| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Maintains a centralized, structured markdown-based registry of 100+ Model Context Protocol servers with standardized metadata fields (server name, description, GitHub links, star count, last updated timestamp). The hub uses a dual-interface architecture: an authoritative README.md source of truth synchronized with a web interface (mcp-servers-hub-website.pages.dev) that provides enhanced search, filtering, and sorting capabilities. Each server entry follows a consistent schema enabling systematic evaluation and discovery across diverse domain categories (data access, business applications, development tools, cloud services, financial systems, content management).
Unique: Uses a dual-interface architecture with markdown-based source of truth (README.md) synchronized to a web interface, enabling both programmatic access via raw GitHub content and enhanced UX via web search/filtering. Standardizes server metadata schema across 100+ entries with community metrics (stars) and maintenance indicators (last updated ISO timestamps), enabling comparative evaluation without visiting individual repositories.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive and actively curated than scattered GitHub awesome-lists; provides web-based discovery interface with filtering/sorting that awesome-lists lack, while maintaining version-controlled source in Git for transparency and community contributions.
Organizes the 100+ MCP servers into structured domain categories including Data Access Servers, Business Application Servers, Development Tool Servers, Cloud Service Servers, Financial Systems, Content Management, and Specialized Domain Integrations. Each category groups servers by functional purpose and integration domain, enabling developers to navigate the ecosystem by use case rather than alphabetically. The categorization is maintained in the README.md structure and reflected in the web interface's navigation and filtering system.
Unique: Implements domain-based categorization across 5+ functional categories (data access, business applications, development tools, cloud services, specialized domains) with explicit server groupings in README structure. Reflects categories in dual-interface architecture (markdown source + web UI filtering), enabling both programmatic category-based discovery and interactive browsing.
vs alternatives: Provides explicit domain categorization unlike generic awesome-lists that rely on alphabetical or submission-order sorting; enables faster discovery for domain-specific use cases while maintaining simplicity of markdown-based taxonomy.
Tracks and displays GitHub star counts and last-updated ISO timestamps for each MCP server, providing quantitative signals of community adoption and active maintenance. The hub maintains these metrics in the structured metadata table within README.md, enabling developers to assess server maturity, community support, and ongoing development activity at a glance. Star counts serve as a proxy for ecosystem adoption and community validation, while last-updated timestamps indicate whether a server is actively maintained or potentially abandoned.
Unique: Embeds GitHub star counts and ISO timestamp maintenance indicators directly in the structured metadata table within README.md, enabling quantitative comparison of server adoption and maintenance status without requiring developers to visit individual repositories. Dual-interface architecture surfaces these metrics in both raw markdown and enhanced web UI for accessibility.
vs alternatives: Provides explicit maintenance and adoption metrics in a single view, unlike awesome-lists that require manual repository visits to assess server health; enables data-driven server selection based on community signals.
Enforces a consistent metadata schema across all 100+ server entries in the catalog, with standardized fields: Server Name (@owner), Description, Stars (⭐ count), and Last Updated (ISO timestamp). This structured tabular format in README.md enables programmatic parsing, filtering, and comparison of servers without custom extraction logic. The schema provides a predictable data model that allows tools and scripts to reliably extract and process server information, supporting both human-readable discovery and machine-readable catalog access.
Unique: Implements a consistent four-field metadata schema (Name, Description, Stars, Last Updated) enforced across all 100+ server entries in a markdown table format within README.md. This standardization enables predictable parsing and comparison without custom extraction logic, while maintaining human readability and Git version control compatibility.
vs alternatives: Provides explicit schema consistency across all entries unlike unstructured awesome-lists; enables reliable programmatic access while maintaining simplicity of markdown format vs. requiring dedicated database or API infrastructure.
Maintains a dual-interface architecture where the authoritative server catalog lives in README.md (Git-versioned source of truth) and is synchronized with an enhanced web interface at mcp-servers-hub-website.pages.dev. The web interface provides search, filtering, sorting, and categorization capabilities while remaining synchronized with the repository source, enabling both programmatic access via raw GitHub content and interactive discovery via web UI. This architecture leverages Git for version control, community contributions, and transparency while providing modern UX for end users.
Unique: Implements a dual-interface architecture where Git-versioned README.md serves as authoritative source of truth, synchronized with a web interface (mcp-servers-hub-website.pages.dev) providing enhanced UX (search, filtering, sorting, categorization). This design leverages Git for version control and community contributions while providing modern discovery UX without requiring backend infrastructure.
vs alternatives: Combines Git-based transparency and contribution workflow of awesome-lists with modern web UI discovery capabilities; enables both programmatic access (raw GitHub content) and interactive browsing without requiring dedicated backend or database infrastructure.
Provides direct hyperlinks to the GitHub repository for each MCP server in the catalog, enabling one-click navigation to source code, documentation, and implementation details. Each server entry includes the repository owner and name in the format 'Server Name (@owner)', which links to the full GitHub repository. This design pattern allows developers to quickly evaluate server implementation quality, read documentation, review open issues, and assess code maturity without leaving the discovery interface.
Unique: Embeds direct GitHub repository links in the server name field using the format 'Server Name (@owner)', enabling one-click navigation to source code without requiring separate lookup or manual URL construction. This design pattern integrates repository discovery into the catalog interface itself.
vs alternatives: Provides direct source code access from the discovery interface unlike generic awesome-lists that may only include repository names; enables rapid evaluation of implementation quality without manual GitHub searching.
Provides foundational documentation explaining the Model Context Protocol (MCP) itself, including its purpose, architecture, and role in enabling bidirectional communication between LLMs and external data sources/tools. The hub includes educational content describing how MCP solves the integration challenge between conversational LLMs and structured external APIs, establishing a standardized interface layer that eliminates the need for custom integrations per service. This context helps developers understand why MCP servers matter and how they fit into broader AI application architecture.
Unique: Embeds MCP protocol education and ecosystem overview directly in the hub documentation, explaining MCP's purpose as a standardized interface layer solving the integration challenge between conversational LLMs and structured external APIs. This contextualizes why MCP servers exist and how they fit into broader AI application architecture.
vs alternatives: Provides MCP protocol context and education alongside server discovery, unlike generic awesome-lists that assume reader familiarity with the underlying technology; helps new developers understand the 'why' behind MCP servers, not just the 'what'.
Documents MCP server implementation architectures, development patterns, and contribution guidelines for developers building new MCP servers or extending existing ones. The hub includes sections on MCP Server Development Guidelines and Server Implementation Architectures, explaining how MCP servers are structured, what patterns are used across implementations, and how to contribute new servers to the hub. This guidance helps developers understand the ecosystem conventions and best practices for building compatible, maintainable MCP servers.
Unique: Documents MCP server implementation architectures and development guidelines within the hub, providing pattern examples and contribution guidance for developers building new servers. This contextualizes the catalog within a broader ecosystem of server development practices and conventions.
vs alternatives: Combines server discovery with implementation guidance and contribution workflows, unlike generic awesome-lists that only catalog existing projects; helps developers understand not just what servers exist, but how to build compatible new ones.
+1 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs MCP Servers Hub at 24/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities