| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements semantic search by converting text inputs into embeddings and querying a vector store to find semantically similar content. The system includes built-in deduplication logic that identifies and filters duplicate or near-duplicate entries before storage, reducing redundant vectors in the index and improving search precision. Uses configurable embedding providers and supports similarity-based ranking to surface the most relevant results.
Unique: Integrates deduplication directly into the search pipeline rather than as a post-processing step, preventing duplicate vectors from being stored in the first place. Uses configurable embedding providers with a unified interface, allowing swapping providers without changing application code.
vs alternatives: Lighter-weight than Pinecone or Weaviate for simple use cases because it handles embeddings and deduplication in-process without requiring a separate managed service, though with lower scalability for massive datasets.
Provides a provider-agnostic interface for embedding generation that abstracts away the specifics of different embedding APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, local models, etc.). Developers configure a provider once and the system handles API calls, token counting, batching, and error handling transparently. The abstraction allows swapping providers without modifying application code, enabling cost optimization or model switching.
Unique: Uses a provider plugin pattern where each embedding service (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) implements a common interface, allowing runtime provider swapping without recompilation. Abstracts token counting and batch size limits per provider to prevent API errors.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoding a single embedding service because it decouples application logic from provider specifics, whereas LangChain's embedding abstraction requires more boilerplate configuration.
Provides a unified storage interface that supports both in-memory and persistent backends (file-based, database, etc.) for storing embeddings and metadata. The abstraction allows applications to start with in-memory storage for development and switch to persistent storage for production without code changes. Handles serialization, deserialization, and basic CRUD operations across different storage backends.
Unique: Separates storage interface from implementation, allowing in-memory and persistent backends to be swapped at configuration time. Uses a common CRUD interface across all backends, reducing cognitive load for developers managing multiple storage strategies.
vs alternatives: Simpler than managing separate in-memory caches and persistent databases because a single abstraction handles both, whereas typical applications require glue code to sync between layers.
Indexes memories with associated metadata (timestamps, source, tags, custom attributes) alongside embeddings, enabling filtering and contextual retrieval beyond pure semantic similarity. The system stores metadata in a queryable format and allows filtering search results by metadata predicates (e.g., 'memories from the last 24 hours' or 'memories tagged as critical'). Metadata is preserved through storage and retrieval cycles.
Unique: Stores metadata alongside embeddings in the same index rather than as a separate layer, enabling efficient combined semantic + metadata queries. Metadata is treated as first-class data, not an afterthought, allowing rich filtering without separate lookups.
vs alternatives: More integrated than adding metadata as a post-retrieval filter because it pushes filtering into the index, reducing the number of candidates to rank and improving query performance.
Processes multiple texts in batches for embedding generation and indexing, with built-in error handling and retry logic for failed embeddings. The system groups texts into provider-appropriate batch sizes, handles partial failures gracefully, and allows resuming failed batches without re-processing successful entries. Provides progress tracking and detailed error reporting for debugging batch operations.
Unique: Integrates error recovery directly into the batch pipeline rather than requiring external orchestration, tracking which items succeeded and failed to enable resumable operations. Uses provider-specific batch size optimization to maximize throughput while respecting API limits.
vs alternatives: More fault-tolerant than naive batch loops because it tracks state and allows resuming from failures, whereas simple loops lose progress on any error.
Manages the selection and ordering of retrieved memories to fit within an LLM's context window constraints. The system ranks retrieved memories by relevance, truncates or summarizes to stay within token limits, and provides formatted context strings ready for injection into LLM prompts. Supports configurable context window sizes and prioritization strategies (e.g., recency vs. relevance).
Unique: Treats context window management as a first-class concern in the memory system rather than delegating it to application code, providing built-in token budgeting and memory selection strategies. Formats memories for direct LLM consumption without additional processing.
vs alternatives: More integrated than manually selecting and formatting memories in application code because it automates token budgeting and prioritization, reducing boilerplate in LLM agent loops.
Detects and removes semantically similar memories using embedding similarity scores and configurable thresholds, preventing redundant information from accumulating in the memory store. The system compares new memories against existing ones using cosine similarity or other distance metrics, and either rejects duplicates or merges them based on configuration. Deduplication runs automatically on insertion or can be triggered manually on existing memory stores.
Unique: Performs deduplication at insertion time using embedding similarity rather than exact matching, catching semantic duplicates that keyword-based deduplication would miss. Threshold configuration allows tuning sensitivity without code changes.
vs alternatives: More effective than hash-based deduplication because it catches semantically similar memories even with different wording, whereas exact matching only catches identical text.
Automatically manages memory lifecycle by tracking creation/access timestamps and removing or archiving memories based on configurable expiration policies. The system supports time-based expiration (e.g., delete memories older than 30 days), access-based expiration (e.g., delete unused memories), and custom lifecycle hooks. Expired memories can be archived rather than deleted for audit trails or later recovery.
Unique: Treats memory expiration as a configurable policy rather than manual cleanup, enabling automatic lifecycle management without application intervention. Supports archival as a first-class operation, preserving expired memories for compliance.
vs alternatives: More automated than manual memory cleanup because policies run automatically, whereas typical applications require explicit deletion logic scattered throughout the codebase.
+1 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs @membank/core at 26/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities