Supermaven ranks higher at 71/100 vs GitHub Copilot modernization at 42/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | GitHub Copilot modernization | Supermaven |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Extension | Extension |
| UnfragileRank | 42/100 | 71/100 |
| Adoption | 1 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Analyzes entire project structure including source code, configuration files, and dependency manifests to identify modernization opportunities, outdated libraries, framework versions, and security vulnerabilities. The agent performs static analysis across Java, Python, and .NET codebases to generate a prioritized remediation roadmap with dependency-aware recommendations for runtime and framework upgrades.
Unique: Integrates multi-language static analysis (Java, Python, .NET) with dependency graph traversal and Azure-specific migration patterns within VS Code, rather than requiring separate CLI tools or external SaaS platforms. Uses AI agent to contextualize findings within application architecture rather than simple rule-based flagging.
vs alternatives: Provides integrated assessment + planning + execution within VS Code, whereas tools like Snyk or OWASP Dependency-Check require external platforms and manual remediation planning.
Executes AI-driven code modifications to upgrade runtime versions and frameworks based on project dependencies and detected patterns. The agent analyzes code semantics (not just regex patterns) to rewrite deprecated APIs, update import statements, refactor configuration, and apply framework-specific migration patterns. Transformations are dependency-aware, ensuring changes respect transitive dependency constraints and avoid breaking changes.
Unique: Uses semantic code analysis (not text-based regex) to understand API deprecations and framework-specific patterns, enabling structurally-aware transformations that preserve code intent. Integrates build validation and unit test execution into the transformation pipeline to ensure correctness before committing changes.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than IDE refactoring tools (which handle single-file changes) because it coordinates multi-file transformations with dependency awareness. Faster than manual code review because AI agent applies patterns across entire codebase in minutes rather than days of developer effort.
Generates detailed documentation of all security-related changes made during modernization, including CVE fixes, deprecated API removals, and security configuration updates. Review documents include change rationale, affected code locations, validation results, and compliance implications. Documentation is formatted for audit trails and can be exported for compliance reporting (SOC2, PCI-DSS, etc.).
Unique: Automatically generates compliance documentation for security changes, rather than requiring manual documentation after the fact. Integrates security change tracking into the modernization workflow, creating audit trails as changes are applied.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than manual change logs because it captures all security-related changes automatically. More audit-ready than ad-hoc documentation because generated reports follow compliance-friendly formats.
Executes project builds and unit tests after code transformations to detect compilation errors, test failures, and runtime issues. When errors are detected, the AI agent analyzes error messages, identifies root causes in the transformed code, and automatically applies fixes (e.g., correcting import statements, fixing type mismatches, updating method signatures). Validation loops until build succeeds or manual intervention is required.
Unique: Closes the feedback loop between transformation and validation by automatically analyzing build errors and applying fixes, rather than requiring developers to manually debug and fix each error. Integrates native build system execution (Maven, Gradle, .NET) rather than relying on external CI/CD platforms.
vs alternatives: Faster than manual debugging because AI agent correlates error messages to code changes and applies fixes automatically. More reliable than relying on developers to catch errors because validation is deterministic and repeatable.
Scans project dependencies for known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) post-upgrade and identifies vulnerable libraries. In 'Agent Mode', the system automatically generates and applies security patches by upgrading vulnerable dependencies to patched versions, rewriting code to use secure APIs, and removing deprecated security-sensitive functions. Security changes are validated through build and test execution before being presented for review.
Unique: Combines vulnerability detection with automated remediation and code rewriting in a single workflow, rather than stopping at vulnerability reporting. Integrates security fixes into the transformation pipeline with build validation, ensuring patches don't introduce new issues.
vs alternatives: More proactive than Dependabot or Snyk because it automatically applies fixes and validates them, rather than just opening pull requests for manual review. Integrated into VS Code workflow, eliminating context-switching to external security platforms.
Analyzes application architecture, dependencies, and configuration to automatically generate Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) templates for Azure deployment. The agent infers required Azure services (App Service, SQL Database, Key Vault, etc.) based on application patterns, generates resource definitions with appropriate scaling and security settings, and creates deployment scripts. Output format (Terraform, ARM templates, or Bicep) is configurable based on team preferences.
Unique: Infers Azure infrastructure requirements from application code patterns rather than requiring manual specification, reducing infrastructure design effort. Integrates IaC generation into the modernization workflow, enabling end-to-end application upgrade + deployment in a single tool.
vs alternatives: More automated than manual Azure Portal configuration or CloudFormation templates because it analyzes application code to determine infrastructure needs. Faster than hiring cloud architects to design infrastructure manually.
Generates CI/CD pipeline configurations (GitHub Actions, Azure Pipelines, or other platforms) based on application type, build system, and deployment target. The agent creates workflow files that automate build, test, security scanning, and deployment stages. Pipelines are configured to trigger on code changes and include automated rollback mechanisms for failed deployments.
Unique: Generates platform-specific pipeline configurations (GitHub Actions, Azure Pipelines) based on application analysis rather than requiring manual YAML authoring. Integrates pipeline generation into the modernization workflow, enabling end-to-end automation from code upgrade to production deployment.
vs alternatives: Faster than manually writing pipeline YAML because agent infers stages and steps from application structure. More reliable than copy-paste pipeline templates because generated pipelines are customized to specific application requirements.
Provides conversational AI interface within Copilot Chat window for asking modernization questions, requesting specific transformations, and getting step-by-step guidance. Users can ask natural language queries like 'Upgrade my solution to .NET 6' or 'Migrate to Azure' and the agent interprets intent, breaks down tasks, and guides execution. Chat maintains context across conversation turns, allowing follow-up questions and iterative refinement of modernization plans.
Unique: Integrates conversational AI directly into VS Code workflow via Copilot Chat, allowing developers to ask questions without leaving their editor. Maintains conversation context to enable iterative refinement of modernization plans based on user feedback.
vs alternatives: More interactive than static documentation because users can ask follow-up questions and get personalized guidance. More accessible than hiring modernization consultants because AI guidance is available instantly and at no marginal cost.
+3 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs GitHub Copilot modernization at 42/100. GitHub Copilot modernization leads on adoption and ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities