memento-mcp vs Power Query
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | memento-mcp | Power Query |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | Product |
| UnfragileRank | 32/100 | 35/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 14 decomposed | 18 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Constructs and maintains a Neo4j-backed knowledge graph where entities (persons, organizations, concepts) serve as primary nodes with complete version history and temporal audit trails. Each entity stores name, type classification, observational statements, and vector embeddings. The system automatically tracks all mutations through Neo4jStorageProvider, enabling point-in-time reconstruction of entity state at any historical timestamp and supporting confidence decay calculations over time.
Unique: Implements complete temporal versioning at the entity level with automatic confidence decay calculations, rather than treating the knowledge graph as a static snapshot. Uses Neo4j's native graph structure combined with timestamp-aware queries to enable point-in-time reconstruction without separate time-series databases.
vs alternatives: Provides temporal awareness and confidence decay that vector-only memory systems (like simple RAG) lack, while maintaining graph structure advantages over flat document stores for relationship reasoning.
Manages directed relationships between entities with multi-dimensional scoring: strength (0.0-1.0 importance indicator) and confidence (0.0-1.0 certainty level). Relationships are stored as Neo4j edges with relationType classification, metadata fields, and automatic timestamp tracking. The system supports relationship creation, updates, and queries that filter by strength/confidence thresholds, enabling LLMs to reason about relationship reliability and importance.
Unique: Decouples strength (importance) from confidence (certainty) as independent dimensions, allowing LLMs to distinguish between 'this relationship is important but uncertain' vs. 'this relationship is unimportant but certain'. Implements automatic confidence decay over time using configurable half-life parameters.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than simple triple stores that treat all relationships equally; enables probabilistic reasoning about relationship reliability without requiring external Bayesian inference systems.
Abstracts Neo4j database operations through a Neo4jStorageProvider interface, enabling potential future storage backend swaps without changing business logic. The provider handles all graph mutations, queries, vector indexing, and temporal operations. This layered architecture separates storage concerns from knowledge graph management, improving testability and maintainability. The provider implements connection pooling, transaction management, and error handling for Neo4j operations.
Unique: Implements storage abstraction through a provider interface pattern, decoupling business logic from Neo4j-specific implementation details. Enables testability through mock providers and future backend flexibility without rewriting core graph operations.
vs alternatives: More maintainable than tightly coupled Neo4j code; enables unit testing of business logic without database dependencies through mock providers.
Stores arbitrary metadata as key-value pairs on relationships, enabling custom fields beyond standard properties (strength, confidence, relationType). Metadata is unstructured and flexible, allowing LLMs to attach domain-specific information to relationships without schema changes. Metadata is queryable and included in relationship results, supporting rich relationship semantics.
Unique: Treats relationship metadata as first-class queryable properties rather than opaque blobs, enabling flexible relationship semantics without schema changes. Metadata is included in all relationship queries and results.
vs alternatives: More flexible than fixed-schema relationship properties; enables domain-specific customization without requiring schema migrations.
Provides a command-line interface for managing knowledge graphs locally without requiring MCP client integration. The CLI enables entity creation, relationship management, search, and temporal queries through terminal commands, supporting scripted workflows and local testing. The CLI uses the same underlying KnowledgeGraphManager as the MCP server, ensuring consistent behavior across interfaces.
Unique: Provides CLI interface that shares the same KnowledgeGraphManager implementation as the MCP server, ensuring consistent behavior across local and remote access patterns. Enables scripted workflows and testing without MCP client overhead.
vs alternatives: More convenient than direct Neo4j Cypher queries for common operations; enables local development without MCP server setup.
Manages system configuration through environment variables and optional config files, enabling deployment flexibility without code changes. Configuration includes Neo4j connection details, OpenAI API keys, embedding batch sizes, decay half-life parameters, and MCP server settings. The system loads configuration at startup with environment variable precedence over file-based config, supporting both development and production deployments.
Unique: Implements configuration management with environment variable precedence, enabling secure credential handling and environment-specific tuning without code changes. Supports both file-based and environment variable configuration.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded configuration; enables production deployments with proper credential separation.
Generates and caches vector embeddings for entities using OpenAI's text-embedding-3-small model through an EmbeddingJobManager that batches requests and implements exponential backoff retry logic. Embeddings are cached in Neo4j's vector index to enable semantic similarity search. The system queues embedding jobs asynchronously, allowing entity creation to proceed without blocking on embedding generation, while maintaining eventual consistency through background job processing.
Unique: Implements asynchronous embedding generation via EmbeddingJobManager with exponential backoff retry logic and in-database caching, decoupling embedding latency from entity creation. Uses Neo4j's native vector index rather than external vector databases, reducing operational complexity.
vs alternatives: Faster than synchronous embedding approaches for bulk entity creation; more cost-efficient than naive per-entity API calls through batching; simpler than external vector DB solutions by leveraging Neo4j's built-in vector capabilities.
Implements hybrid search combining vector similarity (via Neo4j vector index) and keyword matching, with an adaptive strategy selector that automatically chooses the optimal search method based on query characteristics. Semantic search uses entity embeddings to find conceptually similar entities; keyword search uses Neo4j full-text indexes for exact term matching. The system evaluates query properties (length, specificity, entity type) to route to the most effective search path.
Unique: Implements adaptive strategy selection that automatically routes queries to semantic or keyword search based on query characteristics, rather than requiring explicit user configuration. Combines Neo4j's vector index and full-text index capabilities in a single unified search interface.
vs alternatives: More intelligent than single-strategy search systems; avoids the latency overhead of always running both semantic and keyword searches by adaptively selecting the optimal path.
+6 more capabilities
Construct data transformations through a visual, step-by-step interface without writing code. Users click through operations like filtering, sorting, and reshaping data, with each step automatically generating M language code in the background.
Automatically detect and assign appropriate data types (text, number, date, boolean) to columns based on content analysis. Reduces manual type-setting and catches data quality issues early.
Stack multiple datasets vertically to combine rows from different sources. Automatically aligns columns by name and handles mismatched schemas.
Split a single column into multiple columns based on delimiters, fixed widths, or patterns. Extracts structured data from unstructured text fields.
Convert data between wide and long formats. Pivot transforms rows into columns (aggregating values), while unpivot transforms columns into rows.
Identify and remove duplicate rows based on all columns or specific key columns. Keeps first or last occurrence based on user preference.
Detect, replace, and manage null or missing values in datasets. Options include removing rows, filling with defaults, or using formulas to impute values.
Power Query scores higher at 35/100 vs memento-mcp at 32/100. memento-mcp leads on adoption and ecosystem, while Power Query is stronger on quality. However, memento-mcp offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Apply text operations like case conversion (upper, lower, proper), trimming whitespace, and text replacement. Standardizes text data for consistent analysis.
+10 more capabilities