| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 15 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Searches across 1,396 n8n nodes (812 core + 584 community) using a pre-built SQLite database indexed at build time from npm packages. The system extracts node metadata, parameters, and descriptions during build phase via src/scripts/rebuild.ts, then serves fast read-only queries at runtime without network latency. Supports fuzzy matching and parameter-level documentation retrieval to help AI assistants understand node capabilities and configuration options.
Unique: Uses a pre-indexed SQLite database built at compile time from n8n npm packages, eliminating runtime network calls and enabling instant documentation queries. The dual-phase architecture (build-time indexing + runtime read-only queries) is distinct from cloud-based documentation APIs that require real-time network access.
vs alternatives: Faster than querying n8n's live API or web documentation because all 1,396 nodes are pre-indexed locally in SQLite, with zero network latency per search.
Translates natural language workflow descriptions into valid n8n workflow JSON by combining node documentation search, parameter validation, and expression generation. The MCP server exposes tools that allow Claude/Cursor to iteratively build workflow objects by selecting nodes, configuring parameters with type checking, and connecting node outputs to inputs. Uses a validation framework (src/services/workflow-validator.ts) to ensure generated workflows conform to n8n's schema before returning.
Unique: Combines semantic node search with multi-layer validation (src/services/workflow-validator.ts) to generate not just syntactically valid but semantically correct n8n workflows. The auto-fix system (mentioned in DeepWiki) can remediate common configuration errors automatically, reducing iteration cycles.
vs alternatives: More accurate than generic code generation because it validates against n8n's actual node schemas and parameter types, not just generic JSON structure.
Detects n8n version compatibility for nodes and workflows, warning when workflows use nodes unavailable in the target n8n version. The version detection system (mentioned in DeepWiki) tracks node availability across n8n versions and validates that generated workflows are compatible with the user's n8n instance. Prevents deployment failures due to version mismatches.
Unique: Tracks node availability across n8n versions in the SQLite database, enabling version-aware workflow generation and validation. Prevents deployment failures by detecting incompatibilities before workflows are deployed.
vs alternatives: More proactive than n8n's built-in version checking because it validates compatibility at workflow generation time, not deployment time.
Supports multi-tenant deployments where multiple users/organizations share a single n8n-mcp instance with isolated credentials and workflows. The multi-tenant configuration (mentioned in DeepWiki) uses environment variables and session management to isolate n8n API credentials and workflow data per tenant. Enables SaaS platforms to offer n8n workflow generation as a managed service.
Unique: Implements multi-tenant isolation at the session and API credential level, allowing a single n8n-mcp instance to serve multiple organizations with separate n8n backends. The configuration system uses environment variables to manage per-tenant credentials.
vs alternatives: Enables SaaS deployment models that single-tenant MCP servers cannot support, with per-tenant API credential routing and session isolation.
Collects telemetry data on workflow generation and execution, enabling analysis of AI-generated workflow quality and performance. The telemetry system (mentioned in DeepWiki) tracks metrics like generation time, validation errors, execution success rates, and node usage patterns. Provides insights for optimizing workflow generation and identifying common failure modes.
Unique: Provides n8n-specific telemetry that tracks workflow generation quality and execution performance, enabling data-driven optimization of the generation system. Integrates with n8n's execution logs for end-to-end visibility.
vs alternatives: More actionable than generic telemetry because it tracks workflow-specific metrics (node usage, validation errors, execution success) relevant to workflow generation quality.
Suggests parameter values based on workflow context, node type, and previous node outputs. The smart parameters system (mentioned in DeepWiki) analyzes the workflow graph to understand data flow and suggests appropriate values for downstream nodes. For example, if a previous node outputs user data, the system suggests mapping that data to email node parameters. Reduces manual configuration and improves workflow correctness.
Unique: Uses workflow graph analysis to suggest parameters based on data flow from previous nodes, not just generic suggestions. Understands n8n's data mapping semantics (expressions, field references) to provide contextually relevant suggestions.
vs alternatives: More accurate than generic parameter suggestions because it analyzes the workflow graph and understands data flow between nodes.
Recommends similar nodes and templates based on semantic similarity of descriptions and use cases. The similarity service (mentioned in DeepWiki) uses text embeddings or keyword matching to find nodes/templates related to the user's query. Helps users discover alternatives and related integrations they might not find through direct search.
Unique: Provides semantic similarity-based recommendations across 1,396 nodes and 2,709 templates, enabling discovery of related integrations. Uses pre-indexed metadata to compute recommendations without external API calls.
vs alternatives: More discoverable than direct search because it surfaces related nodes/templates the user might not think to search for explicitly.
Searches a pre-indexed library of 2,709 n8n templates and adapts them to user requirements by modifying node parameters and connections. The template system (src/mcp/tool-docs/workflow_management/template-tools.ts) retrieves template metadata from SQLite, then uses the validation framework to ensure modifications maintain workflow integrity. Enables users to start from working examples rather than building from scratch.
Unique: Indexes 2,709 templates in SQLite at build time, enabling instant template discovery without API calls. The adaptation system validates modifications against the n8n schema, ensuring customized templates remain executable.
vs alternatives: Faster template discovery than browsing n8n's web marketplace because all 2,709 templates are pre-indexed and searchable locally via MCP.
+7 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs n8n-mcp at 35/100. n8n-mcp leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities