| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates email drafts by analyzing the current message thread, recipient identity, and conversation history to produce contextually appropriate responses. The system integrates with Gmail's message parsing API to extract thread context, applies LLM-based tone matching based on detected sender communication style, and inserts generated content directly into Gmail's compose window via DOM manipulation or Gmail API integration.
Unique: Integrates directly into Gmail's compose interface with thread-aware context injection, allowing users to generate drafts without leaving the email client, versus standalone AI writing tools that require copy-paste workflows
vs alternatives: Faster than generic LLM chat interfaces because it automatically extracts and injects email thread context, eliminating manual prompt engineering for each reply
Analyzes incoming emails or entire threads to extract key information, action items, and decisions, then presents a condensed summary in a sidebar or popup. Uses extractive and abstractive summarization techniques to identify entities (names, dates, amounts), sentiment, and urgency signals, then formats output as bullet points or structured data for quick scanning.
Unique: Operates within Gmail's native UI as a sidebar widget, providing real-time summaries without context-switching, whereas standalone summarization tools require copying email text to external interfaces
vs alternatives: More efficient than manual reading because it combines extractive summarization (preserving original phrasing) with abstractive techniques (generating concise overviews) to balance accuracy and brevity
Automatically categorizes incoming emails into user-defined or predefined labels (e.g., urgent, follow-up, FYI, action-required) using multi-label text classification. The system learns from user labeling patterns via feedback loops, applies rule-based heuristics (e.g., flagging emails with 'ASAP' or from VIP contacts), and integrates with Gmail's label API to apply tags without user intervention.
Unique: Learns from user's existing labeling behavior via implicit feedback, adapting classification rules over time without requiring explicit model retraining, whereas static rule-based email filters require manual rule updates
vs alternatives: More adaptive than Gmail's native filters because it uses machine learning to detect patterns in user behavior rather than requiring users to write conditional rules
Generates 2-3 contextually relevant short reply options (e.g., 'Thanks, I'll review and get back to you') based on email content and detected intent, displaying them as clickable buttons in the Gmail UI. Uses intent classification (question, request, announcement, etc.) to generate appropriate response templates, then inserts selected reply directly into the compose field with minimal user editing required.
Unique: Generates contextual suggestions directly in Gmail's reply UI with one-click insertion, similar to Gmail's native Smart Reply but with LLM-powered flexibility to handle diverse email types beyond Google's trained patterns
vs alternatives: More flexible than Gmail's native Smart Reply because it can adapt to user-specific communication styles and handle a broader range of email intents beyond Google's pre-trained model
Analyzes draft emails before sending to detect tone (formal, casual, aggressive, apologetic), sentiment (positive, negative, neutral), and potential communication issues (e.g., unclear requests, unintended rudeness). Provides real-time feedback and suggestions to adjust language, reframe requests, or soften harsh language, helping users communicate more effectively.
Unique: Provides real-time tone feedback within Gmail's compose interface with specific phrase-level suggestions, whereas standalone writing tools require separate analysis passes and lack email-specific context
vs alternatives: More actionable than generic grammar checkers because it focuses on communication intent and interpersonal impact rather than just syntax and style
Enables searching Gmail inbox using natural language queries (e.g., 'emails about the Q4 budget from finance team') instead of Gmail's native search syntax. Converts natural language to Gmail search operators, applies semantic similarity matching for fuzzy retrieval, and returns ranked results based on relevance to the query intent.
Unique: Converts natural language queries to Gmail search operators and applies semantic matching, making search accessible to non-technical users without requiring knowledge of Gmail's query syntax
vs alternatives: More intuitive than Gmail's native search because it accepts conversational queries and returns semantically relevant results rather than requiring users to construct precise keyword combinations
Suggests optimal send times for emails based on recipient timezone, historical open rates, and communication patterns. Also generates automatic follow-up reminders if emails go unanswered, with AI-suggested follow-up templates and timing intervals. Integrates with Gmail's scheduled send feature and task management systems to track pending responses.
Unique: Combines send-time optimization with automatic follow-up generation, using historical patterns to suggest both when to send and when to follow up, whereas Gmail's native scheduled send requires manual timing decisions
vs alternatives: More intelligent than static scheduling because it learns recipient-specific patterns and suggests follow-up timing based on response history rather than requiring users to manually set reminders
Creates reusable email templates from scratch or by analyzing existing sent emails, then personalizes them with dynamic variables (recipient name, company, previous interactions) at send time. Uses pattern recognition to identify boilerplate sections in user's sent folder, extracts them as template components, and provides a template library with search and categorization.
Unique: Automatically extracts templates from user's sent folder using pattern recognition, then personalizes them with dynamic variables, versus static template libraries that require manual creation and maintenance
vs alternatives: More efficient than manual template creation because it learns from existing communication patterns and automates variable injection, reducing time spent on repetitive email composition
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs GPT for Gmail at 19/100. Supabase also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities