| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Extracts and deduplicates raw text content from Common Crawl's petabyte-scale web archive across 101 languages using language identification models to segment documents by language. The pipeline applies probabilistic language detection (likely fastText or similar) to raw HTML/text, filters by confidence thresholds, and stores language-segmented output in Parquet format for efficient columnar access. This enables training data curation at web scale without requiring manual annotation.
Unique: Processes Common Crawl at petabyte scale with language-aware segmentation across 101 languages, providing pre-filtered language-specific subsets rather than requiring downstream filtering. Uses probabilistic language ID to avoid expensive manual annotation while maintaining reasonable precision for high-resource languages.
vs alternatives: Larger and more multilingual than OSCAR (85 languages) and more web-representative than Wikipedia-derived corpora, but with lower quality control than curated datasets like GLUE or SuperGLUE
Provides pre-computed language-segmented subsets of the full mC4 corpus, allowing users to load data for specific languages or language groups without downloading the entire 750GB+ dataset. The Hugging Face Datasets API enables filtering by language code at load time, with lazy evaluation and streaming support to handle memory constraints. Internally uses Parquet partitioning by language to enable efficient columnar access to language-specific splits.
Unique: Provides language-partitioned Parquet files enabling efficient columnar filtering without full corpus download. Supports both batch download and streaming APIs, allowing researchers to work with language subsets at different scales (100MB to 300GB) without infrastructure overhead.
vs alternatives: More flexible language selection than OSCAR (which requires manual filtering) and more scalable than downloading Wikipedia dumps per language, with built-in streaming for memory-constrained environments
Applies heuristic-based quality filtering to remove low-quality web text (boilerplate, navigation menus, spam) and deduplicates near-identical documents using MinHash or similar probabilistic deduplication. The pipeline likely uses line-level or document-level heuristics (e.g., minimum text length, ratio of punctuation to words, presence of common boilerplate patterns) combined with fuzzy matching to identify and remove duplicates. This reduces noise in the training corpus while maintaining linguistic diversity.
Unique: Applies language-agnostic heuristic filtering (line length, punctuation ratios, common boilerplate patterns) combined with probabilistic deduplication across 101 languages simultaneously, rather than language-specific rules. Deduplication operates at scale using MinHash to handle petabyte-scale data efficiently.
vs alternatives: More aggressive deduplication than OSCAR (which uses simpler exact matching) and more scalable than manual curation, but less precise than learned quality classifiers (which require labeled data)
Integrates with specific Common Crawl snapshots (e.g., CC-MAIN-2019-09, CC-MAIN-2021-04) to provide reproducible, versioned training data. The dataset is built from publicly documented Common Crawl releases, allowing users to trace the exact web crawl dates and sources. Hugging Face Datasets versioning enables reproducible downloads of specific mC4 versions, ensuring that model training is repeatable and auditable.
Unique: Provides explicit versioning tied to Common Crawl snapshots with full provenance metadata, enabling researchers to cite exact data sources and reproduce training runs. Integrates with Hugging Face Datasets versioning system for reproducible downloads across time.
vs alternatives: More transparent data provenance than OSCAR (which obscures Common Crawl snapshot dates) and more reproducible than continuously-updated web corpora like C4, which change over time
Enables streaming access to mC4 without downloading the full corpus, using Hugging Face Datasets' streaming API to fetch data on-demand from remote Parquet files. The implementation uses HTTP range requests to read only the required rows/columns from Parquet files, avoiding local storage overhead. This allows researchers with limited disk space to train models on subsets or iterate quickly without waiting for multi-hour downloads.
Unique: Implements HTTP range-request-based streaming for Parquet files, enabling on-demand access to specific rows/columns without full download. Integrates with Hugging Face Datasets IterableDataset API for seamless integration with PyTorch DataLoader and Hugging Face Transformers training loops.
vs alternatives: More memory-efficient than downloading full mC4 and more flexible than pre-computed train/test splits, enabling dynamic subset selection and rapid prototyping
Applies automatic language identification to raw Common Crawl text to segment documents by language, assigning each document an ISO 639-1 language code with confidence scores. The pipeline likely uses a fast, multilingual language detector (e.g., fastText, langdetect, or a custom model) to classify text at the document or paragraph level. Language assignments are stored as metadata, enabling downstream filtering and language-specific analysis without re-running detection.
Unique: Applies language identification at petabyte scale across 101 languages simultaneously, storing language assignments as queryable metadata. Enables efficient language-specific filtering without re-running detection, and provides confidence scores for downstream quality assessment.
vs alternatives: Covers more languages (101) than most language identification systems (typically 50-80) and provides pre-computed assignments for all documents, avoiding per-user detection overhead
Integrates mC4 with Hugging Face Datasets library, providing a Pythonic API for loading, filtering, and iterating over the corpus. Users can load data using `datasets.load_dataset('mc4', 'en')` syntax, with support for filtering, mapping, and batching operations. The integration enables seamless integration with PyTorch DataLoader, Hugging Face Transformers training pipelines, and other standard ML tools without custom data loading code.
Unique: Provides native Hugging Face Datasets integration with standard load_dataset() API, enabling one-line access to 101 language subsets. Supports both batch and streaming modes, with automatic caching and version management through Hugging Face Hub.
vs alternatives: More convenient than raw Common Crawl access (which requires manual WARC parsing) and more integrated with Hugging Face Transformers ecosystem than generic data loading libraries
Provides a standardized evaluation framework for code generation models that accepts generated code in 17 programming languages (C, C++, C#, Java, Kotlin, Go, Rust, Python, Ruby, PHP, JavaScript, Perl, Haskell, OCaml, Scala, D, Pascal) and validates correctness through actual execution against unit tests via the ExecEval Docker-based execution engine. Uses a centralized problem definition model with src_uid foreign keys linking generated code to shared problem descriptions and unittest_db.json, enabling consistent evaluation across language variants of the same problem.
Unique: Combines 25M training examples across 7,500 unique problems with an execution-based evaluation pipeline (ExecEval) that actually runs generated code in Docker containers against unit tests, rather than relying on static analysis or string matching. The src_uid linking system creates a normalized data model where problem descriptions and tests are stored once and referenced by all language variants, eliminating duplication and ensuring consistency.
vs alternatives: Larger scale (25M examples vs typical 10-100K) and true execution-based validation across more languages (17 vs 4-6) than HumanEval or CodeXGLUE, with explicit support for code translation and repair tasks beyond generation.
Implements a foreign key linking system where all task-specific datasets (program synthesis, code translation, APR, retrieval) reference shared problem definitions via src_uid identifiers. Problem descriptions and unit tests are stored once in centralized problem_descriptions.jsonl and unittest_db.json files, then linked by src_uid to avoid duplication. The Hugging Face datasets API automatically resolves these links during data loading, returning enriched DatasetDict objects with problem context pre-joined to task examples.
Unique: Uses a normalized relational data model (src_uid as foreign key) for a code benchmark, treating problem definitions as a separate entity layer rather than embedding them in each task dataset. This is more sophisticated than typical flat-file benchmark structures and enables consistent multi-task evaluation on identical problems.
xCodeEval scores higher at 67/100 vs mC4 at 60/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More efficient than duplicating problem descriptions across 7 task datasets (reduces storage by ~30-40%), and enables automatic link resolution via Hugging Face API unlike manual CSV joins in CodeXGLUE or HumanEval variants.
Provides a Python API for loading xCodeEval datasets from Hugging Face Hub (NTU-NLP-sg/xCodeEval) with automatic src_uid-based linking between task datasets and shared problem definitions. The datasets library handles data downloading, caching, and streaming, while the xCodeEval integration automatically joins task examples with problem_descriptions.jsonl and unittest_db.json using src_uid foreign keys. Returns DatasetDict objects with enriched examples ready for model training or evaluation.
Unique: Integrates xCodeEval with Hugging Face datasets library, providing automatic src_uid resolution and streaming support. Treats data loading as a first-class concern with built-in linking logic, rather than requiring manual JSON parsing.
vs alternatives: More convenient than manual Git LFS downloads because it handles caching and automatic linking, and integrates seamlessly with Hugging Face training pipelines vs custom data loaders.
Provides an alternative data access method using Git LFS for users who prefer direct file access or need selective dataset downloads. Supports cloning the repository with LFS disabled, then pulling specific task files or problem definitions on demand. Useful for custom processing pipelines or environments where Python/Hugging Face is not available, though requires manual src_uid linking to join task examples with problem definitions.
Unique: Provides Git LFS-based alternative to Hugging Face API, enabling direct file access and selective downloads. Requires manual src_uid linking but offers more control over data access patterns.
vs alternatives: More flexible than Hugging Face API for selective downloads and custom pipelines, but requires more manual work for src_uid linking and lacks automatic caching/streaming.
Implements a standardized three-phase evaluation pipeline (Phase 1: Generation, Phase 2: Execution, Phase 3: Metrics) that applies consistently across all 7 tasks (program synthesis, code translation, APR, tag classification, code compilation, NL-code retrieval, code-code retrieval). Phase 1 generates or retrieves code, Phase 2 executes it via ExecEval or computes retrieval metrics, and Phase 3 aggregates results into pass@k, MRR, NDCG, or other task-specific metrics. Enables direct comparison of model performance across tasks.
Unique: Defines a unified three-phase evaluation pipeline that applies to all 7 tasks, treating generation, execution, and metric computation as separate concerns. Enables consistent evaluation methodology across diverse task types (generation, translation, retrieval, classification).
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than task-specific evaluation scripts because it provides a unified framework for all 7 tasks, and enables direct comparison of model performance across different task types.
Evaluates code generation models on the program synthesis task by accepting natural language problem descriptions and generating code solutions in any of 17 languages. The evaluation pipeline (Phase 1: Generation, Phase 2: Execution, Phase 3: Metrics) runs generated code against unit tests via ExecEval, computing pass@k metrics (pass@1, pass@10, etc.) that measure the probability of finding a correct solution within k samples. Supports both single-solution and multi-sample evaluation modes for assessing model reliability.
Unique: Implements a three-phase evaluation pipeline (Generation → Execution → Metrics) with explicit pass@k computation that measures the probability of finding a correct solution within k attempts, rather than just binary pass/fail. Supports multi-sample evaluation across 17 languages with language-specific compiler configurations and timeout handling.
vs alternatives: More rigorous than HumanEval's simple pass@k because it handles language-specific compilation errors and timeouts explicitly, and scales to 25M training examples vs HumanEval's 164 problems.
Evaluates code translation models by accepting source code in one language and generated translations in a target language, then validating functional equivalence through execution against shared unit tests. The translation evaluation pipeline compiles and executes both source and translated code against the same unittest_db.json test cases, comparing outputs to detect translation errors. Supports all 17 language pairs (though not all pairs may have training data) and uses language-specific compiler mappings to handle syntax differences.
Unique: Validates code translation by executing both source and target code against identical unit tests and comparing outputs, ensuring functional equivalence rather than syntactic similarity. Uses language-specific compiler mappings to handle the complexity of 17 different compilation environments and their idiosyncrasies.
vs alternatives: More rigorous than BLEU-score-based translation metrics because it validates actual functional correctness through execution, and covers more language pairs (17 vs typical 2-4) with explicit compiler integration.
Evaluates program repair models by providing buggy code snippets and expecting corrected versions that pass unit tests. The APR evaluation pipeline executes repaired code against unittest_db.json test cases, measuring whether the repair successfully fixes the bug without introducing new failures. Supports repairs across all 17 languages and uses the same execution-based validation as program synthesis, enabling direct comparison of repair quality.
Unique: Treats program repair as an executable task where success is measured by unit test passage, rather than syntactic similarity to reference repairs. Integrates with the same ExecEval pipeline as program synthesis, enabling direct performance comparison between generation and repair models.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than traditional APR benchmarks (Defects4J, QuixBugs) because it covers 17 languages and 7,500 problems vs 395 Java bugs, and uses consistent execution-based metrics across all repair types.
+5 more capabilities