Firecrawl MCP Server ranks higher at 62/100 vs Linear MCP Server at 60/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Linear MCP Server | Firecrawl MCP Server |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | MCP Server |
| UnfragileRank | 60/100 | 62/100 |
| Adoption | 1 | 1 |
| Quality | 1 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Creates new Linear issues through MCP tool invocation by translating LLM natural language requests into Linear API mutations. The server validates required parameters (title, teamId) and optional fields (description, priority, status), then queues the request through a rate-limited client that enforces Linear's 1400 requests/hour limit. Returns structured issue metadata including ID, URL, and status for LLM context.
Unique: Implements MCP tool schema with Linear-specific parameter validation and rate-limit-aware queueing, ensuring LLM requests respect API quotas without blocking the client. Uses LinearMCPClient abstraction to decouple protocol handling from API integration.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom Linear integrations because it handles MCP protocol translation and rate limiting automatically, while remaining more flexible than Linear's native Slack/GitHub integrations by supporting any MCP-compatible LLM client.
Searches Linear issues using a query string combined with optional filters (teamId, status, assigneeId, labels, priority) by translating them into Linear GraphQL queries. The server constructs parameterized queries that filter across multiple dimensions simultaneously, returning paginated results with issue metadata. Supports both full-text search on title/description and structured filtering on issue properties.
Unique: Combines full-text search with structured filtering through a single MCP tool, allowing LLMs to express complex queries naturally ('find open bugs assigned to me') without requiring users to learn Linear's filter syntax. Rate limiter ensures search requests don't exhaust API quota.
vs alternatives: More flexible than Linear's built-in saved views because it accepts dynamic filter parameters from LLM context, and simpler than building custom GraphQL clients because the MCP server handles query construction and pagination.
Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server specification by handling MCP requests (list resources, read resource, list tools, call tool) from LLM clients via stdio transport. The server translates MCP tool invocations into LinearMCPClient method calls and formats responses back to the protocol format. Exposes tool schemas that describe available operations and their parameters to the LLM client.
Unique: Implements full MCP server specification with stdio transport, enabling seamless integration with Claude Desktop and other MCP-compatible clients. Tool schemas are statically defined but cover all major Linear operations.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom REST APIs because MCP handles protocol translation automatically, and more flexible than Linear's native integrations because it works with any MCP-compatible LLM client.
Handles errors from Linear API calls and formats them as MCP-compliant error responses that LLMs can interpret. The server catches API errors (authentication failures, invalid parameters, rate limit errors) and serializes them with descriptive messages and error codes. Ensures that LLM clients receive actionable error information rather than raw API responses.
Unique: Translates Linear API errors into MCP-compliant error responses with descriptive messages, enabling LLM clients to understand failures without exposing raw API details. Error handling is transparent to MCP tools.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than raw API errors because it provides MCP-formatted messages, and simpler than building custom error recovery because it delegates retry logic to the LLM client.
Defines MCP resource templates that allow clients to request issue data using URI patterns (e.g., 'linear://issue/{issueId}'), enabling LLMs to reference issues as persistent resources rather than one-off API calls. The server implements resource reading that fetches issue details when a client requests a resource URI, integrating issue context into the LLM's knowledge base.
Unique: Implements MCP resource templates for issues, allowing LLMs to treat Linear issues as first-class resources in the conversation context rather than requiring explicit tool calls
vs alternatives: More seamless than tool-based issue fetching because users can paste issue URIs directly; simpler than building a separate context manager because it leverages MCP's native resource protocol
Updates existing Linear issues by accepting an issue ID and a set of fields to modify (title, description, priority, status, assignee). The server constructs targeted GraphQL mutations that update only specified fields, avoiding unnecessary API calls or conflicts from partial updates. Returns the updated issue state to confirm changes to the LLM client.
Unique: Implements selective field updates through GraphQL mutations rather than full-object replacement, reducing API payload size and avoiding unnecessary field overwrites. Rate limiter queues mutations to respect Linear's request limits.
vs alternatives: More granular than Linear's REST API because it updates only specified fields, and safer than direct GraphQL access because the MCP server validates field names and types before submission.
Retrieves all issues assigned to a specific user by querying the Linear API with userId and optional filters (includeArchived, limit). The server constructs a GraphQL query that fetches the user's issue list with metadata, supporting pagination through limit parameters. Returns issues in a format suitable for LLM processing (title, status, priority, team, URL).
Unique: Provides a dedicated user-scoped query path that's more efficient than generic search for the common case of 'show me my issues', with built-in archive filtering to distinguish active from historical work. Integrates with rate limiter to queue requests.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom GraphQL queries because it abstracts away Linear's schema, and more efficient than searching by assigneeId because it's optimized for the single-user case.
Adds comments to Linear issues by accepting an issueId, comment body, and optional parameters for user attribution (createAsUser) and display customization (displayIconUrl). The server constructs a GraphQL mutation that appends the comment to the issue's activity stream. Supports both direct comments and comments attributed to specific users or bots with custom icons.
Unique: Supports optional user attribution and custom icon URLs, enabling LLM agents to post comments that appear to come from specific users or branded bots. Rate limiter queues comment mutations to avoid API quota exhaustion.
vs alternatives: More flexible than Linear's native integrations because it allows custom user attribution and icon customization, and simpler than building custom GraphQL clients because the MCP server handles mutation construction.
+5 more capabilities
Scrapes a single URL and converts HTML content to clean markdown using Firecrawl's content extraction pipeline. The firecrawl_scrape tool accepts a URL and optional parameters (formats, headers, wait time, screenshot capability) and returns structured markdown output with automatic cleanup of boilerplate, navigation, and ads. Implements MCP tool handler pattern that marshals arguments through the @mendable/firecrawl-js client library to Firecrawl's backend processing engine.
Unique: Integrates Firecrawl's proprietary content extraction engine (which uses ML-based boilerplate removal and semantic content identification) through MCP protocol, enabling AI agents to access production-grade web scraping without managing browser automation or parsing logic themselves. The markdown conversion is handled server-side rather than client-side, reducing latency and ensuring consistent output formatting.
vs alternatives: Cleaner markdown output than regex-based scrapers like Cheerio or Puppeteer-only solutions because Firecrawl uses ML models to identify main content; simpler than self-hosted solutions because it's fully managed and requires only an API key.
Scrapes multiple URLs in a single operation using Firecrawl's batch processing pipeline. The firecrawl_batch_scrape tool accepts an array of URLs and shared options, submitting them to Firecrawl's backend which processes them in parallel and returns an array of markdown-converted content objects. Implements batching through the @mendable/firecrawl-js client's batch method, which handles request queuing, parallel execution, and result aggregation without requiring client-side coordination.
Unique: Implements server-side parallel batch processing through Firecrawl's backend rather than client-side loop iteration, reducing network round-trips and enabling true concurrent scraping. The batch operation is atomic from the MCP client perspective — a single tool call returns all results, simplifying agent orchestration logic.
More efficient than sequential scraping loops because Firecrawl handles parallelization server-side; simpler than managing Promise.all() with individual scrape calls because batching is a first-class operation with built-in error handling.
Firecrawl MCP Server scores higher at 62/100 vs Linear MCP Server at 60/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Packages the Firecrawl MCP server as a Docker container with environment-based configuration, enabling deployment to containerized infrastructure (Kubernetes, Docker Compose, cloud platforms). The Dockerfile builds a Node.js runtime with the server code and exposes configuration through environment variables, allowing operators to deploy without modifying code. Supports both cloud and self-hosted Firecrawl instances through configuration.
Unique: Provides production-ready Docker packaging with environment-based configuration, enabling zero-code deployment to containerized infrastructure. The Dockerfile handles Node.js runtime setup and dependency installation, reducing deployment complexity.
vs alternatives: Simpler than manual deployment because Docker handles environment setup; more portable than binary distribution because containers run consistently across platforms.
Registers the Firecrawl MCP server in the Smithery registry, enabling one-click installation and discovery through Smithery's MCP client marketplace. The server is published to Smithery with metadata (description, tags, configuration schema) allowing users to discover and install it without manual setup. Smithery handles server distribution, version management, and client integration.
Unique: Leverages Smithery's MCP server registry to enable one-click installation without manual configuration, reducing friction for end users. Smithery handles server discovery, versioning, and client integration, abstracting deployment complexity.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual installation because Smithery handles discovery and setup; more discoverable than GitHub-only distribution because Smithery provides a centralized marketplace.
Supports connecting to self-hosted Firecrawl instances in addition to Firecrawl's cloud service through configurable API endpoint. The FIRECRAWL_API_URL environment variable allows operators to specify a custom Firecrawl endpoint, enabling deployment scenarios where Firecrawl runs on-premises or in a private cloud. The @mendable/firecrawl-js client library handles endpoint abstraction, routing all API calls to the configured endpoint.
Unique: Enables flexible deployment by supporting both cloud and self-hosted Firecrawl instances through simple endpoint configuration, allowing operators to choose deployment model without code changes. The endpoint abstraction is handled by @mendable/firecrawl-js, making self-hosted support transparent to MCP server code.
vs alternatives: More flexible than cloud-only solutions because self-hosted option is available; simpler than maintaining separate server implementations because endpoint configuration is unified.
Discovers all URLs within a website by crawling from a base URL and building a sitemap-like structure. The firecrawl_map tool accepts a base URL and optional parameters (max depth, include patterns, exclude patterns) and returns a hierarchical array of discovered URLs with metadata about page structure. Uses Firecrawl's crawler to traverse internal links up to specified depth, filtering by inclusion/exclusion patterns, and returns the complete URL graph without fetching full page content.
Unique: Provides lightweight URL discovery without content extraction, allowing agents to plan scraping strategy before committing credits to full content fetches. The depth-based crawling with pattern filtering enables selective discovery — agents can discover only URLs matching specific criteria (e.g., /blog/* paths) without exploring entire site.
vs alternatives: More efficient than scraping every page to build a sitemap because it skips content extraction; more reliable than parsing robots.txt or sitemaps.xml because it performs actual crawling and discovers dynamically-linked content.
Crawls an entire website and extracts content from all discovered pages in a single asynchronous operation. The firecrawl_crawl tool accepts a base URL and options (max pages, allowed domains, exclude patterns, scrape options) and returns a crawl ID for polling. The crawler discovers URLs, extracts markdown content from each page, and stores results server-side. Clients poll firecrawl_crawl_status to retrieve results as they complete, implementing an async job pattern rather than blocking until completion.
Unique: Implements server-side asynchronous crawling with job-based result retrieval, decoupling the crawl initiation from result consumption. The MCP server handles polling coordination through firecrawl_crawl_status, allowing AI agents to initiate long-running crawls and check progress without blocking. Firecrawl's backend manages the entire crawl lifecycle including URL discovery, content extraction, and result storage.
vs alternatives: More scalable than sequential scraping because crawling happens server-side in parallel; simpler than managing Puppeteer/Playwright browser pools because Firecrawl abstracts browser automation and handles rate limiting internally.
Polls the status of an in-progress or completed website crawl and retrieves extracted content. The firecrawl_crawl_status tool accepts a crawl ID and returns current progress (pages crawled, pages remaining, completion percentage), status state (running/completed/failed), and paginated results. Implements polling pattern where clients repeatedly call this tool with the same crawl ID to check progress and incrementally retrieve content as pages are processed, supporting streaming-like result consumption.
Unique: Provides non-blocking status and result retrieval for asynchronous crawls, enabling agents to manage long-running operations without blocking. The polling pattern with pagination allows incremental result consumption — agents can start processing results before the entire crawl completes, reducing end-to-end latency for large crawls.
vs alternatives: More flexible than blocking crawl operations because agents can check progress and retrieve partial results; simpler than webhook-based result delivery because polling requires no external infrastructure setup.
+5 more capabilities