| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Maintains a centralized, structured markdown-based registry of 100+ Model Context Protocol servers with standardized metadata fields (server name, description, GitHub links, star count, last updated timestamp). The hub uses a dual-interface architecture: an authoritative README.md source of truth synchronized with a web interface (mcp-servers-hub-website.pages.dev) that provides enhanced search, filtering, and sorting capabilities. Each server entry follows a consistent schema enabling systematic evaluation and discovery across diverse domain categories (data access, business applications, development tools, cloud services, financial systems, content management).
Unique: Uses a dual-interface architecture with markdown-based source of truth (README.md) synchronized to a web interface, enabling both programmatic access via raw GitHub content and enhanced UX via web search/filtering. Standardizes server metadata schema across 100+ entries with community metrics (stars) and maintenance indicators (last updated ISO timestamps), enabling comparative evaluation without visiting individual repositories.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive and actively curated than scattered GitHub awesome-lists; provides web-based discovery interface with filtering/sorting that awesome-lists lack, while maintaining version-controlled source in Git for transparency and community contributions.
Organizes the 100+ MCP servers into structured domain categories including Data Access Servers, Business Application Servers, Development Tool Servers, Cloud Service Servers, Financial Systems, Content Management, and Specialized Domain Integrations. Each category groups servers by functional purpose and integration domain, enabling developers to navigate the ecosystem by use case rather than alphabetically. The categorization is maintained in the README.md structure and reflected in the web interface's navigation and filtering system.
Unique: Implements domain-based categorization across 5+ functional categories (data access, business applications, development tools, cloud services, specialized domains) with explicit server groupings in README structure. Reflects categories in dual-interface architecture (markdown source + web UI filtering), enabling both programmatic category-based discovery and interactive browsing.
vs alternatives: Provides explicit domain categorization unlike generic awesome-lists that rely on alphabetical or submission-order sorting; enables faster discovery for domain-specific use cases while maintaining simplicity of markdown-based taxonomy.
Tracks and displays GitHub star counts and last-updated ISO timestamps for each MCP server, providing quantitative signals of community adoption and active maintenance. The hub maintains these metrics in the structured metadata table within README.md, enabling developers to assess server maturity, community support, and ongoing development activity at a glance. Star counts serve as a proxy for ecosystem adoption and community validation, while last-updated timestamps indicate whether a server is actively maintained or potentially abandoned.
Unique: Embeds GitHub star counts and ISO timestamp maintenance indicators directly in the structured metadata table within README.md, enabling quantitative comparison of server adoption and maintenance status without requiring developers to visit individual repositories. Dual-interface architecture surfaces these metrics in both raw markdown and enhanced web UI for accessibility.
vs alternatives: Provides explicit maintenance and adoption metrics in a single view, unlike awesome-lists that require manual repository visits to assess server health; enables data-driven server selection based on community signals.
Enforces a consistent metadata schema across all 100+ server entries in the catalog, with standardized fields: Server Name (@owner), Description, Stars (⭐ count), and Last Updated (ISO timestamp). This structured tabular format in README.md enables programmatic parsing, filtering, and comparison of servers without custom extraction logic. The schema provides a predictable data model that allows tools and scripts to reliably extract and process server information, supporting both human-readable discovery and machine-readable catalog access.
Unique: Implements a consistent four-field metadata schema (Name, Description, Stars, Last Updated) enforced across all 100+ server entries in a markdown table format within README.md. This standardization enables predictable parsing and comparison without custom extraction logic, while maintaining human readability and Git version control compatibility.
vs alternatives: Provides explicit schema consistency across all entries unlike unstructured awesome-lists; enables reliable programmatic access while maintaining simplicity of markdown format vs. requiring dedicated database or API infrastructure.
Maintains a dual-interface architecture where the authoritative server catalog lives in README.md (Git-versioned source of truth) and is synchronized with an enhanced web interface at mcp-servers-hub-website.pages.dev. The web interface provides search, filtering, sorting, and categorization capabilities while remaining synchronized with the repository source, enabling both programmatic access via raw GitHub content and interactive discovery via web UI. This architecture leverages Git for version control, community contributions, and transparency while providing modern UX for end users.
Unique: Implements a dual-interface architecture where Git-versioned README.md serves as authoritative source of truth, synchronized with a web interface (mcp-servers-hub-website.pages.dev) providing enhanced UX (search, filtering, sorting, categorization). This design leverages Git for version control and community contributions while providing modern discovery UX without requiring backend infrastructure.
vs alternatives: Combines Git-based transparency and contribution workflow of awesome-lists with modern web UI discovery capabilities; enables both programmatic access (raw GitHub content) and interactive browsing without requiring dedicated backend or database infrastructure.
Provides direct hyperlinks to the GitHub repository for each MCP server in the catalog, enabling one-click navigation to source code, documentation, and implementation details. Each server entry includes the repository owner and name in the format 'Server Name (@owner)', which links to the full GitHub repository. This design pattern allows developers to quickly evaluate server implementation quality, read documentation, review open issues, and assess code maturity without leaving the discovery interface.
Unique: Embeds direct GitHub repository links in the server name field using the format 'Server Name (@owner)', enabling one-click navigation to source code without requiring separate lookup or manual URL construction. This design pattern integrates repository discovery into the catalog interface itself.
vs alternatives: Provides direct source code access from the discovery interface unlike generic awesome-lists that may only include repository names; enables rapid evaluation of implementation quality without manual GitHub searching.
Provides foundational documentation explaining the Model Context Protocol (MCP) itself, including its purpose, architecture, and role in enabling bidirectional communication between LLMs and external data sources/tools. The hub includes educational content describing how MCP solves the integration challenge between conversational LLMs and structured external APIs, establishing a standardized interface layer that eliminates the need for custom integrations per service. This context helps developers understand why MCP servers matter and how they fit into broader AI application architecture.
Unique: Embeds MCP protocol education and ecosystem overview directly in the hub documentation, explaining MCP's purpose as a standardized interface layer solving the integration challenge between conversational LLMs and structured external APIs. This contextualizes why MCP servers exist and how they fit into broader AI application architecture.
vs alternatives: Provides MCP protocol context and education alongside server discovery, unlike generic awesome-lists that assume reader familiarity with the underlying technology; helps new developers understand the 'why' behind MCP servers, not just the 'what'.
Documents MCP server implementation architectures, development patterns, and contribution guidelines for developers building new MCP servers or extending existing ones. The hub includes sections on MCP Server Development Guidelines and Server Implementation Architectures, explaining how MCP servers are structured, what patterns are used across implementations, and how to contribute new servers to the hub. This guidance helps developers understand the ecosystem conventions and best practices for building compatible, maintainable MCP servers.
Unique: Documents MCP server implementation architectures and development guidelines within the hub, providing pattern examples and contribution guidance for developers building new servers. This contextualizes the catalog within a broader ecosystem of server development practices and conventions.
vs alternatives: Combines server discovery with implementation guidance and contribution workflows, unlike generic awesome-lists that only catalog existing projects; helps developers understand not just what servers exist, but how to build compatible new ones.
+1 more capabilities
Crawls 11+ heterogeneous platforms (Zhihu, Weibo, Bilibili, Twitter, Reddit, HackerNews, etc.) and RSS feeds using platform-specific scrapers, normalizes disparate data schemas into a unified NewsItem model, and deduplicates content across sources using fuzzy title matching and URL canonicalization. The system maintains platform-specific metadata (rank, heat value, engagement metrics) while presenting a single normalized feed, enabling cross-platform trend detection that would be invisible within individual platform silos.
Unique: Implements platform-specific crawler modules with unified NewsItem schema and fuzzy deduplication across 11+ heterogeneous sources (Chinese + international), rather than relying on single-platform APIs or generic RSS parsing. Maintains platform-specific metadata (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) for weighted hotspot scoring.
vs alternatives: Covers more platforms (especially Chinese social media) with deeper metadata extraction than generic RSS aggregators, and provides unified deduplication across sources unlike single-platform monitoring tools.
Implements a multi-stage filtering pipeline that matches news items against user-defined keywords using regex patterns, required word lists, and excluded word lists. The system applies frequency-based scoring (keyword occurrence count) combined with platform hotspot weights to rank filtered results. Configuration is stored in frequency_words.txt with support for regex patterns, AND/OR/NOT boolean operators, and per-keyword weighting. Filtering occurs at collection time (reducing storage) and again at report generation time (enabling dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling).
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching with frequency-based scoring and platform hotspot weighting (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) in a two-stage pipeline (collection-time and report-time filtering). Supports dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling by applying filters at report generation.
TrendRadar scores higher at 58/100 vs MCP Servers Hub at 24/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple keyword matching (supports regex and boolean logic) and more efficient than semantic filtering (no LLM overhead), making it suitable for real-time filtering at scale.
Detects newly emerged topics by comparing current crawl results against historical data stored in the system. Topics are marked as 🆕 (new) if they appear for the first time in the current crawl or if their hotspot rank increased significantly compared to previous crawls. The system tracks topic emergence velocity (how quickly a topic rises in rankings) and flags topics with unusual acceleration. New topic detection is performed at report generation time, enabling dynamic detection without re-crawling. The system maintains a historical hotspot index for comparison.
Unique: Detects new topics by comparing current hotspot rankings against historical data, marking topics with significant rank increases as 🆕. Tracks emergence velocity to distinguish breaking news from sustained trends.
vs alternatives: More efficient than semantic similarity detection (no LLM overhead) and more accurate than simple first-appearance detection (accounts for re-emerging topics), but requires historical baseline data.
Provides a web-based UI for editing TrendRadar configuration files (config.yaml, frequency_words.txt, timeline.yaml) with real-time validation and preview. The editor supports: (1) syntax highlighting for YAML and regex, (2) validation of keyword patterns (regex compilation check), (3) preview of filtered results based on current keyword configuration, (4) drag-and-drop channel configuration, (5) schedule preview (shows next 10 execution times). Changes are validated before saving, preventing configuration errors. The editor is optional; users can edit config files directly.
Unique: Provides web-based configuration editor with real-time validation, regex preview, and schedule visualization. Enables non-technical users to configure TrendRadar without editing YAML files.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual YAML editing and provides validation feedback, but adds operational complexity compared to file-based configuration.
Integrates LiteLLM to provide vendor-agnostic AI analysis and summarization of filtered news items. Users configure their preferred LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models, etc.) once in config.yaml, and the system automatically routes analysis requests to that provider. The AI analysis capability includes: (1) automated summarization of long articles into key points, (2) sentiment analysis (positive/negative/neutral), (3) trend prediction based on historical patterns, and (4) custom analysis prompts. Analysis results are cached to avoid redundant API calls and can be pushed directly to notification channels.
Unique: Uses LiteLLM abstraction layer to support any LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models) with single configuration, enabling provider switching without code changes. Caches analysis results to reduce redundant API calls and costs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded OpenAI integration (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than dedicated sentiment analysis APIs (can use local models), but slower than rule-based sentiment analysis.
Leverages LiteLLM to translate news content from source languages (primarily Chinese) to target languages (English, etc.) on-demand. The system detects source language automatically (via langdetect or similar), caches translations to avoid re-translating identical content, and batches translation requests to reduce API calls. Translations are stored alongside original content, enabling bilingual reports and multi-language notification delivery. Translation can be triggered at collection time (all news) or report time (only filtered news).
Unique: Implements provider-agnostic translation via LiteLLM with automatic language detection, content-based caching, and batch request optimization. Stores translations alongside originals for bilingual report generation.
vs alternatives: More flexible than dedicated translation APIs (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than commercial translation services when using local models, but slower than specialized translation APIs.
Implements a notification abstraction layer supporting 9+ delivery channels (WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc.). Each channel has a provider-specific formatter that converts normalized news items into channel-appropriate messages (e.g., WeChat card format, Telegram markdown, email HTML). The system batches notifications atomically—all news items for a report are sent as a single batch to each channel, ensuring consistency and reducing API calls. Message formatting respects channel constraints (character limits, attachment limits, etc.) and supports templating for customization.
Unique: Implements atomic message batching across 9+ heterogeneous channels with provider-specific formatters and constraint-aware truncation. Single configuration enables simultaneous delivery to WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc. without code changes.
vs alternatives: Supports more channels (especially Chinese platforms like WeWork, Feishu) than generic notification services, and batching reduces API calls and spam compared to per-item notifications.
Exposes TrendRadar's data and analysis capabilities as an MCP server, enabling AI agents and LLM applications to query trends, perform analysis, and generate insights through natural language. The MCP server implements tools for: (1) querying filtered news by keyword/date/platform, (2) retrieving trend statistics and hotspot rankings, (3) running custom analysis on news subsets, (4) generating reports in various formats. Clients (Claude, other LLM agents) can invoke these tools via MCP protocol, enabling conversational exploration of trends without direct database access. The server maintains state across multiple requests, allowing multi-turn conversations about trends.
Unique: Implements full MCP server exposing trend data and analysis tools to LLM agents, enabling conversational queries and multi-turn analysis workflows. Maintains state across requests and supports complex tool invocations (filtering, analysis, report generation).
vs alternatives: Enables conversational access to trends (vs. API-only access) and integrates with LLM agent workflows (vs. standalone tools), but adds operational complexity compared to simple REST APIs.
+4 more capabilities