Supermaven ranks higher at 71/100 vs Local AI Pilot - Ollama, Deepseek-R1, and more at 38/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Local AI Pilot - Ollama, Deepseek-R1, and more | Supermaven |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Extension | Extension |
| UnfragileRank | 38/100 | 71/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Provides real-time code suggestions triggered via SHIFT+ALT+W by sending the current file buffer plus explicitly configured context files to a local Ollama instance running models like Deepseek-R1. The extension maintains the full file context in memory and streams completion suggestions back into the editor without sending code to remote servers, enabling privacy-preserving autocomplete that understands multi-file project structure through configurable file path injection.
Unique: Combines local Ollama inference with explicit multi-file context injection (via configurable file paths) rather than relying on LSP-based symbol resolution, enabling reasoning models like Deepseek-R1 to understand cross-file dependencies without cloud connectivity. Uses keyboard shortcut triggering (SHIFT+ALT+W) instead of always-on completion, reducing resource overhead on resource-constrained machines.
vs alternatives: Maintains code privacy and works fully offline unlike GitHub Copilot, while supporting reasoning-optimized models (Deepseek-R1) that outperform smaller local alternatives like Codeium's local mode, though with higher latency trade-offs.
Provides a sidebar chat interface where developers can discuss code, ask questions, and receive explanations through a stateful conversation that persists across sessions. In Container Mode, the extension maintains chat history and caching via an intermediate API service, enabling the LLM to reference previous messages in the conversation thread. Messages are routed through the container API rather than directly to Ollama, allowing for session management and context carryover across multiple interactions.
Unique: Implements stateful conversation persistence via an intermediate container API service (not direct Ollama connection), enabling chat history caching and multi-turn context carryover. Dual-mode architecture (Standalone vs Container) allows users to opt-in to persistence rather than forcing it, reducing resource overhead for privacy-focused users who don't need history.
vs alternatives: Offers persistent chat history for local models (unlike Ollama's stateless API), while maintaining offline capability when using local models, though Container Mode adds architectural complexity and latency compared to direct Ollama connections.
Ensures that code suggestions and repairs are formatted correctly by enforcing LF (Unix-style) line endings throughout the extension. The extension explicitly requires LF line endings in source files and may convert or reject CRLF (Windows-style) line endings to prevent formatting issues in generated code. This constraint is documented as a requirement ('Use LF line endings for proper formatting'), suggesting that CRLF may cause the LLM to generate malformed suggestions or that the extension's parsing logic assumes LF line endings.
Unique: Explicitly enforces LF line endings as a requirement rather than handling both LF and CRLF transparently, suggesting that the extension's parsing or prompt formatting logic is sensitive to line ending style. This is a constraint rather than a feature, but it's important for users to understand to avoid formatting issues.
vs alternatives: Simpler than tools that transparently handle multiple line ending styles, but requires more user configuration; ensures consistent behavior across platforms at the cost of flexibility.
Analyzes selected code blocks by sending them to the configured LLM (local Ollama or remote provider) to generate human-readable explanations of functionality, logic flow, and intent. The extension extracts the selected text from the editor, passes it to the model with an implicit 'explain' prompt, and returns the analysis as text that can be displayed in the chat interface or sidebar. Works with any supported model (Deepseek-R1, OpenAI, Gemini, etc.) and respects the user's privacy mode selection (local vs remote).
Unique: Provides model-agnostic code explanation that works with both local Ollama models and remote providers through a unified interface, allowing users to choose between privacy (local) and capability (remote) without changing workflows. Integrates directly with VS Code's selection mechanism rather than requiring separate tools or copy-paste.
vs alternatives: Simpler and more privacy-preserving than cloud-only tools like GitHub Copilot's explain feature, though potentially lower quality than specialized code understanding models trained on massive codebases.
Analyzes selected code or entire files to identify potential bugs, logic errors, or code quality issues, then generates repair suggestions by prompting the LLM with implicit 'fix' or 'review' instructions. The extension sends the code to the configured model (local Ollama or remote), receives suggested corrections, and presents them as diffs or inline suggestions in the editor. Supports both local and remote models, respecting the user's privacy mode preference.
Unique: Combines bug detection and repair in a single LLM call rather than separating analysis from suggestion generation, reducing latency and allowing the model to reason about fixes in context. Works with any LLM (local or remote) without requiring specialized bug-detection models, making it adaptable to different model capabilities and privacy requirements.
vs alternatives: More flexible than language-specific linters (works across languages), but less precise than static analysis tools; offers privacy advantages over cloud-based code review services while maintaining offline capability.
Enables users to upload documents (PDFs, markdown, text files — exact formats unknown) which are indexed using LlamaIndex and stored in a vector database. When users ask questions in the chat interface, the extension retrieves relevant document excerpts using semantic search and passes them as context to the LLM, enabling question-answering grounded in the uploaded documents. This RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) pattern allows the LLM to answer questions about documentation, specifications, or other reference materials without hallucinating. Available only in Container Mode due to the need for persistent document storage and vector indexing.
Unique: Integrates LlamaIndex-based document indexing directly into the VS Code extension, enabling RAG without requiring separate tools or services. Uses semantic search (vector embeddings) to retrieve relevant document excerpts, grounding LLM responses in uploaded materials rather than relying on training data. Container Mode architecture allows persistent vector storage and caching, enabling efficient re-use of indexed documents across sessions.
vs alternatives: Provides local, privacy-preserving RAG unlike cloud-based documentation assistants, while maintaining offline capability when using local models; however, vector indexing quality and retrieval performance depend on the embedding model used (which is not documented).
Abstracts the underlying LLM provider through a unified interface, allowing users to configure and switch between local Ollama models (Deepseek-R1, etc.) and remote providers (OpenAI, Google Gemini, Cohere, Anthropic, Codestral/Mistral) via settings. The extension routes all inference requests through a provider-agnostic layer that handles authentication, API formatting, and response parsing, enabling users to choose between privacy (local) and capability (remote) without changing workflows. Configuration is managed through VS Code settings (Settings > Extensions > Local AI Pilot > Mode), with support for both Standalone Mode (direct Ollama) and Container Mode (intermediate API service).
Unique: Implements a provider abstraction layer that treats local Ollama and remote APIs as interchangeable backends, enabling users to switch providers without changing extension behavior. Dual-mode architecture (Standalone vs Container) allows different routing strategies: Standalone connects directly to Ollama, while Container Mode routes through an intermediate API service, enabling features like chat history and document indexing that require persistent state.
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-provider tools (Copilot is OpenAI-only), while maintaining offline capability through local Ollama support. However, provider abstraction may limit access to provider-specific advanced features compared to native integrations.
Allows users to explicitly specify file paths (relative or absolute) that should be included as context when generating completions or analyzing code. The extension reads these configured files into memory and injects their contents into prompts sent to the LLM, enabling the model to understand cross-file dependencies, shared types, and architectural patterns without requiring automatic project tree discovery. Configuration is done via extension settings (documented as 'Provide the paths of files to use as additional context'), and context is applied to all inference operations (completion, chat, explanation, repair).
Unique: Implements explicit, user-controlled context injection rather than automatic LSP-based symbol resolution or AST-based dependency detection. This approach trades convenience for control, allowing users to precisely manage context size and relevance without relying on heuristics. Enables reasoning models like Deepseek-R1 to understand project structure through raw code context rather than symbolic information.
vs alternatives: More transparent and controllable than automatic context discovery (like Copilot's codebase indexing), but requires more manual configuration; better for privacy-conscious users who want to see exactly what context is being sent to the LLM.
+3 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs Local AI Pilot - Ollama, Deepseek-R1, and more at 38/100. Local AI Pilot - Ollama, Deepseek-R1, and more leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities