| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Stores and retrieves entities, relations, and observations in a local JSON file using a graph-based data model. The server implements MCP Tools that allow clients to create entities (with properties), define typed relationships between entities, and record observations tied to entities. Data persists across conversation sessions in a single JSON file, enabling stateful knowledge accumulation without requiring external databases or network calls.
Unique: Official MCP reference implementation using TypeScript SDK with a deliberately simple JSON file backend (not a database) to demonstrate how MCP Tools can expose memory operations. The graph model separates entities (with properties), relations (typed edges), and observations (timestamped facts), allowing LLMs to reason about both structure and temporal context.
vs alternatives: Simpler to deploy and understand than vector-database RAG systems because it uses explicit entity/relation storage instead of embeddings, making the knowledge graph directly inspectable and editable by humans or LLMs.
Exposes memory graph operations as MCP Tools (function-calling interface) that LLM clients can invoke. The server implements Tools following the MCP protocol specification, including tool definitions with JSON schemas, input validation, and structured responses. Each Tool maps to a specific memory operation (create entity, add relation, record observation, query entities) and returns results in a format the LLM can parse and reason about.
Unique: Implements the MCP Tool primitive as defined in the protocol specification, using TypeScript SDK's tool registration API. Each Tool includes a JSON schema describing parameters, enabling LLM clients to understand available operations without hardcoding. The server validates inputs against schemas before execution.
vs alternatives: More transparent than REST API endpoints because Tool schemas are introspectable by the LLM, allowing it to discover and reason about available operations; more structured than free-form function calling because schemas enforce parameter contracts.
Provides a Tool that allows clients to create new entities in the knowledge graph with arbitrary key-value properties. The implementation stores entities with unique IDs, names, and a properties object. Properties can be strings, numbers, or booleans. The Tool validates that entity names are non-empty and returns the created entity with its assigned ID, enabling the LLM to reference the entity in subsequent operations.
Unique: Implements entity creation as a simple MCP Tool with automatic ID generation (likely UUID or sequential), allowing the LLM to create entities without managing ID assignment. Properties are stored as a flat key-value object, keeping the model simple for reference implementation purposes.
vs alternatives: Simpler than schema-based entity systems (like RDF or property graphs with strict typing) because it accepts any properties, making it more flexible for exploratory LLM use cases where entity structure isn't known in advance.
Provides Tools to create directed relationships between entities with a specified relation type (e.g., 'works_on', 'knows', 'parent_of'). Relationships are stored as source entity ID, target entity ID, and relation type string. The implementation allows querying relationships by source entity, target entity, or relation type, returning matching relationships. This enables the LLM to express and retrieve semantic connections between entities.
Unique: Implements relationships as simple typed edges in the knowledge graph, using string relation types rather than a fixed ontology. This allows the LLM to define relationship semantics on-the-fly while keeping the implementation lightweight. The reference design stores relationships in a flat list, making it easy to understand but not optimized for large graphs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than RDF triples because relation types are arbitrary strings rather than URIs, and more explicit than embedding-based similarity because relationships are discrete, queryable facts rather than continuous vectors.
Provides a Tool to record observations (facts or events) associated with one or more entities, with automatic timestamp recording. Observations are stored as text content, associated entity IDs, and a creation timestamp. The implementation allows querying observations by entity, enabling the LLM to retrieve historical facts about entities. This enables the system to track events, notes, or discoveries over time.
Unique: Observations are first-class citizens in the memory model alongside entities and relationships, allowing the LLM to record facts that don't fit neatly into entity properties or relationships. Automatic server-side timestamps provide temporal ordering without requiring the LLM to manage time explicitly.
vs alternatives: More suitable for conversational memory than pure entity-relationship models because observations capture natural language facts and events, while timestamps enable temporal reasoning without requiring explicit time entities.
Provides Tools to query the knowledge graph and retrieve entities, relationships, and observations. The implementation supports querying by entity ID, entity name (substring or exact match), relationship type, or observation content. Results are returned as structured JSON arrays, allowing the LLM to inspect the graph state and make decisions based on current knowledge. Queries are executed by filtering the in-memory graph representation.
Unique: Queries are implemented as simple in-memory filters over the JSON graph structure, making the implementation transparent and easy to understand. The reference design prioritizes clarity over performance, suitable for small-to-medium graphs but not optimized for large-scale deployments.
vs alternatives: More transparent than vector database queries because results are exact matches rather than similarity-based, making it easier for the LLM to reason about what was found and why; simpler to debug than SQL queries because the data model is flat JSON.
Implements the MCP server lifecycle using the TypeScript SDK, including initialization, Tool registration, request handling, and graceful shutdown. The server supports standard MCP transports (stdio, HTTP, SSE) through SDK abstractions. On startup, the server loads the JSON memory file (or creates it if missing), registers all memory Tools with the MCP protocol, and begins accepting requests from MCP clients. The implementation handles connection lifecycle events and ensures the JSON file is persisted after each operation.
Unique: Uses the official MCP TypeScript SDK to implement server lifecycle, abstracting away transport details and protocol handling. The reference implementation demonstrates the minimal boilerplate needed to create an MCP server, making it an educational example for developers learning the SDK.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building an MCP server from scratch using raw JSON-RPC because the SDK handles protocol compliance, transport abstraction, and Tool registration; more maintainable than custom server implementations because it follows official patterns.
Persists the entire knowledge graph to a single JSON file on disk after each operation. The implementation reads the JSON file on server startup, maintains the graph in memory, and writes the entire graph back to the file after create/update operations. The file format is a JSON object containing arrays of entities, relationships, and observations. This approach ensures data survives server restarts but requires the entire graph to be serialized on each write.
Unique: Uses a simple JSON file as the storage backend rather than a database, making the implementation portable and debuggable. The entire graph is serialized on each write, prioritizing simplicity and correctness over performance — suitable for reference implementation but not production use.
vs alternatives: More portable than database-backed persistence because it requires no external services or setup; more inspectable than binary formats because the JSON is human-readable; simpler than transaction-based systems because it avoids complex consistency logic.
+1 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Memory MCP Server scores higher at 59/100 vs Supabase at 42/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities