| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 15 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Abstracts multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, OpenRouter, local Ollama/llama.cpp) behind a unified provider architecture that normalizes message formats, handles token counting, and manages model-specific capabilities. Uses a provider registry pattern with pluggable backends that transform provider-specific APIs into a common interface, enabling seamless model switching without changing agent logic.
Unique: Implements a provider registry pattern with normalized message transformation that handles both cloud (OpenAI, Anthropic) and local (Ollama, llama.cpp) models through the same interface, including token counting and model capability detection per provider
vs alternatives: More flexible than LangChain's provider abstraction because it's agent-first rather than chain-first, and supports local models natively without requiring additional infrastructure
Implements a tool system where LLMs invoke capabilities through a schema-based registry that maps tool names to executable functions. Each tool is a Python class inheriting from a base Tool interface with defined input schemas, execution logic, and output formatting. The agent parses LLM responses for tool invocations, validates against schemas, executes the tool, and feeds results back into the conversation loop.
Unique: Uses a Python class-based tool architecture where each tool is a self-contained module with input/output schemas, execution logic, and error handling, enabling both built-in tools (shell, file ops, browser) and user-defined extensions through inheritance
vs alternatives: More extensible than OpenAI's function calling alone because tools are first-class Python objects with full lifecycle management, not just JSON schemas; supports tools that don't map cleanly to function signatures
Provides three separate entry points for agent interaction: a CLI interface (gptme) for terminal use, a REST API server (gptme-server) for programmatic access, and an ncurses UI (gptme-nc) for interactive terminal UI. All interfaces share the same underlying agent logic and tool system, enabling deployment flexibility. The REST API exposes endpoints for chat, tool execution, and conversation management.
Unique: Provides three separate interfaces (CLI, REST API, ncurses) that all share the same underlying agent logic and tool system, enabling flexible deployment from terminal to service to interactive UI
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-interface tools because it supports multiple deployment modes, but adds complexity compared to CLI-only tools; REST API enables integration but requires managing network communication
Manages conversation state through a message history system that stores all agent-user interactions with metadata (role, timestamp, tool calls). Conversations are persisted to disk (JSON or database) and can be resumed, enabling long-running agents that maintain context across sessions. The system handles message serialization, context window management, and conversation loading/saving.
Unique: Implements a message history system that persists conversations to disk with metadata, enabling agents to resume with full context while managing context window constraints through selective message inclusion
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than simple logging because it preserves full conversation state for resumption, but adds I/O overhead compared to in-memory conversation management
Generates system prompts dynamically based on agent configuration, available tools, and context. The prompt generation system constructs detailed instructions that describe the agent's role, available tools with their schemas, and execution constraints. Prompts are customizable through configuration files and can be optimized using DSPy for improved agent performance.
Unique: Dynamically generates system prompts from tool definitions and configuration, with optional DSPy-based optimization to improve agent performance on specific tasks
vs alternatives: More flexible than static prompts because it adapts to available tools and configuration, but less precise than carefully hand-crafted prompts; DSPy optimization adds capability but requires training data
Provides an evaluation framework (gptme-eval) that measures agent performance on benchmark tasks using metrics like success rate, token efficiency, and execution time. The framework supports custom evaluation datasets, metric definitions, and comparison across different models and configurations. Results are aggregated and reported with statistical analysis.
Unique: Provides a framework for evaluating agent performance across multiple metrics and configurations, with support for custom benchmarks and statistical analysis of results
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than simple success/failure tracking because it measures efficiency metrics and enables statistical comparison, but requires significant effort to set up benchmarks
Implements a multi-level configuration system where settings can be defined in configuration files (YAML/JSON), environment variables, and command-line arguments, with a clear precedence hierarchy. Configuration is loaded at startup and merged across levels, enabling flexible deployment from development to production without code changes.
Unique: Implements a multi-level configuration hierarchy with file, environment variable, and CLI argument support, enabling flexible configuration management across deployment environments
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-source configuration because it supports multiple levels with clear precedence, but adds complexity compared to simple configuration files
Provides a shell tool that executes bash commands in a persistent environment, maintaining working directory state and command history across multiple invocations. Implements safety checks including command whitelisting/blacklisting, output truncation for large results, and error capture with exit codes. Uses subprocess with shell=True but applies filtering rules before execution.
Unique: Maintains persistent shell state across multiple agent invocations while applying safety filters before execution, using a subprocess-based approach with output truncation and error capture that preserves working directory context
vs alternatives: Safer than raw subprocess calls because it applies command filtering, but more flexible than restricted execution environments because it allows full bash syntax and maintains state across calls
+7 more capabilities
Crawls 11+ heterogeneous platforms (Zhihu, Weibo, Bilibili, Twitter, Reddit, HackerNews, etc.) and RSS feeds using platform-specific scrapers, normalizes disparate data schemas into a unified NewsItem model, and deduplicates content across sources using fuzzy title matching and URL canonicalization. The system maintains platform-specific metadata (rank, heat value, engagement metrics) while presenting a single normalized feed, enabling cross-platform trend detection that would be invisible within individual platform silos.
Unique: Implements platform-specific crawler modules with unified NewsItem schema and fuzzy deduplication across 11+ heterogeneous sources (Chinese + international), rather than relying on single-platform APIs or generic RSS parsing. Maintains platform-specific metadata (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) for weighted hotspot scoring.
vs alternatives: Covers more platforms (especially Chinese social media) with deeper metadata extraction than generic RSS aggregators, and provides unified deduplication across sources unlike single-platform monitoring tools.
Implements a multi-stage filtering pipeline that matches news items against user-defined keywords using regex patterns, required word lists, and excluded word lists. The system applies frequency-based scoring (keyword occurrence count) combined with platform hotspot weights to rank filtered results. Configuration is stored in frequency_words.txt with support for regex patterns, AND/OR/NOT boolean operators, and per-keyword weighting. Filtering occurs at collection time (reducing storage) and again at report generation time (enabling dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling).
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching with frequency-based scoring and platform hotspot weighting (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) in a two-stage pipeline (collection-time and report-time filtering). Supports dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling by applying filters at report generation.
TrendRadar scores higher at 58/100 vs gptme at 45/100. gptme leads on quality, while TrendRadar is stronger on adoption.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple keyword matching (supports regex and boolean logic) and more efficient than semantic filtering (no LLM overhead), making it suitable for real-time filtering at scale.
Detects newly emerged topics by comparing current crawl results against historical data stored in the system. Topics are marked as 🆕 (new) if they appear for the first time in the current crawl or if their hotspot rank increased significantly compared to previous crawls. The system tracks topic emergence velocity (how quickly a topic rises in rankings) and flags topics with unusual acceleration. New topic detection is performed at report generation time, enabling dynamic detection without re-crawling. The system maintains a historical hotspot index for comparison.
Unique: Detects new topics by comparing current hotspot rankings against historical data, marking topics with significant rank increases as 🆕. Tracks emergence velocity to distinguish breaking news from sustained trends.
vs alternatives: More efficient than semantic similarity detection (no LLM overhead) and more accurate than simple first-appearance detection (accounts for re-emerging topics), but requires historical baseline data.
Provides a web-based UI for editing TrendRadar configuration files (config.yaml, frequency_words.txt, timeline.yaml) with real-time validation and preview. The editor supports: (1) syntax highlighting for YAML and regex, (2) validation of keyword patterns (regex compilation check), (3) preview of filtered results based on current keyword configuration, (4) drag-and-drop channel configuration, (5) schedule preview (shows next 10 execution times). Changes are validated before saving, preventing configuration errors. The editor is optional; users can edit config files directly.
Unique: Provides web-based configuration editor with real-time validation, regex preview, and schedule visualization. Enables non-technical users to configure TrendRadar without editing YAML files.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual YAML editing and provides validation feedback, but adds operational complexity compared to file-based configuration.
Integrates LiteLLM to provide vendor-agnostic AI analysis and summarization of filtered news items. Users configure their preferred LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models, etc.) once in config.yaml, and the system automatically routes analysis requests to that provider. The AI analysis capability includes: (1) automated summarization of long articles into key points, (2) sentiment analysis (positive/negative/neutral), (3) trend prediction based on historical patterns, and (4) custom analysis prompts. Analysis results are cached to avoid redundant API calls and can be pushed directly to notification channels.
Unique: Uses LiteLLM abstraction layer to support any LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models) with single configuration, enabling provider switching without code changes. Caches analysis results to reduce redundant API calls and costs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded OpenAI integration (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than dedicated sentiment analysis APIs (can use local models), but slower than rule-based sentiment analysis.
Leverages LiteLLM to translate news content from source languages (primarily Chinese) to target languages (English, etc.) on-demand. The system detects source language automatically (via langdetect or similar), caches translations to avoid re-translating identical content, and batches translation requests to reduce API calls. Translations are stored alongside original content, enabling bilingual reports and multi-language notification delivery. Translation can be triggered at collection time (all news) or report time (only filtered news).
Unique: Implements provider-agnostic translation via LiteLLM with automatic language detection, content-based caching, and batch request optimization. Stores translations alongside originals for bilingual report generation.
vs alternatives: More flexible than dedicated translation APIs (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than commercial translation services when using local models, but slower than specialized translation APIs.
Implements a notification abstraction layer supporting 9+ delivery channels (WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc.). Each channel has a provider-specific formatter that converts normalized news items into channel-appropriate messages (e.g., WeChat card format, Telegram markdown, email HTML). The system batches notifications atomically—all news items for a report are sent as a single batch to each channel, ensuring consistency and reducing API calls. Message formatting respects channel constraints (character limits, attachment limits, etc.) and supports templating for customization.
Unique: Implements atomic message batching across 9+ heterogeneous channels with provider-specific formatters and constraint-aware truncation. Single configuration enables simultaneous delivery to WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc. without code changes.
vs alternatives: Supports more channels (especially Chinese platforms like WeWork, Feishu) than generic notification services, and batching reduces API calls and spam compared to per-item notifications.
Exposes TrendRadar's data and analysis capabilities as an MCP server, enabling AI agents and LLM applications to query trends, perform analysis, and generate insights through natural language. The MCP server implements tools for: (1) querying filtered news by keyword/date/platform, (2) retrieving trend statistics and hotspot rankings, (3) running custom analysis on news subsets, (4) generating reports in various formats. Clients (Claude, other LLM agents) can invoke these tools via MCP protocol, enabling conversational exploration of trends without direct database access. The server maintains state across multiple requests, allowing multi-turn conversations about trends.
Unique: Implements full MCP server exposing trend data and analysis tools to LLM agents, enabling conversational queries and multi-turn analysis workflows. Maintains state across requests and supports complex tool invocations (filtering, analysis, report generation).
vs alternatives: Enables conversational access to trends (vs. API-only access) and integrates with LLM agent workflows (vs. standalone tools), but adds operational complexity compared to simple REST APIs.
+4 more capabilities