| 1 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Decomposes large language models (70B+ parameters) into individual transformer layers that are loaded into GPU memory only when needed during forward passes, then unloaded after computation completes. Uses a layer-by-layer execution strategy where each layer is fetched from disk storage, processed with its input activations, and immediately freed, reducing peak memory footprint from full model size to single-layer size. This architectural approach enables 70B models to run on 4GB VRAM without quantization or distillation.
Unique: Implements layer-by-layer on-demand loading with automatic layer decomposition during first run, storing each transformer layer as a separate disk artifact that is fetched and released during inference — differs from traditional quantization by preserving full precision weights while trading compute latency for memory efficiency
vs alternatives: Maintains full model accuracy without quantization overhead, whereas vLLM/TensorRT require larger VRAM or accept accuracy loss through quantization; enables 70B inference on 4GB where alternatives require 24GB+
Overlaps disk I/O operations with GPU computation by prefetching the next transformer layer while the current layer is being processed. Uses a background I/O thread that predicts which layer will be needed next and loads it into a staging buffer during the current layer's forward pass, reducing idle GPU time. Achieves approximately 10% inference speed improvement by hiding disk latency behind computation.
Unique: Implements background I/O thread that speculatively loads next layer during current layer computation, using a simple sequential prediction model rather than ML-based prefetching heuristics — trades prediction accuracy for implementation simplicity
vs alternatives: Simpler than vLLM's KV-cache prefetching but specifically optimized for layer-sharded architectures; provides measurable latency reduction without requiring model-specific tuning
Provides utilities to introspect transformer model architectures and automatically extract layer definitions from model configs. Uses config.json inspection to identify layer count, hidden dimensions, attention heads, and other architectural parameters. Supports dynamic layer extraction for models with non-standard layer structures. Enables programmatic access to layer boundaries and architectural metadata.
Unique: Implements config-based layer extraction with support for multiple transformer variants, enabling automatic layer sharding without manual architecture specification — differs from static layer definitions by supporting dynamic extraction
vs alternatives: Enables automatic support for new model architectures without code changes; more flexible than hardcoded layer definitions; simpler than AST-based introspection
Applies optional block-wise quantization to model weights only (not activations) to reduce model disk footprint and loading time, offering 4-bit or 8-bit quantization modes. Unlike traditional quantization that quantizes both weights and activations, this approach preserves activation precision during inference, maintaining model accuracy while achieving up to 3x inference speed improvement through reduced I/O overhead. Quantization is applied during model decomposition and stored per-layer on disk.
Unique: Quantizes weights only while preserving activation precision, differing from standard quantization (QAT/PTQ) that quantizes both weights and activations — maintains better accuracy by avoiding activation quantization noise while still reducing I/O overhead
vs alternatives: Achieves 3x speed improvement with minimal accuracy loss, whereas GPTQ/AWQ require more complex calibration; simpler than mixed-precision quantization but less flexible than per-layer bit-width selection
Provides a unified AutoModel interface that automatically detects model architecture (Llama, ChatGLM, QWen, Baichuan, Mistral, Mixtral, InternLM) from model config and instantiates the appropriate implementation. Includes platform-specific optimizations: uses MLX framework on macOS for native Apple Silicon acceleration, CUDA on NVIDIA GPUs, and ROCm on AMD GPUs. Abstracts away platform differences through a single Python API.
Unique: Implements architecture detection via config inspection with platform-specific backend selection (MLX for macOS, CUDA/ROCm for GPU) in a single AutoModel class — differs from HuggingFace AutoModel by adding layer-sharding-specific optimizations and platform detection logic
vs alternatives: Simpler than manual architecture selection; provides native MLX support on macOS where HuggingFace transformers requires ONNX conversion; unified API across Llama/ChatGLM/QWen/Baichuan/Mistral/Mixtral/InternLM
Decomposes full models into individual transformer layers during first run and persists each layer as a separate disk artifact in a structured directory hierarchy. Uses PyTorch's state_dict serialization to save layer weights, biases, and normalization parameters independently. Subsequent runs load layers on-demand from disk without redecomposition. Supports both full-precision and quantized layer storage with metadata tracking.
Unique: Implements one-time decomposition strategy that converts full models to layer-sharded format with per-layer disk persistence, using PyTorch state_dict serialization — differs from runtime layer extraction by pre-computing and caching layer boundaries
vs alternatives: Eliminates repeated decomposition overhead; enables fast layer loading on subsequent runs; simpler than dynamic layer extraction but requires upfront storage investment
Provides architecture-specific implementations for 8+ transformer variants (Llama, ChatGLM, QWen, Baichuan, Mistral, Mixtral, InternLM) while exposing a unified inference interface. Each architecture has custom layer definitions that respect model-specific attention mechanisms, activation functions, and normalization schemes. Unified interface handles tokenization, prompt formatting, and output parsing consistently across all supported models.
Unique: Implements architecture-specific layer classes (LlamaDecoderLayer, ChatGLMBlock, etc.) with unified inference interface that abstracts architectural differences — enables single codebase to handle 8+ model families without conditional logic
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-architecture frameworks; simpler than vLLM's architecture registry by using Python inheritance rather than plugin system; supports emerging models faster than HuggingFace transformers
Provides explicit support for models with extended context windows (e.g., 32K, 100K token contexts) through optimized attention computation and memory management. Handles long sequences by managing KV-cache memory more efficiently during layer-wise inference, avoiding full KV-cache materialization. Supports position interpolation and other long-context techniques at the layer level.
Unique: Optimizes KV-cache management at the layer level for long sequences, avoiding full materialization while maintaining layer-sharding benefits — differs from standard long-context support by integrating with layer-wise loading strategy
vs alternatives: Enables long-context inference on 4GB VRAM where standard implementations require 24GB+; simpler than sparse attention but less flexible; integrates naturally with layer-sharding architecture
+3 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs airllm at 36/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities