| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Provides context-aware code suggestions during typing by analyzing the current file and broader project context. The extension integrates with VS Code's IntelliSense API to inject AI-generated completions alongside native language server suggestions, leveraging the Continue framework's context extraction to understand project structure and coding patterns without requiring explicit configuration.
Unique: Built on Continue framework with Russia-specific optimization (works without VPN), providing project-context-aware completions integrated directly into VS Code's IntelliSense rather than as a separate overlay, though specific context extraction depth and scope are undocumented
vs alternatives: Optimized for Russian developers and regions with network restrictions (no VPN required), unlike GitHub Copilot which requires standard internet access, though specific performance and context-awareness advantages over Copilot are unverified
Provides a sidebar chat interface where developers can ask questions about their code, request explanations, and discuss implementation approaches. The chat mode claims to understand project context by analyzing files and structure, enabling multi-turn conversations where the AI maintains awareness of the codebase across multiple exchanges without requiring explicit file references in each message.
Unique: Integrates Continue framework's project context extraction into a sidebar chat interface with claimed multi-turn awareness of project structure, though the specific mechanism for maintaining and updating project context across conversations is undocumented
vs alternatives: Provides project-aware conversational assistance integrated into VS Code sidebar (unlike web-based ChatGPT), though context extraction depth and accuracy compared to GitHub Copilot Chat are unverified
Enables searching and retrieving relevant documentation from external sources and user-provided data using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). The retrieval mode allows developers to load custom data sources (format and limits unknown) and query them with natural language, with the AI augmenting responses by combining retrieved documents with its knowledge to provide contextually relevant answers.
Unique: Implements RAG mode with support for user-provided data sources (specific formats unknown), integrated into VS Code extension rather than as standalone tool, though data loading mechanism and retrieval algorithm specifics are undocumented
vs alternatives: Allows augmenting AI responses with custom organizational data unlike generic ChatGPT or Copilot, though retrieval accuracy and data handling compared to specialized RAG platforms like Pinecone or Weaviate are unverified
Provides an agent mode that breaks down complex development tasks into subtasks and executes them in sequence with minimal user intervention. The agent analyzes task intent, decomposes it into actionable steps, and orchestrates execution across multiple operations (code generation, file modifications, command execution scope unknown) while maintaining context across steps.
Unique: Implements agent-based task automation integrated into VS Code extension with claimed multi-step execution and context maintenance, though specific execution scope, safety mechanisms, and error handling are entirely undocumented
vs alternatives: Provides integrated agent automation within VS Code (unlike separate CLI tools or web-based agents), though execution capabilities, safety guarantees, and reliability compared to specialized automation frameworks are unverified
Supports multiple AI model providers and models (specific providers and models unknown) with the ability to switch between them for different tasks. The extension abstracts model selection through a configuration layer, allowing developers to choose which AI provider powers each capability (completion, chat, retrieval, agent) based on cost, latency, or capability preferences.
Unique: Abstracts multiple AI model providers through a unified interface (likely inherited from Continue framework), allowing per-capability model selection, though specific supported providers, configuration mechanism, and model-switching logic are undocumented
vs alternatives: Provides flexibility to use multiple AI providers unlike single-provider tools like GitHub Copilot (OpenAI-only) or Claude-only extensions, though configuration complexity and provider support breadth compared to Continue framework directly are unverified
Provides native support for Russian and English languages across all capabilities (completion, chat, retrieval, agent) with region-specific optimization for Russian developers. The extension works without requiring VPN in Russia and other regions with network restrictions, suggesting custom routing or API endpoint configuration that bypasses standard internet access patterns.
Unique: Implements region-specific connectivity optimization for Russia (works without VPN) with native Russian language support across all capabilities, a differentiation from global AI tools that typically require standard internet access and may not optimize for Russian language quality
vs alternatives: Eliminates VPN requirement for Russian developers unlike GitHub Copilot or ChatGPT, and provides native Russian language support, though specific language quality and region coverage compared to other Russian-optimized AI tools are unverified
Built on the open-source Continue framework, inheriting its modular architecture for context extraction, model abstraction, and capability orchestration. This foundation allows Koda to leverage Continue's ecosystem of integrations, context providers, and model adapters while adding region-specific customizations and UI enhancements for VS Code.
Unique: Leverages Continue framework's modular architecture as foundation, adding region-specific optimizations (Russia, no-VPN) and VS Code integration on top of Continue's context extraction and model abstraction layers, though Koda-specific extensions or customizations are undocumented
vs alternatives: Inherits Continue framework's flexibility and extensibility (unlike monolithic tools like GitHub Copilot), though specific Koda customizations and extension capabilities compared to using Continue directly are unverified
Operates on a freemium pricing model where some features or usage levels are free while others require payment. The specific features included in free vs. paid tiers, usage limits, pricing structure, and upgrade paths are entirely undocumented, requiring users to discover pricing details through the extension marketplace or in-app prompts.
Unique: Implements freemium model (specific tier structure unknown) as alternative to GitHub Copilot's subscription-only model, though pricing transparency and tier differentiation are entirely undocumented
vs alternatives: Offers free tier entry point unlike GitHub Copilot ($10/month) or Claude API (pay-as-you-go), though actual free tier limitations and paid tier pricing compared to alternatives are unverified
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs Koda at 34/100. Koda leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities