| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Converts unified Markdown-based agent definitions (with YAML frontmatter) into tool-specific formats via a two-stage bash/PowerShell pipeline (convert.sh → install.sh). The convert stage parses raw agent files and transforms them into 14+ target formats (.mdc for Cursor, .json for Kiro, aggregated files for Aider/Windsurf, rules for Claude Code/Copilot). The install stage auto-detects local tool installations and deploys converted agents to the correct configuration directories (~/.claude/agents/, .cursor/rules/, etc.), eliminating manual file placement.
Unique: Implements a declarative, tool-agnostic agent definition format (Markdown + YAML) with automated format transpilation and filesystem-aware installation detection. Unlike tool-specific agent builders, this approach treats agent definitions as infrastructure-as-code, enabling version control, CI/CD validation, and cross-tool portability without vendor lock-in.
vs alternatives: Outperforms manual agent creation workflows by eliminating per-tool reformatting; more flexible than tool-native agent stores because agents remain portable and auditable in git.
Organizes 211 pre-built AI agent personas across 18 professional departments (Engineering, Design, Marketing, Sales, Support, Testing, Finance, Legal, HR, Academic, Game Development, Supply Chain, etc.) with 46 agents specifically designed for Chinese platforms (Xiaohongshu, Douyin, WeChat, Feishu, DingTalk). Each agent is defined as a Markdown file containing YAML metadata (name, department, tools, version) and a structured body (identity/mission/rules/deliverables). The library is indexed and linted via CI/CD to ensure consistency and completeness.
Unique: Combines a structured, version-controlled agent library with deep Chinese market specialization (46 original agents for Xiaohongshu, Douyin, WeChat, Feishu, DingTalk) and a standardized YAML+Markdown definition format that enables both human readability and machine parsing. Unlike generic prompt repositories, this library enforces consistent structure (identity/mission/rules/deliverables) and department taxonomy, making agents discoverable and composable.
vs alternatives: Provides 211 pre-built agents vs. starting from scratch; Chinese market agents are unavailable in generic libraries like Awesome Prompts; standardized format enables automated validation and cross-tool deployment.
Integrates with OpenClaw (a workspace management tool) to enable unified deployment and management of agents across multiple tools and projects. OpenClaw provides a centralized interface for selecting, configuring, and deploying agents to local development environments. The integration leverages the conversion pipeline to automatically deploy agents to the correct tool-specific formats and directories. This reduces friction for teams that use multiple tools and want a single point of control for agent deployment.
Unique: Provides a centralized workspace interface for agent deployment, treating agent management as a workspace concern rather than a per-tool concern. This approach simplifies deployment for teams using multiple tools and enables centralized governance.
vs alternatives: More convenient than manual per-tool deployment; enables team-wide standardization on agent definitions; provides a single point of control for agent versions and configurations.
Provides pre-defined scenario runbooks (e.g., 'xiaohongshu-launch', 'product-development', 'infrastructure-deployment') that orchestrate multiple agents through a complete workflow. Each runbook specifies the sequence of agents, handoff protocols, validation checkpoints, and expected outputs. Runbooks are defined in Markdown and can be executed via the NEXUS orchestration framework or manually. This enables teams to standardize on repeatable workflows without building orchestration logic from scratch.
Unique: Treats common workflows as first-class artifacts, providing pre-built runbooks that encode best practices and institutional knowledge. Unlike ad-hoc agent chaining, runbooks are documented, version-controlled, and repeatable, making them suitable for team-wide standardization.
vs alternatives: More structured than manual agent chaining; more flexible than hard-coded workflows because runbooks are text-based and customizable; enables non-technical users to execute complex workflows.
Provides standardized templates and contribution guidelines for adding new agents to the library. Contributors create a Markdown file with YAML frontmatter (metadata) and a structured body (identity, mission, rules, deliverables) following the template. The contribution process includes validation via the linter, peer review, and integration into the appropriate department. The framework ensures consistency across all 211 agents and makes it easy for community members to contribute without understanding the entire codebase.
Unique: Treats agent contribution as a structured, templated process rather than ad-hoc submissions. The framework lowers the barrier to entry for contributors while ensuring quality and consistency through automated validation and peer review.
vs alternatives: More accessible than contributing to generic prompt repositories because templates guide contributors; more consistent than ad-hoc contributions because templates enforce structure; enables community-driven library growth.
Implements a 7-phase orchestration framework (Phases 0–6) for coordinating multiple agents on complex tasks. Each phase defines entry conditions, agent responsibilities, handoff protocols, and validation checkpoints. Agents communicate via standardized handoff templates that specify context, constraints, and expected outputs. The framework includes scenario runbooks (pre-defined workflows for common patterns like 'product launch', 'content creation', 'infrastructure deployment') and agent coordination templates that define who hands off to whom and under what conditions. Implemented via the agency-orchestrator NPM package for programmatic control.
Unique: Defines a formal 7-phase lifecycle with explicit handoff protocols and scenario runbooks, treating multi-agent coordination as a first-class concern rather than an afterthought. Unlike simple agent chaining (e.g., 'call Agent A, then Agent B'), NEXUS enforces validation checkpoints, context preservation, and role-based routing, making workflows auditable and repeatable.
vs alternatives: More structured than LangChain's sequential chains (which lack formal phase definitions); more flexible than rigid state machines because phases can branch based on validation results; includes pre-built runbooks for common scenarios (product launch, content creation).
Converts agent definitions into .mdc (Markdown with Code) rule files for Cursor, Trae, and OpenCode, which use a rules-based system to inject agent personas into the IDE's code completion and suggestion engine. The conversion process extracts the agent's identity, mission, and rules from the Markdown definition and formats them as a .cursor/rules/ file that the IDE loads at startup. Rules are applied contextually — the IDE evaluates them against the current file, selection, and command to determine which agent persona should influence suggestions. This enables IDE-native agent switching without leaving the editor.
Unique: Treats IDE rule files as a deployment target for agent definitions, enabling IDE-native agent personas without external API calls. The conversion process preserves agent semantics (identity, mission, rules) while adapting them to the IDE's rule syntax, making agents portable across different rule-based IDEs.
vs alternatives: Faster than external agent APIs because rules are evaluated locally in the IDE; more flexible than hard-coded IDE behaviors because rules are version-controlled and updatable; enables agent switching without IDE restart.
Provides agent definitions formatted as copy-paste system prompts for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot, which do not support external rule files or configuration. The conversion process extracts the agent's identity, mission, and rules from the Markdown definition and formats them as a plain-text system prompt that can be pasted directly into Claude Code's system prompt field or GitHub Copilot's settings. This is the simplest integration path but requires manual copy-paste and does not support dynamic agent switching within a session.
Unique: Provides the simplest possible integration path for tools that don't support external configuration — plain-text system prompts that can be copy-pasted. This approach prioritizes transparency and simplicity over automation, making it ideal for users who want to inspect and customize prompts.
vs alternatives: More transparent than automated integrations because users can see the exact prompt being used; simpler to set up than rule-based integrations; works with any tool that accepts system prompts.
+5 more capabilities
Automatically loads and parses documents from diverse sources (PDFs, Word docs, HTML, Markdown, code files, databases) into a unified in-memory representation using format-specific loaders and node-based document abstractions. Each document is decomposed into Document objects containing metadata, content, and relationships, enabling downstream processing without format-specific handling in application code.
Unique: Provides a unified loader abstraction (BaseReader interface) that normalizes 100+ data source connectors into a single Document/Node API, eliminating format-specific branching logic in application code. Loaders are composable and chainable, allowing sequential transformations (e.g., load → split → extract metadata → embed).
vs alternatives: Broader out-of-the-box loader coverage than LangChain's document loaders and more structured node-based decomposition than raw text splitting, reducing boilerplate for multi-source RAG pipelines.
Splits documents into semantically coherent chunks using multiple strategies (character-based, token-aware, recursive, semantic) with configurable overlap and chunk size. Preserves document hierarchy and metadata through a node tree structure, enabling retrieval systems to maintain context relationships and enable hierarchical re-ranking or parent-document retrieval patterns.
Unique: Implements a node-tree abstraction that preserves document hierarchy and enables parent-document retrieval patterns. Supports multiple splitting strategies (recursive, semantic, code-aware) with pluggable custom splitters, and automatically propagates metadata through the node tree.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than LangChain's text splitters because it preserves hierarchical relationships and supports semantic splitting; better for complex document structures than simple character-based splitting.
agency-agents-zh scores higher at 46/100 vs LlamaIndex at 40/100. agency-agents-zh also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Processes documents containing mixed content (text, images, tables, code) by extracting and understanding each modality separately, then synthesizing information across modalities. Uses vision models for image understanding, specialized parsers for tables and code, and integrates results into a unified document representation for retrieval and generation.
Unique: Integrates vision models, table parsers, and code extractors into a unified multi-modal document processing pipeline that synthesizes information across modalities. Preserves modality-specific structure (table schemas, code formatting) while enabling cross-modal retrieval and generation.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive multi-modal support than text-only RAG; built-in vision integration reduces boilerplate for document understanding compared to manual vision API calls.
Enables streaming of LLM responses token-by-token and real-time retrieval updates, allowing applications to display partial results as they become available. Supports streaming from retrieval (progressive document discovery) and generation (token-by-token output) with backpressure handling and cancellation support for responsive user experiences.
Unique: Provides first-class streaming support for both retrieval and generation with automatic backpressure handling and cancellation. Enables progressive result display without custom async/streaming code in application layer.
vs alternatives: More integrated streaming support than manual LLM API streaming; built-in retrieval streaming and backpressure handling reduce complexity compared to custom streaming implementations.
Tracks API costs for LLM calls, embeddings, and other operations with per-query and per-session cost attribution. Provides cost optimization recommendations (e.g., batch processing, model selection, caching) and enables cost-aware query planning to balance quality and expense. Integrates with multiple LLM providers to normalize cost tracking across models.
Unique: Provides automatic cost tracking across multiple LLM providers with per-query attribution and cost optimization recommendations. Integrates with query execution to enable cost-aware planning without manual cost calculation.
vs alternatives: More integrated cost tracking than manual API billing review; built-in optimization recommendations reduce guesswork for cost reduction.
Enables building custom RAG pipelines by composing modular components (retrievers, synthesizers, agents, tools) through a declarative or programmatic API. Supports complex workflows with branching, loops, and conditional logic, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Pipelines are reusable, testable, and can be deployed as APIs or batch jobs.
Unique: Provides a flexible pipeline composition API supporting both declarative and programmatic definitions, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Enables complex workflows with branching and conditional logic without custom orchestration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible pipeline composition than fixed RAG architectures; better workflow support than manual component chaining.
Generates embeddings for documents/nodes using pluggable embedding providers (OpenAI, Hugging Face, local models) and stores them in a unified vector store interface that abstracts over multiple backends (Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, FAISS, Chroma, etc.). The abstraction layer enables switching vector stores without changing application code, and handles batching, retry logic, and metadata indexing.
Unique: Provides a unified VectorStore interface that abstracts 10+ vector database backends, enabling zero-code switching between providers. Handles embedding batching, retry logic, and metadata propagation automatically. Supports both cloud and local embedding models through a pluggable EmbedModel interface.
vs alternatives: Broader vector store coverage and more seamless provider switching than LangChain's vectorstore integrations; better abstraction consistency across backends than using raw vector store SDKs directly.
Retrieves semantically similar documents from vector stores using embedding-based similarity search, with optional re-ranking, filtering, and fusion strategies (hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval). Supports multiple retrieval modes (similarity, MMR, fusion) and enables custom retrieval logic through a pluggable Retriever interface that can combine multiple strategies.
Unique: Implements a pluggable Retriever abstraction supporting multiple retrieval strategies (similarity, MMR, fusion, custom) that can be composed and chained. Built-in support for re-ranking via LLM or cross-encoder, and hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval without custom integration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible retrieval composition than LangChain's retrievers; built-in re-ranking and fusion strategies reduce boilerplate for advanced retrieval pipelines.
+6 more capabilities