FinQA ranks higher at 60/100 vs distilbert-base-multilingual-cased-sentiments-student at 46/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | distilbert-base-multilingual-cased-sentiments-student | FinQA |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 46/100 | 60/100 |
| Adoption | 1 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 7 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Classifies text sentiment across 9 languages (English, Arabic, German, Spanish, French, Japanese, Chinese, Indonesian, Hindi) using a distilled DistilBERT architecture trained via zero-shot distillation from DeBERTa-v3. The model compresses a larger teacher model into a smaller student variant while preserving multilingual semantic understanding, enabling fast inference on resource-constrained environments without sacrificing cross-lingual accuracy.
Unique: Uses zero-shot distillation from DeBERTa-v3 (a larger, more capable model) to create a lightweight multilingual student model, rather than training from scratch or fine-tuning a base multilingual BERT. This approach preserves cross-lingual semantic alignment while reducing model size by ~40% and inference latency by ~3-4x compared to the teacher.
vs alternatives: Smaller and faster than full DeBERTa-v3 multilingual models while maintaining better cross-lingual transfer than monolingual DistilBERT variants, making it ideal for production systems requiring both speed and multilingual accuracy.
Enables sentiment classification on languages not explicitly seen during training by leveraging multilingual BERT's shared embedding space and the distillation process that preserves semantic alignment across languages. The model transfers learned sentiment patterns from high-resource languages (English, Spanish, French) to low-resource languages (Arabic, Indonesian, Hindi) through shared subword tokenization and aligned contextual representations.
Unique: Achieves zero-shot cross-lingual transfer through distillation from DeBERTa-v3, which has stronger multilingual alignment than standard BERT. The student model inherits this alignment while being compact enough for production, enabling sentiment classification on unseen languages without fine-tuning or additional training data.
vs alternatives: Outperforms monolingual sentiment models on cross-lingual tasks and requires no language-specific retraining, unlike traditional fine-tuned models that need labeled data per language.
Provides optimized inference through knowledge distillation, reducing model parameters and computational requirements while maintaining sentiment classification accuracy. The distilled architecture uses DistilBERT's 6-layer transformer (vs BERT's 12 layers) with shared attention heads, enabling 40% smaller model size and 3-4x faster inference latency compared to the full DeBERTa-v3 teacher model, while supporting ONNX export for further hardware acceleration.
Unique: Combines DistilBERT's architectural compression (6 vs 12 layers, shared attention heads) with knowledge distillation from a stronger DeBERTa-v3 teacher, achieving both size reduction and maintained accuracy. Supports ONNX export for hardware-agnostic optimization, enabling deployment across CPUs, GPUs, and specialized inference accelerators.
vs alternatives: Smaller and faster than full multilingual BERT/DeBERTa models while maintaining better accuracy than lightweight alternatives like TinyBERT, making it ideal for production systems balancing speed, accuracy, and resource constraints.
Processes multiple text samples simultaneously with configurable batch sizes, returning sentiment predictions and optionally attention weight distributions across all transformer layers. The batch processing leverages PyTorch/TensorFlow's vectorized operations to amortize tokenization and model overhead, while attention analysis reveals which tokens contribute most to sentiment decisions, enabling interpretability and debugging of model behavior.
Unique: Combines batch inference with optional attention weight extraction, allowing developers to process large datasets efficiently while maintaining interpretability through attention visualization. The distilled architecture's 6 layers produce more interpretable attention patterns than larger models, with lower computational overhead for attention analysis.
vs alternatives: Faster batch processing than sequential inference while providing built-in attention analysis for interpretability, unlike black-box APIs that return only predictions without explanation.
Loads and exports model weights using the SafeTensors format, a secure, fast serialization standard that prevents arbitrary code execution during deserialization and enables memory-mapped loading for efficient inference. The model is distributed in SafeTensors format alongside PyTorch and ONNX variants, allowing developers to choose the safest and fastest loading mechanism for their deployment environment.
Unique: Provides SafeTensors format support alongside PyTorch and ONNX, enabling secure, fast model loading without arbitrary code execution risk. The distilled model is distributed in all three formats, allowing developers to choose based on security, performance, and compatibility requirements.
vs alternatives: Safer than pickle-based PyTorch .pt format (prevents code execution), faster than ONNX for PyTorch workflows, and more portable than framework-specific formats.
Enables evaluation of AI systems' ability to perform chained mathematical operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, comparisons) across both structured tables and unstructured text extracted from SEC filings. The dataset provides ground-truth question-answer pairs where answers require synthesizing data from multiple locations within earnings reports and applying sequential arithmetic operations, testing whether models can decompose complex financial queries into discrete computational steps.
Unique: Combines real SEC filing documents (not synthetic) with crowdsourced questions requiring multi-step arithmetic, creating a hybrid dataset that tests both domain knowledge extraction and quantitative reasoning in a single evaluation task. Unlike generic math word problems, answers require locating figures within 10+ page documents first.
vs alternatives: More challenging than DROP or SVAMP because it requires financial domain knowledge AND document retrieval before arithmetic, whereas generic math benchmarks assume figures are already extracted
Assesses whether AI systems understand financial terminology, accounting concepts, and domain-specific metrics by requiring them to answer questions about real earnings reports from S&P 500 companies. The dataset tests recognition of financial line items (revenue, COGS, operating expenses, net income), ability to distinguish between different financial statements (income statement vs balance sheet), and understanding of financial ratios and metrics without explicit instruction on their definitions.
Unique: Uses authentic SEC filings rather than synthetic financial data, exposing models to real-world accounting variations, footnote complexity, and the actual structure of professional financial documents. This tests transfer learning from general text to specialized domain without domain-specific pretraining.
vs alternatives: More authentic than synthetic financial QA datasets because it uses real earnings reports with their inherent complexity, but narrower than general financial knowledge benchmarks because it focuses only on historical data interpretation
FinQA scores higher at 60/100 vs distilbert-base-multilingual-cased-sentiments-student at 46/100. distilbert-base-multilingual-cased-sentiments-student leads on adoption and ecosystem, while FinQA is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables evaluation of AI systems' ability to extract numerical data from both structured HTML/text tables and unstructured prose within the same document, then reason over the extracted values. The dataset contains questions where relevant data appears in different formats — some figures are in formatted tables with clear row/column headers, while others are embedded in narrative text or footnotes — requiring robust parsing and entity linking before computation can occur.
Unique: Combines structured table data with unstructured narrative in the same evaluation, forcing systems to handle format heterogeneity and resolve references across different data representations. Most table QA datasets use clean, isolated tables; this tests real-world document complexity.
vs alternatives: More realistic than isolated table QA benchmarks (like SQA or WikiTableQuestions) because it requires handling narrative context and format mixing, but simpler than full document understanding because tables are already in text format (no OCR needed)
Provides a curated, crowdsourced-annotated dataset of 8,281 question-answer pairs with multi-step reasoning requirements, enabling systematic evaluation of AI systems on financial numerical reasoning. The dataset includes quality control mechanisms through crowdworker annotation, answer validation against ground truth, and coverage across diverse financial metrics and company types within the S&P 500, creating a reproducible evaluation standard for the financial AI community.
Unique: Provides a publicly available, reproducible benchmark specifically designed for financial numerical reasoning with real SEC filings, enabling standardized comparison across different financial AI systems. Most financial datasets are proprietary or synthetic; this is open-source and authentic.
vs alternatives: More specialized and challenging than generic QA benchmarks (SQuAD, MRQA) because it requires financial domain knowledge and multi-step arithmetic, but narrower in scope than comprehensive financial understanding benchmarks because it focuses only on numerical reasoning
Assesses AI systems' ability to perform multi-hop reasoning by requiring them to locate and combine information from different sections of earnings reports. Questions may require finding a figure in the income statement, then locating a related metric in the balance sheet, then performing arithmetic across both — testing whether models can maintain context across document boundaries and understand relationships between different financial statement sections.
Unique: Embeds multi-hop reasoning requirements within authentic financial documents where hops correspond to real relationships between financial statement sections, rather than synthetic reasoning chains. This tests whether models understand domain structure, not just generic multi-hop patterns.
vs alternatives: More realistic than synthetic multi-hop datasets (HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA) because reasoning hops follow actual financial relationships, but less controlled because document structure varies and reasoning paths are implicit rather than explicitly annotated
Enables evaluation of whether AI systems can identify which arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, comparison) are required to answer financial questions, then execute them correctly. The dataset implicitly tests operation selection — a question asking 'what is the profit margin' requires division (net income / revenue), while 'what is total assets' requires addition — forcing models to understand financial semantics before applying math.
Unique: Embeds arithmetic operation selection within financial domain context, requiring models to understand that 'margin' semantically maps to division and 'total' maps to addition. This tests semantic grounding of operations, not just arithmetic execution.
vs alternatives: More semantically grounded than generic math word problem datasets because operation selection is implicit in financial terminology, but less explicit than datasets with annotated operation types because operations must be inferred
Provides evaluation capability for AI systems to compare financial metrics across multiple S&P 500 companies or aggregate metrics across different time periods within the same company's earnings reports. While individual questions reference single documents, the dataset structure enables evaluation of systems that can retrieve and compare relevant companies, requiring understanding of which metrics are comparable across entities and how to normalize for company size or accounting differences.
Unique: Provides a foundation for evaluating cross-company financial comparison by including diverse S&P 500 companies with different business models and scales, enabling assessment of whether systems can normalize and compare metrics appropriately. Most financial QA datasets focus on single-document questions.
vs alternatives: Enables cross-company evaluation unlike single-document QA datasets, but requires external retrieval and comparison logic because the dataset itself contains only single-document questions