Glide ranks higher at 70/100 vs @gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp at 41/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | @gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp | Glide |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | Product |
| UnfragileRank | 41/100 | 70/100 |
| Adoption | 1 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements automatic OAuth2 token acquisition and refresh for Gmail API access without manual credential management. The server handles the full OAuth2 flow including authorization code exchange, token storage, and automatic refresh token rotation, eliminating the need for developers to manually manage credentials or implement OAuth2 boilerplate. Integrates with Google's OAuth2 endpoints and maintains persistent token state across MCP server sessions.
Unique: Implements transparent OAuth2 token lifecycle management within the MCP server boundary, allowing Claude/Cursor to invoke Gmail operations without exposing authentication complexity to the AI model or requiring manual token refresh logic in agent code
vs alternatives: Eliminates OAuth2 boilerplate compared to raw Gmail API clients by automating token refresh and storage within the MCP server, reducing integration friction for AI agents
Exposes Gmail message listing and retrieval operations through MCP tools, supporting query-based filtering using Gmail's search syntax (labels, from/to, date ranges, full-text search). The server translates MCP tool calls into Gmail API list/get requests with support for pagination and selective field retrieval, enabling AI agents to search and fetch email messages without direct API knowledge.
Unique: Wraps Gmail API message operations as MCP tools with natural language query support, allowing Claude/Cursor to invoke email searches using conversational intent rather than requiring knowledge of Gmail's search syntax or API pagination patterns
vs alternatives: More accessible than raw Gmail API clients for AI agents because it abstracts pagination, query construction, and response parsing into simple tool invocations
Provides MCP tools for composing and sending emails through Gmail API, handling MIME message construction, recipient validation, and attachment encoding. The server abstracts Gmail's message format requirements (RFC 2822 MIME structure) and manages the send operation through the Gmail API, allowing AI agents to compose emails with proper formatting without manual MIME handling.
Unique: Abstracts MIME message construction and Gmail API send semantics into a single MCP tool, allowing AI agents to send emails with natural language parameters (recipients, subject, body) without understanding RFC 2822 or Gmail's message format requirements
vs alternatives: Simpler than using Gmail API directly because it handles MIME encoding and validation automatically, reducing the cognitive load on AI agents or developers integrating email sending
Exposes Gmail label operations (create, list, modify, delete) through MCP tools, enabling AI agents to organize messages by applying or removing labels. The server translates label operations into Gmail API calls, supporting label hierarchy and color customization, allowing agents to implement email organization workflows without direct API knowledge.
Unique: Provides label management as MCP tools, enabling AI agents to dynamically organize emails by creating and applying labels based on message content or metadata without requiring pre-configured label hierarchies
vs alternatives: More flexible than static Gmail filters because labels can be created and applied dynamically by AI agents based on real-time content analysis and decision logic
Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server interface, exposing Gmail capabilities as standardized tool definitions with JSON schema validation. The server defines tool schemas for each Gmail operation (list messages, send email, apply labels) and handles tool invocation requests from MCP clients (Claude, Cursor), managing parameter validation and response formatting according to MCP specification.
Unique: Implements full MCP server lifecycle including tool discovery, schema validation, and invocation handling, allowing Claude/Cursor to treat Gmail operations as first-class tools with automatic parameter validation and error handling
vs alternatives: More robust than custom API wrappers because MCP provides standardized tool discovery and schema validation, reducing the need for agents to understand implementation details
Manages OAuth2 token persistence across server restarts and automatic refresh token rotation. The server stores tokens in a persistent backend (file system or database — mechanism not specified) and implements automatic refresh logic triggered before token expiration, ensuring continuous Gmail API access without manual re-authentication.
Unique: Implements transparent token refresh within the MCP server, eliminating the need for agents or developers to monitor token expiration or manually trigger refresh operations
vs alternatives: More reliable than manual token management because it proactively refreshes tokens before expiration, preventing API failures in long-running agent workflows
Provides MCP tools for creating, updating, and deleting Gmail drafts without sending. The server manages draft state in Gmail's draft folder, allowing AI agents to compose emails incrementally, save work-in-progress messages, and retrieve drafts for review or modification before sending.
Unique: Separates draft composition from sending, allowing AI agents to create email content without immediately dispatching, enabling human review or multi-step composition workflows
vs alternatives: More flexible than direct send operations because drafts allow agents to propose emails for human approval before committing to send
Exposes Gmail thread operations through MCP tools, allowing AI agents to retrieve full email conversations (threads) with all related messages. The server handles thread ID resolution and message ordering, enabling agents to analyze email conversations in context without fetching individual messages separately.
Unique: Retrieves email threads as cohesive conversation units rather than individual messages, enabling AI agents to analyze email context and relationships without manual message aggregation
vs alternatives: More contextually aware than message-by-message retrieval because threads preserve conversation structure and enable agents to understand email relationships
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 70/100 vs @gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp at 41/100. @gongrzhe/server-gmail-autoauth-mcp leads on ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities