| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.55e-7 per prompt token | $1.05e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates production-ready code across multiple programming languages by combining 10B activated parameters with chain-of-thought reasoning patterns optimized for multi-step coding tasks. The model uses a mixture-of-experts architecture (230B total parameters, 10B active) to route coding queries through specialized expert pathways, enabling context-aware code synthesis that maintains state across agent iterations without requiring external memory systems.
Unique: Uses selective activation of 10B parameters from a 230B mixture-of-experts pool specifically tuned for coding and agentic tasks, reducing inference latency while maintaining near-frontier code quality through expert routing rather than full-model inference
vs alternatives: More efficient than full-scale frontier models (GPT-4, Claude 3.5) for code generation while maintaining competitive quality through specialized expert routing; faster inference than dense 70B models due to sparse activation
Performs multi-step reasoning across diverse domains (math, logic, knowledge retrieval) using chain-of-thought decomposition patterns embedded in the model weights. The architecture supports both free-form reasoning and structured output generation through prompt-based formatting, enabling downstream systems to parse model outputs as JSON, YAML, or other structured formats without requiring external parsing layers.
Unique: Embeds chain-of-thought reasoning patterns directly in model weights through training on reasoning-heavy datasets, enabling multi-step decomposition without requiring external prompting frameworks or specialized reasoning APIs
vs alternatives: Delivers reasoning capabilities at 10B active parameters comparable to 70B dense models through expert routing, reducing inference cost by 60-70% while maintaining structured output compatibility
Supports multi-turn conversational state management and function-calling patterns through OpenRouter's API interface, enabling agents to maintain context across sequential API calls and invoke external tools via structured function schemas. The model integrates with standard function-calling conventions (OpenAI-compatible format) to enable tool use without custom integration code, routing function calls through the sparse expert network for efficient decision-making.
Unique: Implements function-calling through OpenAI-compatible API contracts, enabling drop-in replacement of frontier models in existing agentic frameworks while reducing inference cost through sparse expert activation
vs alternatives: Maintains OpenAI function-calling API compatibility while operating at 10B active parameters, enabling cost-efficient agent deployment without rewriting tool-calling logic
Achieves near-frontier model performance through mixture-of-experts architecture that selectively activates 10 billion parameters from a 230 billion parameter pool based on input tokens. The routing mechanism learns to direct different input types (code, reasoning, general text) to specialized expert subnetworks, reducing per-token computation and memory requirements compared to dense models while maintaining output quality through expert specialization.
Unique: Implements conditional computation through expert routing that activates only 10B of 230B parameters per token, reducing inference cost and latency compared to dense models while maintaining competitive output quality through specialized expert pathways
vs alternatives: Achieves 60-70% inference cost reduction vs 70B dense models while maintaining comparable quality through expert specialization; more efficient than full-scale frontier models (GPT-4, Claude) for cost-sensitive production deployments
Generates and understands code across 10+ programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, etc.) through language-agnostic token representations and cross-language training data. The model learns syntactic and semantic patterns common across languages, enabling code translation, cross-language refactoring, and polyglot project understanding without language-specific fine-tuning.
Unique: Trained on balanced multi-language corpora with language-agnostic token representations, enabling code generation and translation across 10+ languages without language-specific model variants or fine-tuning
vs alternatives: Supports broader language coverage than specialized code models (Codex, StarCoder) while maintaining single-model efficiency; more practical than language-specific models for polyglot teams
Completes code by understanding surrounding context, including function signatures, variable types, and project patterns, through attention mechanisms that weight nearby tokens and learned code structure patterns. The model uses implicit codebase understanding (learned from training data) rather than explicit indexing, enabling completion without external code search or AST parsing infrastructure.
Unique: Achieves context-aware completion through learned code structure patterns and attention mechanisms without requiring external codebase indexing or AST parsing, reducing infrastructure complexity while maintaining competitive suggestion quality
vs alternatives: Simpler deployment than Copilot (no codebase indexing required) while maintaining context awareness; faster than tree-sitter-based approaches due to learned patterns vs explicit parsing
Maintains conversation context across multiple turns through stateful API interactions, where each turn includes full conversation history as input context. The model uses transformer attention to weight recent messages more heavily than distant history, enabling coherent multi-turn dialogue without explicit memory systems or external state stores.
Unique: Implements multi-turn memory through full conversation history inclusion in each API call with learned attention weighting, enabling stateless deployment without external memory systems while maintaining conversation coherence
vs alternatives: Simpler deployment than systems requiring persistent memory stores; comparable coherence to frontier models while operating at 10B active parameters
Follows complex instructions and system prompts through learned instruction-following patterns developed during training on instruction-tuned datasets. The model interprets system-level directives (tone, format, constraints) and applies them consistently across responses, enabling role-playing, output formatting, and behavioral customization without model fine-tuning.
Unique: Implements instruction-following through learned patterns from instruction-tuned training data, enabling behavioral customization via prompts without model fine-tuning or external control mechanisms
vs alternatives: Comparable instruction-following to frontier models while operating at 10B active parameters; more flexible than fixed-behavior models but less controllable than fine-tuned variants
+2 more capabilities
GLM-5.1 executes multi-step coding tasks over extended timeframes without requiring human intervention between steps, using an internal planning mechanism that decomposes complex objectives into sub-tasks and maintains execution state across sequential operations. Unlike minute-level interaction models that require prompting after each step, this capability enables the model to autonomously navigate decision trees, handle errors, and adapt strategy based on intermediate results without context resets.
Unique: Designed specifically for minute+ autonomous execution windows rather than single-turn interactions; maintains internal execution state and decision-making across extended task horizons without requiring external orchestration or re-prompting between steps
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude for long-horizon coding tasks because it's architected for continuous autonomous operation rather than stateless request-response cycles
GLM-5.1 generates and refactors code with awareness of the full codebase structure, dependencies, and patterns, using semantic understanding of how changes in one file propagate to others. The model analyzes import graphs, function signatures, and usage patterns across files to ensure generated code maintains consistency and doesn't introduce breaking changes, rather than treating each file in isolation.
Unique: Maintains semantic awareness of codebase structure and cross-file dependencies during generation, enabling it to make coordinated changes across multiple files rather than treating each file independently
vs alternatives: Produces more consistent multi-file refactorings than Copilot or Claude because it reasons about the entire codebase context simultaneously rather than file-by-file
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 scores higher at 24/100 vs MiniMax: MiniMax M2 at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5.1 diagnoses errors and bugs by analyzing error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and suggest fixes. The model correlates error symptoms with likely causes, explains why errors occur, and provides specific debugging steps or code fixes.
Unique: Diagnoses errors by correlating symptoms with root causes using semantic understanding of code and error patterns, providing explanations and fixes rather than just pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at diagnosing subtle bugs than search-based solutions because it reasons about code semantics and error causality
GLM-5.1 identifies performance bottlenecks in code and suggests optimizations with specific implementation guidance, analyzing algorithms, data structures, and resource usage to recommend improvements. The model understands performance implications of different approaches and can suggest algorithmic or architectural changes to improve efficiency.
Unique: Suggests optimizations based on algorithmic and architectural analysis rather than just code-level tweaks, understanding performance implications of different approaches
vs alternatives: Provides more meaningful performance guidance than generic LLMs because it understands algorithm complexity and can suggest structural improvements
GLM-5.1 analyzes code for security vulnerabilities including injection attacks, authentication/authorization issues, cryptographic weaknesses, and data exposure risks, providing specific remediation guidance. The model understands common vulnerability patterns and security best practices to identify risks and suggest secure implementations.
Unique: Identifies security vulnerabilities through semantic analysis of code patterns and provides remediation guidance based on security best practices, not just pattern matching against known CVEs
vs alternatives: More effective at finding context-specific security issues than SAST tools because it understands code intent and can suggest secure implementations
GLM-5.1 performs step-by-step reasoning about code behavior by internally simulating or tracing execution paths, allowing it to predict runtime behavior, identify bugs, and explain code logic without requiring actual execution. This capability uses chain-of-thought-like reasoning applied specifically to code semantics, tracking variable state, control flow, and function call sequences to reason about correctness.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning specifically to code semantics and execution paths, enabling it to predict runtime behavior and identify subtle bugs through symbolic execution simulation rather than pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at finding subtle logic bugs than GPT-4 because it explicitly traces execution state rather than relying on pattern recognition
GLM-5.1 maintains rich context across multiple conversation turns when working on code, remembering previous edits, design decisions, and constraints without requiring users to re-specify them. The model builds an internal model of the codebase state and user intent that persists across turns, enabling iterative refinement where each turn builds on previous work rather than starting fresh.
Unique: Maintains stateful context across turns specifically optimized for code collaboration, remembering design decisions and codebase state without explicit memory structures
vs alternatives: Provides better iterative code refinement than stateless models because it retains context about previous edits and design intent across turns
GLM-5.1 translates natural language specifications into code that preserves semantic intent, handling ambiguous or underspecified requirements by inferring reasonable implementations based on context and common patterns. The model uses semantic understanding of both natural language and code to bridge the gap between high-level intent and low-level implementation details.
Unique: Translates natural language to code with explicit semantic fidelity checking, inferring reasonable implementations for underspecified requirements rather than producing literal or incomplete code
vs alternatives: Handles ambiguous requirements better than Copilot because it uses semantic reasoning to infer intent rather than pattern matching against training data
+5 more capabilities