| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
MCP-Bridge exposes FastAPI endpoints that implement the OpenAI chat completions API specification, intercepting incoming requests and dynamically injecting available MCP tool definitions into the request payload before forwarding to downstream LLM inference servers. This allows any OpenAI-compatible client (Claude Desktop, LM Studio, Ollama, etc.) to transparently access MCP tools without modification. The middleware performs request transformation at the HTTP layer, mapping between OpenAI tool schemas and MCP tool schemas bidirectionally.
Unique: Implements transparent request/response transformation at the HTTP middleware layer using FastAPI, allowing unmodified OpenAI clients to access MCP tools by injecting tool schemas into the request before forwarding to inference servers, then extracting and routing tool calls back to MCP servers — no client-side changes required.
vs alternatives: Unlike direct MCP client libraries that require application code changes, MCP-Bridge works with any existing OpenAI API client as a drop-in proxy, making it faster to integrate into legacy systems than rewriting client implementations.
MCP-Bridge maintains a configurable pool of connections to multiple MCP servers, handling lifecycle management (connection establishment, health checks, reconnection on failure) through an MCP Client Manager component. The system discovers available tools from each connected MCP server, aggregates their tool definitions, and maintains a unified tool registry. Connection configuration is typically specified via environment variables or configuration files, allowing runtime addition/removal of MCP servers without code changes.
Unique: Implements a centralized MCP Client Manager that maintains persistent connections to multiple MCP servers, aggregates their tool definitions into a unified registry, and handles connection lifecycle (reconnection, health checks) transparently — enabling a single bridge instance to serve tools from many MCP sources.
vs alternatives: Compared to applications that connect directly to individual MCP servers, MCP-Bridge's multi-server aggregation allows a single proxy to unify tools from many sources, reducing client complexity and enabling centralized access control.
MCP-Bridge includes a structured release process with version tagging and release notes. The project uses semantic versioning and maintains a changelog documenting changes across releases. Release artifacts are published to package registries (PyPI, GitHub Releases, etc.), allowing users to install specific versions. The release process is automated via CI/CD pipelines that build, test, and publish releases.
Unique: Implements semantic versioning and automated release process with published artifacts to package registries, enabling users to install and manage specific versions of MCP-Bridge with clear changelog documentation.
vs alternatives: Compared to projects without formal release processes, MCP-Bridge's versioning and changelog provide clarity on changes and enable stable, reproducible deployments.
MCP-Bridge implements a tool mapping layer that converts MCP tool definitions (with MCP-specific schema format) into OpenAI function-calling schema format for injection into requests, and conversely translates OpenAI tool_call objects back into MCP-compatible tool invocation requests. This translation handles differences in schema representation, parameter validation rules, and response formatting between the two protocols, ensuring semantic equivalence despite format differences.
Unique: Implements bidirectional schema translation at the tool definition level, converting between MCP and OpenAI formats while preserving semantic meaning — allowing tools defined in MCP format to be transparently used by OpenAI API clients without requiring tool authors to maintain dual definitions.
vs alternatives: Unlike solutions that require tools to be defined separately for each protocol, MCP-Bridge's translation layer allows a single MCP tool definition to be used with OpenAI clients, reducing maintenance burden and ensuring consistency.
When an LLM generates tool_call objects in response to a chat completion request, MCP-Bridge intercepts these calls, identifies which MCP server should handle each tool, routes the invocation to the appropriate server, and collects results. The system maintains a mapping of tool names to their source MCP servers, enabling correct dispatch even when multiple servers provide tools with similar names. Tool execution is synchronous with request processing, and results are formatted back into OpenAI API response format.
Unique: Implements a tool dispatch layer that maps tool_call objects to their source MCP servers and executes them synchronously within the request/response cycle, enabling agentic workflows where LLM tool calls are immediately executed and results fed back for further reasoning.
vs alternatives: Unlike client-side tool execution where applications must implement their own routing logic, MCP-Bridge's centralized dispatch ensures consistent tool execution semantics and error handling across all clients.
MCP-Bridge supports both streaming and non-streaming chat completion responses. For streaming requests, it implements a Server-Sent Events (SSE) interface that forwards LLM token streams to clients while managing tool calls that may occur mid-stream. The system buffers tool calls, executes them when complete, and injects results back into the stream context. This enables real-time token delivery while maintaining tool-calling semantics.
Unique: Implements a streaming response handler that manages both token streaming and mid-stream tool calls, buffering tool invocations until complete, executing them, and injecting results back into the token stream — enabling real-time streaming while maintaining tool-calling semantics.
vs alternatives: Unlike simple streaming proxies that cannot handle tool calls, MCP-Bridge's SSE bridge manages the complexity of tool execution during streaming, allowing clients to receive real-time tokens while tools are being executed in the background.
MCP-Bridge includes an authentication middleware layer (implemented in auth.py) that validates API keys on incoming requests before processing. The system supports optional API key authentication — when enabled, all requests must include a valid API key in the Authorization header. Authentication is configurable via environment variables, allowing operators to enable/disable it without code changes. The middleware intercepts requests early in the FastAPI pipeline, rejecting unauthorized requests before they reach downstream processing.
Unique: Implements optional API key-based authentication as a FastAPI middleware layer that validates requests early in the pipeline, allowing operators to enable/disable authentication via environment variables without code changes — providing basic access control for deployments.
vs alternatives: While simpler than OAuth2 or JWT-based approaches, MCP-Bridge's API key authentication is sufficient for basic access control and can be deployed quickly without external authentication services.
MCP-Bridge includes a model sampling system that allows clients to specify which inference server or model to use for chat completions. The system forwards the model parameter from client requests to the downstream inference server, enabling selection between multiple models or inference backends. This allows a single bridge instance to route requests to different inference servers based on client preference, supporting scenarios where different models have different capabilities or performance characteristics.
Unique: Implements model sampling as a pass-through parameter that allows clients to specify which inference server or model to use, enabling a single bridge instance to route requests to different backends based on client preference without requiring bridge-level model management.
vs alternatives: Unlike load balancers that distribute requests blindly, MCP-Bridge's model sampling gives clients explicit control over which inference backend processes their request, enabling use cases like model selection and A/B testing.
+3 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs MCP-Bridge at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities