| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Repairs syntactically broken JSON by using ANTLR parser to identify structural errors (missing braces, brackets, parentheses) and applies configurable repair strategies (SimpleRepairStrategy, CorrectRepairStrategy) to fix them. The JSONRepair orchestrator class manages the repair pipeline, attempting fixes iteratively up to a configurable limit, with error context tracking via the Expecting class to understand what tokens are missing at failure points.
Unique: Uses ANTLR-based syntax-aware parsing with strategy pattern for multi-pass repair attempts, rather than regex-based string manipulation; tracks error context via Expecting class to understand what tokens are missing at specific parse failure points, enabling targeted repairs instead of blind string patching
vs alternatives: More structurally aware than regex-based JSON repair tools because it parses the full token stream and understands nesting depth, allowing it to correctly repair complex nested structures where simpler tools would fail or produce invalid output
Extracts valid JSON objects or arrays from larger text blocks (e.g., LLM responses with explanatory text before/after JSON) using SimpleExtractStrategy, which scans for JSON delimiters and isolates contiguous JSON content. Extracted JSON is then passed through the repair pipeline if it contains anomalies, enabling end-to-end recovery of structured data from unstructured LLM outputs.
Unique: Combines extraction (SimpleExtractStrategy) with repair in a single pipeline, so extracted JSON that is malformed is automatically repaired; most tools extract OR repair, not both in sequence
vs alternatives: Handles the full end-to-end workflow of extracting JSON from noisy LLM text and fixing it in one call, whereas regex-based extractors require separate repair steps and often fail on partially-formed JSON
Includes comprehensive integration tests (IntegrationTests class) covering a wide range of JSON anomalies produced by LLMs: missing braces/brackets, unquoted keys/values, trailing commas, missing outer delimiters, and nested structure errors. Tests are organized by anomaly type and include both positive cases (repair succeeds) and negative cases (repair fails gracefully), providing confidence in repair behavior across different LLM output patterns.
Unique: Organizes tests by JSON anomaly type with explicit test cases for each repair strategy, providing clear visibility into what anomalies are handled and which are not; most JSON repair tools lack comprehensive test documentation
vs alternatives: Provides explicit test coverage for different LLM output anomalies, enabling developers to understand repair behavior and limitations before integrating into production systems
Implements a configurable repair pipeline via JSONRepairConfig that allows developers to set maximum repair attempt counts and extraction modes. The JSONRepair orchestrator applies repair strategies iteratively, re-parsing after each fix attempt until either the JSON is valid or the attempt limit is reached. This prevents infinite loops while allowing heuristic-based repairs to converge on valid output through multiple passes.
Unique: Exposes repair attempt limits and extraction mode as first-class configuration parameters via JSONRepairConfig, allowing developers to tune repair behavior without modifying code; most JSON repair tools have fixed repair logic with no tuning surface
vs alternatives: Provides explicit control over repair aggressiveness and resource consumption, whereas most JSON repair libraries apply a fixed set of heuristics with no way to adjust behavior for different LLM output characteristics
Tracks parse error context through the Expecting class, which records what tokens the parser expected at the point of failure (e.g., 'expected }' or 'expected ]'). This error context is used by repair strategies to make targeted fixes rather than blind string manipulation. When ANTLR parsing fails, the Expecting object captures the expected token type and position, enabling the repair strategy to insert the correct missing delimiter at the right location.
Unique: Uses ANTLR error listener integration to capture expected token context at parse failure points, enabling context-aware repairs; most JSON repair tools use simple regex or string-based heuristics without understanding what the parser expected
vs alternatives: Provides semantic understanding of parse failures through token expectations, allowing repairs to be targeted and correct, whereas blind string manipulation approaches often produce invalid JSON or incorrect repairs
Repairs JSON where keys or values lack quotation marks (e.g., {f:v} instead of {"f":"v"}) by detecting unquoted identifiers and automatically inserting quotes around them. This is handled as part of the SimpleRepairStrategy, which identifies tokens that should be strings but lack delimiters and wraps them in quotes during the repair pass.
Unique: Integrates quote insertion into the ANTLR-based repair pipeline, so unquoted keys/values are identified during parsing and fixed in context, rather than using post-hoc regex replacement which can miss edge cases
vs alternatives: More accurate than regex-based quote insertion because it understands JSON structure and nesting, avoiding false positives in edge cases like unquoted values in nested objects
Removes redundant or trailing commas in JSON arrays and objects (e.g., [1,2,] becomes [1,2]) as part of the SimpleRepairStrategy. The repair logic detects comma tokens that appear before closing brackets or braces and removes them, producing valid JSON that conforms to the JSON specification which disallows trailing commas.
Unique: Integrates comma removal into the ANTLR-based repair pipeline with token-level awareness, so commas are removed only when they appear before closing delimiters, avoiding false positives in string values or nested structures
vs alternatives: More precise than regex-based comma removal because it understands JSON token boundaries and nesting, avoiding accidental removal of commas in string values or nested arrays
Automatically adds missing outermost braces or brackets to convert partial JSON fragments into valid JSON objects or arrays. For example, converts [1,2,3 to [1,2,3] or {"key":"value" to {"key":"value"}. This is implemented in SimpleRepairStrategy by detecting unclosed top-level delimiters and inserting the corresponding closing delimiter at the end of the input.
Unique: Detects unclosed top-level delimiters via ANTLR parsing and adds the corresponding closing delimiter, rather than using heuristic string matching; this ensures the added delimiter is correct for the structure type
vs alternatives: More reliable than simple string-based approaches (e.g., appending '}' if input starts with '{') because it understands nesting depth and can correctly close nested structures
+3 more capabilities
Crawls 11+ heterogeneous platforms (Zhihu, Weibo, Bilibili, Twitter, Reddit, HackerNews, etc.) and RSS feeds using platform-specific scrapers, normalizes disparate data schemas into a unified NewsItem model, and deduplicates content across sources using fuzzy title matching and URL canonicalization. The system maintains platform-specific metadata (rank, heat value, engagement metrics) while presenting a single normalized feed, enabling cross-platform trend detection that would be invisible within individual platform silos.
Unique: Implements platform-specific crawler modules with unified NewsItem schema and fuzzy deduplication across 11+ heterogeneous sources (Chinese + international), rather than relying on single-platform APIs or generic RSS parsing. Maintains platform-specific metadata (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) for weighted hotspot scoring.
vs alternatives: Covers more platforms (especially Chinese social media) with deeper metadata extraction than generic RSS aggregators, and provides unified deduplication across sources unlike single-platform monitoring tools.
Implements a multi-stage filtering pipeline that matches news items against user-defined keywords using regex patterns, required word lists, and excluded word lists. The system applies frequency-based scoring (keyword occurrence count) combined with platform hotspot weights to rank filtered results. Configuration is stored in frequency_words.txt with support for regex patterns, AND/OR/NOT boolean operators, and per-keyword weighting. Filtering occurs at collection time (reducing storage) and again at report generation time (enabling dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling).
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching with frequency-based scoring and platform hotspot weighting (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) in a two-stage pipeline (collection-time and report-time filtering). Supports dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling by applying filters at report generation.
TrendRadar scores higher at 58/100 vs json-repair at 25/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple keyword matching (supports regex and boolean logic) and more efficient than semantic filtering (no LLM overhead), making it suitable for real-time filtering at scale.
Detects newly emerged topics by comparing current crawl results against historical data stored in the system. Topics are marked as 🆕 (new) if they appear for the first time in the current crawl or if their hotspot rank increased significantly compared to previous crawls. The system tracks topic emergence velocity (how quickly a topic rises in rankings) and flags topics with unusual acceleration. New topic detection is performed at report generation time, enabling dynamic detection without re-crawling. The system maintains a historical hotspot index for comparison.
Unique: Detects new topics by comparing current hotspot rankings against historical data, marking topics with significant rank increases as 🆕. Tracks emergence velocity to distinguish breaking news from sustained trends.
vs alternatives: More efficient than semantic similarity detection (no LLM overhead) and more accurate than simple first-appearance detection (accounts for re-emerging topics), but requires historical baseline data.
Provides a web-based UI for editing TrendRadar configuration files (config.yaml, frequency_words.txt, timeline.yaml) with real-time validation and preview. The editor supports: (1) syntax highlighting for YAML and regex, (2) validation of keyword patterns (regex compilation check), (3) preview of filtered results based on current keyword configuration, (4) drag-and-drop channel configuration, (5) schedule preview (shows next 10 execution times). Changes are validated before saving, preventing configuration errors. The editor is optional; users can edit config files directly.
Unique: Provides web-based configuration editor with real-time validation, regex preview, and schedule visualization. Enables non-technical users to configure TrendRadar without editing YAML files.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual YAML editing and provides validation feedback, but adds operational complexity compared to file-based configuration.
Integrates LiteLLM to provide vendor-agnostic AI analysis and summarization of filtered news items. Users configure their preferred LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models, etc.) once in config.yaml, and the system automatically routes analysis requests to that provider. The AI analysis capability includes: (1) automated summarization of long articles into key points, (2) sentiment analysis (positive/negative/neutral), (3) trend prediction based on historical patterns, and (4) custom analysis prompts. Analysis results are cached to avoid redundant API calls and can be pushed directly to notification channels.
Unique: Uses LiteLLM abstraction layer to support any LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models) with single configuration, enabling provider switching without code changes. Caches analysis results to reduce redundant API calls and costs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded OpenAI integration (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than dedicated sentiment analysis APIs (can use local models), but slower than rule-based sentiment analysis.
Leverages LiteLLM to translate news content from source languages (primarily Chinese) to target languages (English, etc.) on-demand. The system detects source language automatically (via langdetect or similar), caches translations to avoid re-translating identical content, and batches translation requests to reduce API calls. Translations are stored alongside original content, enabling bilingual reports and multi-language notification delivery. Translation can be triggered at collection time (all news) or report time (only filtered news).
Unique: Implements provider-agnostic translation via LiteLLM with automatic language detection, content-based caching, and batch request optimization. Stores translations alongside originals for bilingual report generation.
vs alternatives: More flexible than dedicated translation APIs (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than commercial translation services when using local models, but slower than specialized translation APIs.
Implements a notification abstraction layer supporting 9+ delivery channels (WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc.). Each channel has a provider-specific formatter that converts normalized news items into channel-appropriate messages (e.g., WeChat card format, Telegram markdown, email HTML). The system batches notifications atomically—all news items for a report are sent as a single batch to each channel, ensuring consistency and reducing API calls. Message formatting respects channel constraints (character limits, attachment limits, etc.) and supports templating for customization.
Unique: Implements atomic message batching across 9+ heterogeneous channels with provider-specific formatters and constraint-aware truncation. Single configuration enables simultaneous delivery to WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc. without code changes.
vs alternatives: Supports more channels (especially Chinese platforms like WeWork, Feishu) than generic notification services, and batching reduces API calls and spam compared to per-item notifications.
Exposes TrendRadar's data and analysis capabilities as an MCP server, enabling AI agents and LLM applications to query trends, perform analysis, and generate insights through natural language. The MCP server implements tools for: (1) querying filtered news by keyword/date/platform, (2) retrieving trend statistics and hotspot rankings, (3) running custom analysis on news subsets, (4) generating reports in various formats. Clients (Claude, other LLM agents) can invoke these tools via MCP protocol, enabling conversational exploration of trends without direct database access. The server maintains state across multiple requests, allowing multi-turn conversations about trends.
Unique: Implements full MCP server exposing trend data and analysis tools to LLM agents, enabling conversational queries and multi-turn analysis workflows. Maintains state across requests and supports complex tool invocations (filtering, analysis, report generation).
vs alternatives: Enables conversational access to trends (vs. API-only access) and integrates with LLM agent workflows (vs. standalone tools), but adds operational complexity compared to simple REST APIs.
+4 more capabilities