| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes Google Drive's native search API through the Model Context Protocol's tool interface, allowing LLM clients to query files by name, metadata, and MIME type without direct API credentials. Implements MCP's tool registration pattern to translate natural language search intents into Google Drive query syntax, handling pagination and result filtering server-side before returning structured file metadata to the client.
Unique: Implements MCP's tool registration pattern to abstract Google Drive's query syntax, allowing LLM clients to search without understanding Drive's native query language or managing credentials directly. Uses server-side pagination to prevent overwhelming clients with large result sets.
vs alternatives: Simpler than direct Google Drive API integration for LLM agents because MCP handles authentication, pagination, and query translation transparently; more discoverable than raw API calls because tools are self-documenting via MCP's schema interface.
Retrieves the full text content of Google Docs documents through the Google Drive API, converting Google's proprietary document format into plain text or structured markdown while preserving document hierarchy (headings, lists, tables). Implements streaming content retrieval to handle large documents efficiently, with server-side caching to reduce redundant API calls for frequently accessed documents.
Unique: Converts Google Docs' proprietary document format into consumable text via the Google Drive API's export functionality, with optional markdown formatting for better LLM consumption. Implements server-side caching to reduce API quota usage for repeated document access.
vs alternatives: More efficient than downloading .docx files and parsing locally because conversion happens server-side; more reliable than screen-scraping because it uses official Google APIs; better for RAG than full-text search because it preserves document structure.
Retrieves data from Google Sheets as structured JSON or CSV, automatically inferring column types and handling sparse data. Uses the Google Sheets API to fetch cell ranges with formatting metadata, then transforms the raw grid into columnar format with optional type coercion (dates, numbers, booleans). Supports filtering and sorting server-side to reduce payload size for large sheets.
Unique: Implements automatic schema inference by analyzing cell values and types across columns, converting Google Sheets' flat grid format into structured JSON with type coercion. Uses the Sheets API's range queries to fetch only requested data, reducing bandwidth vs full-sheet export.
vs alternatives: More flexible than CSV export because it preserves type information and supports range queries; more efficient than downloading .xlsx files because conversion happens server-side; better for LLM consumption than raw grid format because it's already columnar.
Extracts text content, speaker notes, and slide structure from Google Slides presentations via the Google Slides API, converting slide hierarchy into a traversable outline format. Handles both text-based content and metadata (slide titles, notes, layout information) while optionally exporting slide images as base64-encoded data for multimodal LLM processing. Implements lazy loading to avoid fetching all slides upfront.
Unique: Extracts both text content and speaker notes from Slides, organizing them into a hierarchical structure that preserves slide order and relationships. Optionally includes slide images as base64 for multimodal LLM processing, enabling visual analysis alongside text.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than PDF export because it preserves speaker notes and slide structure; more efficient than downloading .pptx files because conversion happens server-side; enables multimodal analysis that PDF-based approaches cannot support.
Lists contents of a Google Drive folder with optional recursive traversal to build a complete folder tree structure. Uses the Google Drive API's file list endpoint with parent folder filtering, implementing depth-first or breadth-first traversal patterns to map folder hierarchies. Returns structured metadata for each file/folder (id, name, mimeType, size, permissions) enabling clients to understand Drive organization without manual navigation.
Unique: Implements recursive folder traversal through the MCP tool interface, abstracting the complexity of multiple API calls and pagination. Returns both hierarchical and flat representations to support different client use cases (tree visualization vs flat indexing).
vs alternatives: More efficient than manual folder navigation because traversal happens server-side; more discoverable than raw API calls because folder structure is pre-computed; supports both tree and flat representations unlike single-format APIs.
Exposes Google Drive files as MCP resources, allowing LLM clients to reference files by URI (e.g., 'gdrive://file-id') and retrieve their metadata or content on-demand. Implements MCP's resource protocol to provide file handles that clients can pass between tools, enabling workflows where one tool's output (a file ID) becomes another tool's input without explicit serialization. Supports resource templates for common patterns (e.g., 'gdrive://folder/{folder-id}/files').
Unique: Implements MCP's resource protocol to treat Google Drive files as first-class entities that can be referenced and passed between tools, rather than requiring explicit content embedding. Uses resource templates to support common Drive patterns without hardcoding specific file IDs.
vs alternatives: More efficient than embedding file content in prompts because resources are lazy-loaded; more composable than direct API calls because resources can be chained across tools; more discoverable than raw URIs because resource templates are self-documenting.
Manages Google OAuth 2.0 authentication for the MCP server, handling credential storage, token refresh, and expiration. Implements automatic token refresh before expiration to prevent mid-request failures, with fallback to credential re-authentication if refresh fails. Supports both service account credentials (for server-to-server access) and user credentials (for user-delegated access), with secure credential storage using environment variables or encrypted local storage.
Unique: Implements automatic OAuth token refresh with fallback re-authentication, ensuring the MCP server remains authenticated across long-running sessions without manual intervention. Supports both service account and user credential flows transparently.
vs alternatives: More reliable than manual token management because refresh is automatic; more flexible than single-credential-type systems because it supports both service accounts and user credentials; more secure than hardcoded tokens because it uses OAuth's refresh mechanism.
Implements resilient error handling for Google Drive API calls with exponential backoff retry logic for transient failures (rate limits, timeouts, temporary service errors). Distinguishes between retryable errors (429, 500, 503) and permanent failures (401, 403, 404) to avoid wasting retries on unrecoverable errors. Tracks API quota usage and implements client-side rate limiting to prevent hitting Google's quotas, with configurable backoff strategies.
Unique: Implements intelligent retry logic that distinguishes between retryable and permanent errors, avoiding wasted retries on unrecoverable failures. Combines exponential backoff with client-side rate limiting to balance resilience and quota management.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than naive retry-all approaches because it classifies errors intelligently; more quota-aware than simple retry logic because it implements client-side rate limiting; more transparent than silent failures because it provides detailed error information.
+2 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Google Drive MCP Server scores higher at 61/100 vs Supabase at 42/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities