| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Integrates Model Context Protocol server functionality into AWS Lambda functions using Middy's middleware pattern, allowing Lambda handlers to expose MCP resources, tools, and prompts to Claude and other MCP clients. Works by wrapping Lambda event/response cycles with MCP protocol handlers that translate between Lambda invocation formats and MCP message schemas, enabling serverless MCP server deployment without custom orchestration logic.
Unique: Bridges Middy's middleware composition pattern with MCP protocol semantics, allowing developers to compose MCP server logic using familiar Middy hooks (before, after, onError) rather than building custom protocol handlers from scratch
vs alternatives: Eliminates boilerplate MCP protocol translation code compared to raw Lambda handlers, while leveraging Middy's mature middleware ecosystem for cross-cutting concerns like logging, error handling, and authentication
Enables Lambda functions to declare and expose MCP resources (files, documents, data) that MCP clients can discover and retrieve through the Model Context Protocol. Implements the MCP resource schema mapping, allowing developers to define resource URIs, MIME types, and retrieval logic within Lambda handler middleware, with automatic protocol serialization and error handling.
Unique: Provides declarative resource mapping within Middy middleware, allowing developers to define resource handlers as middleware functions that compose with other Lambda middleware, rather than implementing resource logic in separate handler files
vs alternatives: Simpler than building a custom REST API for resource serving because it reuses MCP's standardized resource protocol and integrates directly with Lambda's event model
Exposes Lambda-executable functions as MCP tools that MCP clients (like Claude) can discover and invoke through the Model Context Protocol. Translates MCP tool call requests into Lambda function invocations with parameter validation, executes the function, and returns results in MCP tool response format with automatic error serialization and type coercion.
Unique: Implements tool calling as a Middy middleware layer that intercepts MCP tool requests and routes them to Lambda function handlers, enabling composition of tool logic with other middleware (auth, logging, rate limiting) using Middy's hook system
vs alternatives: More integrated than exposing Lambda via REST API because it uses MCP's standardized tool schema and handles protocol translation automatically, reducing client-side complexity
Allows Lambda functions to define and expose MCP prompts (reusable prompt templates with arguments) that MCP clients can discover and execute. Implements prompt argument substitution, template rendering, and execution within Lambda middleware, translating MCP prompt requests into Lambda-based prompt execution with variable binding and output formatting.
Unique: Treats prompts as first-class MCP entities exposed through Middy middleware, enabling prompt logic to be composed with other Lambda middleware and versioned alongside function code
vs alternatives: More discoverable and standardized than embedding prompts in client code because MCP clients can enumerate available prompts and their arguments at runtime
Provides Middy middleware hooks (before, after, onError) for intercepting and transforming MCP protocol messages at various stages of Lambda execution. Enables developers to compose cross-cutting concerns like authentication, logging, rate limiting, and error handling as reusable middleware that applies to all MCP operations (resources, tools, prompts) without duplicating logic.
Unique: Leverages Middy's mature middleware composition pattern to apply to MCP protocol handling, allowing developers to reuse existing Middy middleware ecosystem (http-error-handler, validator, cors, etc.) for MCP servers
vs alternatives: More composable than monolithic MCP server implementations because middleware can be mixed and matched, tested independently, and shared across projects
Automatically validates incoming MCP protocol messages against JSON-RPC 2.0 schema and MCP operation-specific schemas (resource requests, tool calls, prompts), with structured error responses that conform to MCP error format. Implements error serialization, validation error reporting, and graceful degradation for malformed requests without crashing the Lambda handler.
Unique: Integrates MCP schema validation as a Middy middleware layer, enabling declarative validation rules that apply consistently across all MCP operations without per-handler validation code
vs alternatives: More maintainable than manual validation because schema changes automatically propagate to all handlers, and validation logic is centralized and testable
Automatically extracts and enriches Lambda execution context (request ID, function name, memory, timeout, environment variables) and makes it available to MCP operation handlers through Middy context object. Enables handlers to access Lambda metadata for logging, debugging, and conditional logic without manual context extraction.
Unique: Automatically extracts Lambda context into Middy context object, making Lambda metadata accessible to all middleware and handlers without manual extraction or parameter passing
vs alternatives: Simpler than manually accessing Lambda context in each handler because context is automatically available through Middy's context object
Abstracts Lambda event source details (API Gateway, ALB, direct invocation, EventBridge) and normalizes them into MCP protocol messages, allowing the same MCP server code to handle requests from multiple event sources. Implements event source detection and translation logic in middleware, enabling deployment flexibility without code changes.
Unique: Implements event source abstraction as Middy middleware, allowing MCP protocol logic to remain independent of event source details and enabling middleware-based event source translation
vs alternatives: More flexible than event source-specific implementations because the same MCP server code works with multiple event sources without conditional logic
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 70/100 vs middy-mcp at 33/100. middy-mcp leads on ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities