MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs Google: Gemma 3 4B at 22/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Google: Gemma 3 4B | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 22/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $4.00e-8 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes both image and text inputs simultaneously through a unified transformer architecture, maintaining coherence across up to 128,000 tokens of context. The model uses interleaved vision-language embeddings that allow it to reason about visual content and text in the same forward pass, enabling tasks like image captioning, visual question answering, and document analysis without separate encoding pipelines.
Unique: Unified transformer processing of vision and language in a single forward pass rather than separate encoders, enabling true cross-modal reasoning within a 128k token budget shared across both modalities
vs alternatives: Larger context window (128k) than GPT-4V (128k shared) and Claude 3.5 Vision (200k) but with better efficiency for mixed vision-text tasks due to native multimodal architecture rather than bolted-on vision modules
The model's transformer backbone is trained on a diverse multilingual corpus covering 140+ languages, using shared token embeddings and language-agnostic attention patterns. This enables zero-shot cross-lingual transfer where the model can understand and respond in languages not explicitly fine-tuned, with particular strength in high-resource languages and emerging support for low-resource language pairs through transfer learning.
Unique: Shared multilingual embedding space trained on 140+ languages enables zero-shot cross-lingual understanding without language-specific fine-tuning, using transfer learning from high-resource to low-resource languages
vs alternatives: Broader language coverage (140+) than GPT-4 (100+) with better low-resource language support through explicit multilingual training rather than incidental coverage from web data
Enhanced transformer layers with specialized attention patterns for mathematical token sequences, trained on mathematical datasets including proofs, equations, and step-by-step solutions. The model learns to decompose complex math problems into intermediate symbolic steps, maintaining consistency across multi-step derivations through constrained decoding that validates mathematical syntax during generation.
Unique: Specialized attention patterns for mathematical token sequences combined with constrained decoding that validates mathematical syntax during generation, rather than post-hoc validation of outputs
vs alternatives: Better mathematical reasoning than base Gemma 2 through dedicated training on mathematical datasets, though still weaker than specialized math models like Grok or Claude 3.5 Sonnet for competition-level mathematics
The 4B model is instruction-tuned using reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) to follow complex multi-step instructions while maintaining awareness of conversation history and user intent. The chat interface uses a sliding context window that prioritizes recent messages and system prompts, with attention masking that prevents the model from attending to irrelevant historical context beyond a certain age threshold.
Unique: RLHF-tuned instruction following with sliding context window that uses attention masking to deprioritize stale context, enabling efficient long-conversation handling without full context replay
vs alternatives: More efficient instruction following than Gemma 2 due to dedicated RLHF training, though less nuanced than Claude 3.5 Sonnet for complex multi-step reasoning tasks
A lightweight transformer model with 4 billion parameters optimized for inference speed and memory efficiency through quantization-aware training and architectural pruning. The model uses grouped query attention (GQA) to reduce KV cache size, enabling deployment on consumer GPUs and edge devices while maintaining competitive performance with larger models through knowledge distillation from larger Gemma variants.
Unique: Grouped query attention combined with quantization-aware training enables sub-8GB inference while maintaining knowledge distilled from larger Gemma models, rather than training from scratch at small scale
vs alternatives: Faster inference than Llama 2 7B on consumer hardware due to GQA and quantization optimization, though less capable than Llama 3.2 1B for ultra-lightweight deployments
The model can be constrained to generate outputs matching a provided JSON schema through constrained decoding, where a token-level validator prevents generation of tokens that would violate the schema. This enables reliable extraction of structured data (JSON, XML) without post-processing, using a grammar-based approach that enforces valid syntax during generation rather than validating after the fact.
Unique: Token-level constrained decoding using grammar-based validation prevents invalid outputs during generation, rather than post-processing and re-prompting on validation failure
vs alternatives: More reliable structured output than Claude 3.5 Sonnet's JSON mode for complex schemas due to hard constraints during generation, though slightly slower due to validation overhead
Gemma 3 4B is accessible via OpenRouter's unified API endpoint, which abstracts away model-specific implementation details and provides a standardized interface for text and vision inputs. The integration handles authentication, rate limiting, and request routing through OpenRouter's infrastructure, enabling seamless switching between Gemma 3 and other models without code changes.
Unique: Unified OpenRouter API abstraction enables model-agnostic code that can switch between Gemma 3, Claude, GPT-4, and other models with a single parameter change, rather than model-specific SDK integration
vs alternatives: More flexible than direct Google API access for multi-model evaluation, though slightly higher latency and cost than direct endpoints
The model supports server-sent events (SSE) streaming where tokens are emitted as they are generated, enabling real-time display of model output without waiting for full completion. The streaming implementation uses chunked HTTP transfer encoding with newline-delimited JSON events, allowing clients to display partial responses and cancel requests mid-generation.
Unique: Server-sent events streaming with newline-delimited JSON enables true token-by-token streaming without buffering, allowing clients to display partial responses and cancel mid-generation
vs alternatives: Standard SSE streaming is simpler to implement than WebSocket-based streaming used by some competitors, though slightly higher latency per token due to HTTP overhead
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs Google: Gemma 3 4B at 22/100. MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities