| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Manages the startup, shutdown, and request routing of multiple MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers through a centralized control plane. Acts as a local proxy that intercepts client requests (from Claude, Cursor, VSCode, etc.) and routes them to appropriate MCP server instances, handling connection pooling and server state tracking without exposing individual server endpoints to clients.
Unique: Provides a desktop GUI control plane specifically for MCP server orchestration rather than requiring manual CLI management or custom proxy code; integrates with multiple AI clients (Claude, Cursor, VSCode, Windsurf, Cline) through a unified routing interface
vs alternatives: Eliminates the need to manually configure MCP connections in each client by providing a centralized router that all clients can connect to, reducing configuration duplication and management overhead
Handles authentication flows for MCP servers and integrated applications through a built-in credential store, abstracting away token management and OAuth flows from individual server configurations. Provides a unified authentication interface that allows clients to authenticate once and access multiple authenticated MCP servers without re-entering credentials for each service.
Unique: Centralizes credential management for MCP servers in a desktop app rather than requiring each server to handle its own authentication, with claimed 'seamless' integration that abstracts authentication complexity from server configuration
vs alternatives: Reduces credential sprawl and simplifies authentication setup compared to manually configuring auth for each MCP server individually or using environment variables scattered across multiple configurations
Captures and visualizes all MCP protocol traffic, server events, and client interactions in a structured log viewer with filtering, search, and timeline capabilities. Provides detailed insight into request/response cycles, error conditions, and server state changes through a dashboard that displays logs in real-time as MCP servers process requests from connected clients.
Unique: Provides a dedicated GUI log viewer for MCP protocol traffic rather than requiring developers to parse raw logs from terminal output or server logs; integrates visualization of workspace-level activity across all connected servers and clients
vs alternatives: Offers better visibility into MCP interactions than manual log inspection or generic proxy logging tools by providing MCP-aware filtering and visualization tailored to the protocol's request/response structure
Exposes a unified MCP endpoint that multiple AI clients (Claude, Cursor, VSCode, Windsurf, Cline) can connect to, automatically discovering available MCP servers and their capabilities (tools, resources, prompts) without requiring manual configuration in each client. Handles connection lifecycle, client authentication, and capability advertisement through a single interface.
Unique: Provides a single MCP endpoint that abstracts away individual server configurations from multiple clients, with automatic capability discovery rather than requiring manual tool/resource registration in each client application
vs alternatives: Eliminates configuration duplication across multiple clients compared to manually configuring each MCP server connection in Claude, Cursor, VSCode, and other tools separately
Ensures all MCP server execution, request routing, and log processing occurs entirely on the local machine without transmitting data to external cloud services. Implements a fully self-contained architecture where MCP Router acts as a local control plane with no external dependencies for core functionality, providing cryptographic assurance that sensitive data in MCP requests/responses never leaves the machine.
Unique: Explicitly guarantees zero cloud transmission for all MCP operations through a fully local architecture, contrasting with cloud-based MCP management solutions that may transmit server configurations or logs to external services
vs alternatives: Provides stronger data privacy guarantees than cloud-based MCP management platforms by ensuring all processing remains on the local machine, eliminating transmission risk for sensitive data
Provides a GUI dashboard for discovering, installing, configuring, and managing MCP server integrations without requiring manual editing of configuration files or terminal commands. Displays available MCP servers with their capabilities, handles dependency installation, and manages server lifecycle through a visual interface with forms for credential and parameter configuration.
Unique: Provides a dedicated GUI dashboard for MCP server management rather than requiring developers to manually edit configuration files or use CLI tools, with visual server discovery and parameter configuration forms
vs alternatives: Reduces friction for MCP server setup and management compared to manual configuration file editing, making MCP more accessible to non-technical users and reducing configuration errors
Supports creating isolated workspace environments where different sets of MCP servers, credentials, and configurations can be maintained separately and switched between without affecting other workspaces. Enables developers to maintain distinct MCP setups for development, testing, and production environments with independent logging, credential stores, and server instances.
Unique: Provides workspace-level isolation for MCP configurations rather than requiring developers to manually manage separate MCP Router instances or configuration directories for different environments
vs alternatives: Enables easier environment switching and isolation compared to manually managing multiple MCP Router instances or configuration files, reducing the risk of accidentally using production credentials in development
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs MCP Router at 23/100. MCP Router leads on quality, while Supabase is stronger on ecosystem. Supabase also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities