness. Generates status summaries showing how many sessions were discovered, parsed successfully, and skipped due to errors.
Unique: Provides transparent visibility into the data ingestion pipeline, showing exactly which sessions were discovered, parsed, and skipped with detailed error messages. Enables developers to audit data quality before relying on cost calculations.
vs alternatives: Offers detailed status and error reporting that helps developers understand data completeness, whereas black-box tools that silently skip sessions make it difficult to detect data quality issues.
Implements a plugin-based architecture that allows new AI coding providers to be added without modifying core CodeBurn code. Each provider plugin implements standardized interfaces (discoverAllSessions, parseSessionFile) that return normalized ParsedTurn and Session objects. Plugins are loaded dynamically at runtime and can be distributed as npm packages, enabling community contributions and custom provider support.
Unique: Defines a minimal, standardized plugin interface (discoverAllSessions, parseSessionFile) that decouples provider-specific logic from the core analysis engine, enabling community contributions without core code changes. Plugins are loaded dynamically at runtime.
vs alternatives: Enables extensibility without forking or modifying core code, whereas monolithic tools that hardcode provider support require core maintainers to add each new provider.
Calculates USD costs for each turn by multiplying token counts (input + output) by model-specific pricing rates sourced from LiteLLM's pricing database, which covers 100+ models across OpenAI, Anthropic, and other providers. Implements a calculateCost function that handles variable pricing tiers, currency conversion, and subscription plan adjustments (e.g., Claude Pro discounts), ensuring accurate financial visibility without requiring API calls to pricing services.
Unique: Integrates LiteLLM's comprehensive pricing database as a built-in data source rather than requiring external API calls, enabling offline cost calculation and eliminating latency. Handles subscription plan adjustments (Claude Pro discounts) and multi-currency support natively.
vs alternatives: Provides accurate, offline cost calculation across 100+ models without API dependencies, whereas most token trackers either hardcode pricing or require cloud lookups that add latency and privacy exposure.
Renders a terminal-based interactive dashboard (TUI) using a framework like Ink or Blessed that displays aggregated token usage, costs, and efficiency metrics across multiple time periods (Today, 7 Days, 30 Days, All Time). Implements keyboard-driven navigation, filtering by project/model/task category, and drill-down capabilities that allow developers to explore cost patterns without leaving the terminal. Updates metrics in real-time as new session data is discovered.
Unique: Implements a keyboard-driven TUI dashboard that runs entirely in the terminal without external dependencies, enabling cost monitoring in headless environments and SSH sessions. Provides drill-down navigation from aggregate metrics to individual turns without context switching.
vs alternatives: Offers a native terminal experience for developers who live in the CLI, whereas web-based dashboards require browser context switching and are inaccessible in SSH/headless environments.
Aggregates parsed session turns into daily buckets and higher-level time periods (7 Days, 30 Days, All Time) using an aggregateProjectsIntoDays function that groups by date, project, and model. Implements a caching layer that stores aggregated results to avoid recomputing statistics on every dashboard load, with cache invalidation triggered by new session data discovery. Supports efficient querying of cost trends across arbitrary time windows.
Unique: Implements a two-level aggregation strategy (daily buckets + period summaries) with intelligent cache invalidation that rebuilds only affected time periods when new sessions are discovered, avoiding full recomputation. Uses immutable daily aggregates as the foundation for all higher-level queries.
vs alternatives: Provides fast metric queries even with large datasets by pre-aggregating and caching, whereas naive approaches that recalculate from raw turns on every query become slow with 1000+ turns.
Scans session history to identify inefficient token usage patterns such as redundant file reads, bloated context windows, unused MCP tool invocations, and low one-shot success rates. Implements an optimization engine (codeburn optimize) that analyzes turn sequences, detects repeated operations on the same files, and generates actionable recommendations to reduce token waste. Uses heuristic rules and statistical analysis to flag anomalies in token consumption.
Unique: Analyzes turn sequences and file access patterns to detect structural inefficiencies (e.g., reading the same file 5 times in a single session) rather than just flagging high token counts. Tracks one-shot success rate as a proxy for efficiency and correlates it with context size and tool usage.
vs alternatives: Provides actionable optimization recommendations based on actual usage patterns, whereas generic cost-cutting advice (e.g., 'use smaller models') ignores the specific inefficiencies in a developer's workflow.
+4 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs codeburn at 43/100. codeburn leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities