| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Analyzes historical OHLCV (open, high, low, close, volume) data and technical indicators using ensemble machine learning models (likely LSTM, gradient boosting, or hybrid architectures) to generate forward-looking price predictions and trend direction probabilities. The system ingests aggregated market data, applies feature engineering for volatility, momentum, and mean-reversion signals, then outputs probabilistic forecasts with confidence intervals across multiple timeframes (daily, weekly, monthly).
Unique: Provides institutional-grade ML forecasting (typically reserved for hedge funds and quant firms) to retail investors at zero cost, likely using aggregated/delayed market data and simplified feature sets to reduce computational overhead while maintaining predictive signal
vs alternatives: Eliminates cost barriers vs. Bloomberg Terminal, FactSet, or proprietary trading platforms, but trades real-time data access and model transparency for accessibility
Scans historical price and volume data across stocks, indices, commodities, and cryptocurrencies to identify statistical anomalies, unusual correlations, and recurring chart patterns (head-and-shoulders, triangles, breakouts) using unsupervised learning or rule-based pattern matching. The system flags deviations from normal trading behavior (e.g., volume spikes, volatility compression, correlation breakdowns) that may signal emerging opportunities or risks, outputting ranked alerts by statistical significance.
Unique: Applies unsupervised anomaly detection and rule-based pattern matching across multiple asset classes simultaneously, reducing manual chart scanning burden; likely uses statistical distance metrics (z-score, isolation forests) or template matching rather than deep learning to maintain interpretability and speed
vs alternatives: Faster and cheaper than hiring a technical analyst to manually screen charts, but less nuanced than human pattern recognition and prone to false positives in choppy markets
Aggregates and analyzes alternative data sources (social media mentions, news sentiment, options flow, insider transactions, or fund flows) to generate market sentiment scores and contrarian signals. The system applies NLP or rule-based scoring to quantify bullish/bearish sentiment, identifies when sentiment diverges from price action (e.g., extreme pessimism at market bottoms), and surfaces contrarian opportunities where crowd positioning may be crowded or extreme.
Unique: Synthesizes multiple alternative data streams (social, news, options, flows) into unified sentiment scores rather than relying solely on price/volume; likely uses weighted NLP scoring or rule-based aggregation to surface contrarian extremes where crowd positioning diverges from fundamentals
vs alternatives: Cheaper and more accessible than institutional sentiment platforms (Sentdex, Koyfin, Refinitiv), but likely lower data quality and less frequent updates than premium alternatives
Analyzes a user's portfolio holdings to decompose risk across asset classes, sectors, and geographies, and identifies hidden correlations and concentration risks. The system ingests a portfolio snapshot (holdings, weights, or transaction history), calculates pairwise correlations between assets, performs factor analysis to identify common drivers of returns, and surfaces concentration risks (e.g., overweight to tech, currency exposure, or single-country risk) that may not be obvious from raw holdings.
Unique: Decomposes portfolio risk across multiple dimensions (asset class, sector, geography, factor) simultaneously, surfacing hidden correlations and concentration risks that simple diversification metrics miss; likely uses covariance matrix calculations and principal component analysis to identify dominant risk drivers
vs alternatives: More accessible and free vs. Morningstar Premium, Vanguard Portfolio Review, or robo-advisor risk dashboards, but lacks personalized rebalancing recommendations and real-time portfolio monitoring
Enables users to construct custom scenarios (e.g., interest rate hikes, earnings misses, sector rotation) and simulate their impact on portfolio returns, asset prices, or market indices. The system applies parametric or Monte Carlo simulation methods to model how changes in macro variables (rates, inflation, GDP growth) or micro variables (earnings, margins, valuations) propagate through asset prices, outputting probability distributions of outcomes and sensitivity rankings showing which variables matter most.
Unique: Abstracts away complex financial modeling by providing templated scenario builders and automated sensitivity analysis, likely using parametric or Monte Carlo simulation engines with pre-built relationships between macro variables and asset prices, reducing barrier to entry for non-quant investors
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than building models in Excel or Python, but less flexible and transparent than custom modeling frameworks; lacks ability to model complex feedback loops or regime-dependent relationships
Ingests and normalizes market data (prices, volumes, spreads, order book depth) from multiple exchanges and data providers, handling format differences, latency variations, and data quality issues to present a unified, clean view. The system applies data validation rules to detect stale quotes, crossed markets, or obvious errors, and provides standardized OHLCV data, bid-ask spreads, and volume metrics across stocks, indices, commodities, and crypto in a consistent format.
Unique: Abstracts away complexity of managing multiple exchange APIs and data formats by providing unified, normalized market data access; likely uses ETL pipelines to ingest, validate, and standardize data from multiple sources, with fallback logic to handle provider outages or latency spikes
vs alternatives: Simpler and cheaper than managing direct exchange connections or premium data providers (Bloomberg, Reuters), but trades real-time latency and data depth for accessibility and ease of use
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Global Predictions Inc at 38/100. Global Predictions Inc leads on adoption and quality, while Supabase is stronger on ecosystem.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities