| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 10 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Scans codebases across 20+ package managers (npm, pip, Maven, NuGet, Gradle, Composer, etc.) by parsing dependency manifests and lock files, then constructs a transitive dependency graph to identify all direct and indirect open-source components. Uses fingerprinting and version matching against a continuously-updated vulnerability database to detect known CVEs, license violations, and outdated packages without requiring source code compilation.
Unique: Maintains a proprietary vulnerability database updated in real-time from multiple sources (NVD, GitHub Security Advisories, vendor disclosures) with fingerprinting that handles version aliasing and package renames across ecosystems, enabling detection of vulnerabilities missed by simpler string-matching approaches
vs alternatives: Broader package manager coverage (20+) and faster vulnerability detection than open-source tools like OWASP Dependency-Check due to curated database and fingerprint-based matching rather than CVE ID string search
Analyzes detected vulnerabilities and generates pull requests that upgrade vulnerable dependencies to patched versions, using semantic versioning constraints and compatibility analysis to minimize breaking changes. The system evaluates multiple upgrade paths (patch, minor, major) and prioritizes based on risk severity, testing impact, and maintainer activity, then commits changes with detailed changelog and remediation rationale.
Unique: Uses machine-learning-based compatibility scoring that analyzes historical upgrade patterns, test pass rates, and maintainer activity to predict which version upgrades are least likely to introduce regressions, rather than simply recommending the latest available version
vs alternatives: Generates more intelligent upgrade recommendations than Dependabot because it factors in compatibility risk and maintainer responsiveness, not just semantic versioning rules, resulting in fewer failed CI builds and merge conflicts
Exposes REST APIs to programmatically query vulnerability data, scan results, and compliance metrics, enabling custom integrations with enterprise security tools (SIEM, ticketing systems, dashboards). Supports bulk export of vulnerability data in multiple formats (JSON, CSV, SARIF) for integration with downstream security orchestration platforms. Enables organizations to build custom reports and dashboards on top of Mend.io data using their preferred BI tools.
Unique: Provides comprehensive REST APIs with support for multiple export formats (JSON, CSV, SARIF) and fine-grained filtering, enabling deep integration with enterprise security platforms without requiring custom parsing
vs alternatives: Offers more flexible data export options than Snyk or Dependabot, with native SARIF support for integration with GitHub Advanced Security and other SARIF-compatible tools
Performs deep static code analysis by parsing source code into abstract syntax trees (ASTs) across 15+ programming languages, then applies pattern-matching rules to detect security vulnerabilities such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), hardcoded credentials, insecure cryptography, and unsafe deserialization. Rules are context-aware and track data flow through function calls and variable assignments to reduce false positives compared to regex-based scanning.
Unique: Combines AST-based semantic analysis with taint tracking to follow data flow through assignments and function calls, enabling detection of vulnerabilities that simple pattern matching would miss, while maintaining language-specific context awareness for reduced false positives
vs alternatives: More accurate than regex-based SAST tools (SonarQube, Checkmarx) for complex data flow vulnerabilities because it understands code structure and variable scope, but slower than lightweight linters due to full AST parsing and taint analysis
Scans Docker and OCI container images by extracting and analyzing each layer's filesystem, identifying vulnerable packages installed in the base OS (Alpine, Ubuntu, CentOS, etc.) and application dependencies within the image. Performs SCA on package managers present in the image and cross-references against vulnerability databases, providing a complete inventory of all software components and their known vulnerabilities with remediation guidance at the Dockerfile or base image level.
Unique: Performs layer-by-layer extraction and analysis rather than scanning the flattened image, enabling identification of which Dockerfile instruction introduced vulnerable packages and providing targeted remediation (e.g., 'upgrade base image from ubuntu:20.04 to ubuntu:22.04')
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than Trivy or Grype because it analyzes application-level dependencies within the image (not just OS packages) and provides Dockerfile-level remediation guidance, though slower due to full layer extraction
Analyzes all detected open-source dependencies and their associated licenses (from SPDX database, package metadata, and source code inspection), then evaluates compliance against configurable policies that define approved/restricted licenses, copyleft requirements, and commercial usage restrictions. Generates compliance reports and can block builds or flag PRs if policy violations are detected, enabling organizations to enforce licensing standards across teams.
Unique: Combines automated license detection with configurable policy engines that support exception workflows and risk-based categorization (e.g., 'GPL is allowed in non-commercial projects but restricted in commercial products'), rather than simple allow/deny lists
vs alternatives: More flexible than FOSSA or Black Duck because it allows custom policy rules and exception workflows, enabling organizations to balance open-source adoption with legal risk rather than enforcing one-size-fits-all policies
Uses machine learning models trained on vulnerability exploitation patterns, CVSS scores, exploit availability, and organizational context to rank detected vulnerabilities by actual risk rather than severity alone. Factors in whether exploits are publicly available, if the vulnerable code path is reachable in the application, the organization's threat model, and historical patch adoption rates to provide context-aware prioritization that helps teams focus on the most critical issues first.
Unique: Combines CVSS scoring with exploit availability data, organizational threat modeling, and patch adoption history in a machine-learning model to produce context-aware risk scores that account for real-world exploitation likelihood rather than theoretical vulnerability severity
vs alternatives: More actionable than static CVSS scoring because it incorporates exploit availability and organizational context, but less accurate than manual security review for organization-specific threat models due to reliance on historical training data
Monitors repositories and container registries on a configurable schedule (continuous, daily, weekly) for new vulnerabilities, license violations, and policy violations, then automatically triggers remediation workflows (PR generation, notifications, build blocking) based on severity thresholds and organizational policies. Integrates with CI/CD systems to enforce security gates that prevent vulnerable code or images from reaching production.
Unique: Integrates monitoring, detection, and remediation into a single workflow that respects organizational policies and CI/CD constraints, automatically generating PRs only when policies allow and blocking builds when violations exceed thresholds, rather than requiring manual intervention for each vulnerability
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than Dependabot because it covers SCA, SAST, and container scanning in a unified workflow with policy-driven automation, though requires more configuration to set up correctly
+3 more capabilities
Aggregates 67 TB of source code from the Software Heritage archive, filtering for permissively licensed repositories (MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD, etc.) across 600+ programming languages. Uses automated license detection and validation to ensure legal compliance for model training. Implements a rigorous deduplication pipeline at file and repository levels to eliminate redundant training data and reduce dataset bloat.
Unique: Largest open-source code dataset at 67 TB with automated opt-out governance allowing repository owners to request removal, combined with rigorous deduplication and PII removal pipeline — no other public dataset offers this scale with legal compliance and community control mechanisms
vs alternatives: Larger and more legally compliant than GitHub's CodeSearchNet (14M files) or Google's BigQuery public datasets, with explicit opt-out governance vs. implicit inclusion, and covers 600+ languages vs. Codex training data's undisclosed language distribution
Implements a community-driven opt-out system where repository owners can request removal of their code from the dataset without legal takedown notices. Maintains a registry of excluded repositories and re-applies exclusions during dataset updates. Provides transparent governance documentation and a clear submission process for removal requests, balancing open access with creator rights.
Unique: First large-scale code dataset to implement opt-out governance at dataset level rather than relying solely on license compliance, with transparent registry and community submission process — shifts power from dataset creators to code contributors
vs alternatives: More respectful of creator autonomy than GitHub Copilot's training approach (no opt-out) or academic datasets (one-time snapshot), and more scalable than individual DMCA takedowns
The Stack v2 scores higher at 61/100 vs Mend.io at 55/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Automated pipeline that scans source code for personally identifiable information (email addresses, API keys, SSH keys, credit card patterns, phone numbers) and removes or redacts them before dataset release. Uses regex patterns, entropy-based detection for secrets, and heuristic rules to identify sensitive data. Operates at file level with configurable sensitivity thresholds to balance data utility against privacy risk.
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching, entropy-based secret detection, and heuristic rules in a unified pipeline with configurable sensitivity — more comprehensive than simple regex-only approaches, but trades off false positive rate against security coverage
vs alternatives: More thorough than GitHub's secret scanning (which only flags known patterns) because it includes entropy-based detection for unknown secret formats, but less accurate than specialized tools like TruffleHog due to language-agnostic approach
Indexes 67 TB of source code across 600+ programming languages with language-aware metadata (syntax, file extension, language family). Enables retrieval by language, license, repository, or code patterns. Uses Software Heritage's existing indexing infrastructure as foundation, augmented with language detection and classification. Supports both bulk download and filtered queries for specific language subsets.
Unique: Leverages Software Heritage's existing language detection and indexing infrastructure, then augments with BigCode-specific language classification and filtering — avoids reinventing language detection while providing dataset-specific query capabilities
vs alternatives: More comprehensive language coverage (600+ languages) than GitHub's Linguist (500+ languages) and more accessible than Software Heritage's raw API because it's pre-filtered for permissive licenses and deduplicated
Removes duplicate code files and repositories using content hashing (SHA-256 or similar) and fuzzy matching for near-duplicates. Operates in two stages: exact deduplication via hash matching, then fuzzy matching (e.g., Jaccard similarity or MinHash) to catch semantically identical code with minor formatting differences. Preserves one canonical copy of each unique code pattern while removing redundant training examples.
Unique: Two-stage deduplication combining exact hash matching with fuzzy similarity matching (likely MinHash or Jaccard) to catch both identical and near-identical code — more thorough than single-stage approaches but computationally expensive
vs alternatives: More aggressive deduplication than CodeSearchNet (which uses simple hash matching) because it catches near-duplicates, but less semantic than clone detection tools (which understand code structure) because it's content-based
Integrates with Software Heritage's comprehensive archive of 200+ million repositories and their full version control history. Extracts source code snapshots from Software Heritage's Git/Mercurial/SVN repositories, preserving repository metadata (commit history, author info, timestamps). Provides access to code at specific points in time, enabling historical analysis or training on code evolution patterns.
Unique: Leverages Software Heritage's universal code archive (200M+ repositories) as data source, providing access to code that would be impossible to collect via GitHub API alone — enables training on archived/deleted repositories and non-GitHub platforms (GitLab, Gitea, etc.)
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than GitHub-only datasets because it includes code from GitLab, Gitea, SourceForge, and other platforms archived by Software Heritage; more legally defensible than web scraping because it uses an established, community-maintained archive
Tracks and validates SPDX license identifiers for each repository, ensuring only permissively licensed code (MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD, etc.) is included. Maintains license metadata alongside code files, enabling downstream users to verify legal compliance. Implements license hierarchy and compatibility checking to handle dual-licensed or complex licensing scenarios.
Unique: Combines automated SPDX detection with manual review and maintains license metadata alongside code, enabling downstream users to verify compliance — more transparent than datasets that simply claim 'permissive licenses' without proof
vs alternatives: More legally rigorous than GitHub's CodeSearchNet (which doesn't validate licenses) and more transparent than Codex training data (which doesn't disclose license filtering at all)
Maintains versioned snapshots of the dataset (e.g., v2.0, v2.1) with documented changes between versions (new repositories added, deduplication improvements, PII removal updates). Provides checksums and manifests for reproducibility, enabling researchers to cite specific dataset versions and reproduce results. Tracks dataset lineage and transformation history.
Unique: Maintains semantic versioning and detailed changelogs for dataset releases, enabling researchers to cite specific versions and understand dataset evolution — more rigorous than one-off dataset releases without versioning
vs alternatives: More reproducible than academic datasets that are released once without versioning, and more transparent than commercial datasets (Codex) that don't disclose version history or changes
+2 more capabilities