| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
InternLM2.5 and InternLM2 chat models support conversational interactions across multiple languages with a 200K token context window, enabling long-form document analysis and multi-turn dialogue. The models are fine-tuned via supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on instruction-following datasets, allowing them to follow complex user directives while maintaining coherence across extended conversations. This is implemented through standard transformer decoder architecture with rotary position embeddings (RoPE) scaled for long-context handling.
Unique: Achieves 200K context window through efficient RoPE scaling and training on long-context data, compared to most open models capped at 4K-32K; InternLM2.5 adds 1M token support via continued pretraining with specialized position interpolation techniques
vs alternatives: Longer context window than Llama 2 (4K) and comparable to Llama 3 (8K) while maintaining stronger multilingual and reasoning capabilities; more efficient than Claude for cost-conscious deployments
InternLM3 introduces a specialized 'deep thinking mode' that enables the model to perform extended chain-of-thought reasoning for complex mathematical problems, logic puzzles, and multi-step reasoning tasks. This mode works by allowing the model to generate internal reasoning traces before producing final answers, implemented through a two-stage generation process: first generating hidden reasoning tokens (not shown to users), then producing the final response. The architecture uses a modified attention mechanism that allows the model to 'think' without token budget constraints on visible output.
Unique: Implements hidden reasoning tokens that don't consume user-visible token budget, allowing extended thinking without inflating output length; trained with only 4 trillion tokens (vs 8T+ for competing models) through efficient reasoning-focused pretraining
vs alternatives: More efficient reasoning than o1-preview (requires fewer total tokens) while maintaining comparable accuracy on math benchmarks; faster than Llama 3.1 with extended thinking due to optimized attention patterns
InternLM is expanding into multi-modal capabilities through integration with vision encoders, enabling models to process images alongside text. This is implemented by combining a vision encoder (e.g., CLIP-based) with the language model backbone, where images are encoded to visual tokens and concatenated with text tokens in the input sequence. The model learns to reason about both visual and textual information through instruction-tuning on image-text datasets. This enables applications like image captioning, visual question answering, and document understanding from scanned PDFs.
Unique: Integrates vision encoders with InternLM's strong language capabilities, enabling both visual understanding and complex reasoning in a single model; still emerging but positioned to compete with GPT-4V
vs alternatives: Open-source alternative to GPT-4V and Claude 3 Vision; comparable capabilities but with full transparency and local deployment option
InternLM provides support for deployment on NPUs (Neural Processing Units) such as Huawei Ascend, enabling efficient inference on edge devices and specialized hardware. This is implemented through model quantization (int8, int4) and NPU-specific optimization passes that convert standard transformer operations to NPU-native operations. The framework handles model compilation, memory management, and operator fusion for NPU targets. This enables deployment of InternLM models on edge devices with significantly reduced latency and power consumption compared to GPU inference.
Unique: Provides first-class NPU support through LMDeploy integration, enabling efficient deployment on Huawei Ascend and other NPU hardware; includes quantization and operator fusion optimizations specific to NPU architectures
vs alternatives: Enables edge deployment on NPU hardware where GPU options are unavailable; comparable to ONNX Runtime for NPU but with tighter integration to InternLM models
InternLM provides tools for converting models between different formats and frameworks, including conversion to ONNX, TensorRT, and other inference-optimized formats. The conversion pipeline handles weight transformation, operator mapping, and format-specific optimizations. This enables deployment of InternLM models in diverse inference environments (ONNX Runtime, TensorRT, TVM, etc.) without retraining. The tools also support quantization during conversion, enabling efficient deployment on resource-constrained devices.
Unique: Provides integrated conversion pipeline with quantization support, enabling one-command conversion to multiple target formats; includes validation tools to detect conversion errors
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than generic ONNX converters due to InternLM-specific optimizations; comparable to Hugging Face's conversion tools but with better support for quantization and edge deployment
InternLM2.5 and InternLM2 models support structured function calling through a schema-based approach where tools are defined as JSON schemas and the model learns to emit properly formatted tool calls within its generation. The implementation uses a special token vocabulary for tool invocation and integrates with frameworks like LMDeploy and SGLang that parse model outputs and route calls to registered functions. This enables agentic workflows where the model can autonomously decide when and how to use external tools (APIs, calculators, databases) based on user intent.
Unique: Uses special token vocabulary for tool invocation rather than relying on prompt-based function calling, enabling more reliable parsing and lower latency; integrates tightly with LMDeploy's constrained generation to enforce schema compliance
vs alternatives: More reliable tool calling than Llama 2 (which uses prompt-based approach) due to token-level constraints; comparable to GPT-4's function calling but with open-source transparency and local deployment capability
InternLM models are trained on large code corpora and support code generation, completion, and understanding tasks across 40+ programming languages. The models learn to generate syntactically correct code through exposure to high-quality open-source repositories during pretraining. Code understanding is enhanced through instruction-tuning on code-related tasks (debugging, explanation, optimization). The architecture uses standard transformer attention but benefits from code-specific tokenization that preserves syntax structure, enabling better handling of indentation and bracket matching.
Unique: Trained on diverse code corpora with syntax-aware tokenization that preserves indentation and bracket structure, enabling better code generation than models using generic tokenizers; InternLM2.5 adds improved reasoning for complex algorithmic problems
vs alternatives: Comparable code generation to Codex/GPT-4 on standard benchmarks while being fully open-source and deployable locally; stronger than Llama 2 on code tasks due to more extensive code-specific instruction tuning
InternLM2.5 extends context handling to 1 million tokens through continued pretraining with specialized position interpolation techniques and efficient attention mechanisms. The implementation uses a combination of RoPE scaling, grouped-query attention (GQA) for memory efficiency, and training on synthetic long-context data to enable processing of entire books, codebases, or document collections in a single context window. This is achieved without catastrophic forgetting of the base 200K capability through careful curriculum learning during continued pretraining.
Unique: Achieves 1M token context through position interpolation and continued pretraining rather than architectural changes, maintaining compatibility with standard transformer inference; uses grouped-query attention (GQA) to reduce KV cache memory from O(n) to O(n/g) where g is group size
vs alternatives: Longer context than Llama 3.1 (128K) and comparable to Claude 3 (200K) while being open-source; more memory-efficient than naive long-context approaches due to GQA and optimized position encoding
+5 more capabilities
Provides a standardized evaluation framework for code generation models that accepts generated code in 17 programming languages (C, C++, C#, Java, Kotlin, Go, Rust, Python, Ruby, PHP, JavaScript, Perl, Haskell, OCaml, Scala, D, Pascal) and validates correctness through actual execution against unit tests via the ExecEval Docker-based execution engine. Uses a centralized problem definition model with src_uid foreign keys linking generated code to shared problem descriptions and unittest_db.json, enabling consistent evaluation across language variants of the same problem.
Unique: Combines 25M training examples across 7,500 unique problems with an execution-based evaluation pipeline (ExecEval) that actually runs generated code in Docker containers against unit tests, rather than relying on static analysis or string matching. The src_uid linking system creates a normalized data model where problem descriptions and tests are stored once and referenced by all language variants, eliminating duplication and ensuring consistency.
vs alternatives: Larger scale (25M examples vs typical 10-100K) and true execution-based validation across more languages (17 vs 4-6) than HumanEval or CodeXGLUE, with explicit support for code translation and repair tasks beyond generation.
Implements a foreign key linking system where all task-specific datasets (program synthesis, code translation, APR, retrieval) reference shared problem definitions via src_uid identifiers. Problem descriptions and unit tests are stored once in centralized problem_descriptions.jsonl and unittest_db.json files, then linked by src_uid to avoid duplication. The Hugging Face datasets API automatically resolves these links during data loading, returning enriched DatasetDict objects with problem context pre-joined to task examples.
Unique: Uses a normalized relational data model (src_uid as foreign key) for a code benchmark, treating problem definitions as a separate entity layer rather than embedding them in each task dataset. This is more sophisticated than typical flat-file benchmark structures and enables consistent multi-task evaluation on identical problems.
xCodeEval scores higher at 67/100 vs InternLM at 58/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More efficient than duplicating problem descriptions across 7 task datasets (reduces storage by ~30-40%), and enables automatic link resolution via Hugging Face API unlike manual CSV joins in CodeXGLUE or HumanEval variants.
Provides a Python API for loading xCodeEval datasets from Hugging Face Hub (NTU-NLP-sg/xCodeEval) with automatic src_uid-based linking between task datasets and shared problem definitions. The datasets library handles data downloading, caching, and streaming, while the xCodeEval integration automatically joins task examples with problem_descriptions.jsonl and unittest_db.json using src_uid foreign keys. Returns DatasetDict objects with enriched examples ready for model training or evaluation.
Unique: Integrates xCodeEval with Hugging Face datasets library, providing automatic src_uid resolution and streaming support. Treats data loading as a first-class concern with built-in linking logic, rather than requiring manual JSON parsing.
vs alternatives: More convenient than manual Git LFS downloads because it handles caching and automatic linking, and integrates seamlessly with Hugging Face training pipelines vs custom data loaders.
Provides an alternative data access method using Git LFS for users who prefer direct file access or need selective dataset downloads. Supports cloning the repository with LFS disabled, then pulling specific task files or problem definitions on demand. Useful for custom processing pipelines or environments where Python/Hugging Face is not available, though requires manual src_uid linking to join task examples with problem definitions.
Unique: Provides Git LFS-based alternative to Hugging Face API, enabling direct file access and selective downloads. Requires manual src_uid linking but offers more control over data access patterns.
vs alternatives: More flexible than Hugging Face API for selective downloads and custom pipelines, but requires more manual work for src_uid linking and lacks automatic caching/streaming.
Implements a standardized three-phase evaluation pipeline (Phase 1: Generation, Phase 2: Execution, Phase 3: Metrics) that applies consistently across all 7 tasks (program synthesis, code translation, APR, tag classification, code compilation, NL-code retrieval, code-code retrieval). Phase 1 generates or retrieves code, Phase 2 executes it via ExecEval or computes retrieval metrics, and Phase 3 aggregates results into pass@k, MRR, NDCG, or other task-specific metrics. Enables direct comparison of model performance across tasks.
Unique: Defines a unified three-phase evaluation pipeline that applies to all 7 tasks, treating generation, execution, and metric computation as separate concerns. Enables consistent evaluation methodology across diverse task types (generation, translation, retrieval, classification).
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than task-specific evaluation scripts because it provides a unified framework for all 7 tasks, and enables direct comparison of model performance across different task types.
Evaluates code generation models on the program synthesis task by accepting natural language problem descriptions and generating code solutions in any of 17 languages. The evaluation pipeline (Phase 1: Generation, Phase 2: Execution, Phase 3: Metrics) runs generated code against unit tests via ExecEval, computing pass@k metrics (pass@1, pass@10, etc.) that measure the probability of finding a correct solution within k samples. Supports both single-solution and multi-sample evaluation modes for assessing model reliability.
Unique: Implements a three-phase evaluation pipeline (Generation → Execution → Metrics) with explicit pass@k computation that measures the probability of finding a correct solution within k attempts, rather than just binary pass/fail. Supports multi-sample evaluation across 17 languages with language-specific compiler configurations and timeout handling.
vs alternatives: More rigorous than HumanEval's simple pass@k because it handles language-specific compilation errors and timeouts explicitly, and scales to 25M training examples vs HumanEval's 164 problems.
Evaluates code translation models by accepting source code in one language and generated translations in a target language, then validating functional equivalence through execution against shared unit tests. The translation evaluation pipeline compiles and executes both source and translated code against the same unittest_db.json test cases, comparing outputs to detect translation errors. Supports all 17 language pairs (though not all pairs may have training data) and uses language-specific compiler mappings to handle syntax differences.
Unique: Validates code translation by executing both source and target code against identical unit tests and comparing outputs, ensuring functional equivalence rather than syntactic similarity. Uses language-specific compiler mappings to handle the complexity of 17 different compilation environments and their idiosyncrasies.
vs alternatives: More rigorous than BLEU-score-based translation metrics because it validates actual functional correctness through execution, and covers more language pairs (17 vs typical 2-4) with explicit compiler integration.
Evaluates program repair models by providing buggy code snippets and expecting corrected versions that pass unit tests. The APR evaluation pipeline executes repaired code against unittest_db.json test cases, measuring whether the repair successfully fixes the bug without introducing new failures. Supports repairs across all 17 languages and uses the same execution-based validation as program synthesis, enabling direct comparison of repair quality.
Unique: Treats program repair as an executable task where success is measured by unit test passage, rather than syntactic similarity to reference repairs. Integrates with the same ExecEval pipeline as program synthesis, enabling direct performance comparison between generation and repair models.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than traditional APR benchmarks (Defects4J, QuixBugs) because it covers 17 languages and 7,500 problems vs 395 Java bugs, and uses consistent execution-based metrics across all repair types.
+5 more capabilities