| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.90e-7 per prompt token | $3.00e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 8 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates code across multiple programming languages using a 10-billion parameter sparse mixture-of-experts architecture that activates only necessary computational pathways per token, reducing latency and inference cost compared to dense models while maintaining code quality. The model uses selective parameter activation to route different code patterns (syntax, logic, libraries) through specialized expert networks, enabling fast completion and generation without full model computation.
Unique: Uses sparse mixture-of-experts with 10B activated parameters instead of dense 70B+ models, achieving sub-500ms latency through selective expert routing while maintaining competitive code quality across 40+ languages
vs alternatives: Faster and cheaper than Copilot or Claude for code generation due to sparse activation, but may sacrifice nuance on complex multi-file refactoring compared to dense 70B+ models
Enables multi-step reasoning and tool-use workflows by integrating function calling capabilities with chain-of-thought decomposition, allowing the model to plan tasks, call external APIs/tools, and adapt based on results. The model processes tool schemas, generates structured function calls, and maintains reasoning state across multiple turns to coordinate complex workflows without explicit orchestration code.
Unique: Combines sparse-activation efficiency with agentic reasoning, enabling cost-effective multi-turn tool orchestration without the latency overhead of larger models, using selective expert routing to optimize for planning and tool-call generation
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than GPT-4 or Claude for agentic workflows due to sparse activation, but may require more explicit prompt engineering for complex multi-tool coordination compared to larger models
Improves response quality through few-shot examples and prompt engineering by encoding example input-output pairs into the context window and using attention mechanisms to learn patterns from examples. The model generalizes from provided examples to handle similar tasks without explicit fine-tuning, adapting its behavior based on demonstrated patterns.
Unique: Leverages sparse expert routing to activate task-specific experts based on example patterns, enabling efficient few-shot learning without full model computation while maintaining generation quality
vs alternatives: More flexible than fine-tuned models for rapid task changes, but less reliable than fine-tuning for consistent performance on complex tasks
Delivers tokens incrementally via server-sent events (SSE) or streaming HTTP responses, enabling real-time display of generated text in user interfaces without waiting for full response completion. The model streams tokens at sub-100ms intervals, allowing frontend applications to render text progressively and provide immediate feedback to users.
Unique: Optimized streaming implementation leveraging sparse activation to reduce per-token latency, enabling sub-100ms token delivery intervals without sacrificing throughput, making it suitable for real-time interactive applications
vs alternatives: Faster token delivery than dense models due to sparse activation, providing better real-time UX than batch-only APIs, though streaming overhead is higher than optimized batch inference
Processes and generates code across 40+ programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, Go, Rust, etc.) using language-agnostic tokenization and language-specific expert routing within the sparse mixture-of-experts architecture. The model maintains consistent code quality and semantic understanding across languages by routing language-specific patterns through dedicated expert networks.
Unique: Uses language-specific expert routing within sparse MoE to maintain consistent code quality across 40+ languages without separate model checkpoints, enabling efficient polyglot code generation through selective expert activation per language
vs alternatives: More efficient than maintaining separate language-specific models, but may sacrifice language-specific optimization compared to specialized models like Codex for Python or specialized Rust models
Generates contextually relevant code completions by leveraging surrounding code context, function signatures, imports, and project structure to inform generation. The model uses attention mechanisms to weight relevant context tokens and sparse expert routing to select code-generation experts based on detected patterns in the surrounding code.
Unique: Combines sparse expert routing with attention-based context weighting to deliver fast context-aware completions without full codebase indexing, using selective expert activation to optimize for completion generation based on detected code patterns
vs alternatives: Faster than Copilot for single-file completions due to sparse activation, but lacks persistent codebase indexing for cross-file context awareness that Copilot Enterprise provides
Maintains conversation history and generates contextually relevant responses across multiple turns by encoding previous messages into the model's context window and using attention mechanisms to track conversation state. The model processes the full conversation history (up to context limit) to generate responses that reference prior messages, maintain topic coherence, and adapt tone based on conversation flow.
Unique: Optimizes multi-turn conversation through sparse expert routing that activates conversation-specific experts based on detected dialogue patterns, reducing per-turn latency while maintaining coherence across turns
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than GPT-4 for long conversations due to sparse activation, but may lose context in very long conversations (100+ turns) compared to models with larger context windows
Generates structured outputs (JSON, YAML, XML) that conform to provided schemas by constraining token generation to valid schema paths and validating outputs against schema constraints. The model uses guided generation or constrained decoding to ensure outputs match specified formats without post-processing or validation logic.
Unique: Implements constrained generation through sparse expert routing that enforces schema validity at token level, avoiding invalid outputs without post-processing while maintaining generation speed through selective expert activation
vs alternatives: More efficient schema enforcement than post-processing validation, but may sacrifice generation flexibility compared to models with larger context windows for complex schema navigation
+3 more capabilities
Generates natural language responses mimicking Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus writing style through fine-tuning on Qwen2.5 72B base model. Uses instruction-tuned architecture to follow complex multi-step prompts while maintaining coherent, well-structured prose with appropriate tone and formality levels. The model learns stylistic patterns from Claude outputs during fine-tuning rather than using retrieval or prompt engineering alone.
Unique: Fine-tuned specifically on Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus output patterns rather than generic instruction-tuning, creating a style-matched alternative that preserves Anthropic's prose characteristics while running on Qwen2.5's 72B architecture
vs alternatives: Offers Claude-quality writing at lower cost than Anthropic's API and with more deployment flexibility than proprietary models, though with less transparency about training methodology than fully open-source alternatives like Llama
Maintains coherent multi-turn dialogue through transformer-based attention mechanisms that track conversation history and speaker context. The instruction-tuned architecture processes entire conversation threads as input, allowing the model to reference previous exchanges, maintain consistent character/tone, and resolve pronouns and references across turns without explicit memory structures.
Unique: Inherits Qwen2.5's instruction-tuning approach to conversation, which explicitly trains on multi-turn formats with clear role markers, enabling better context resolution than models trained primarily on single-turn examples
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than systems requiring external memory stores (RAG, vector DBs) since context is handled natively, but less sophisticated than models with explicit memory architectures or retrieval-augmented approaches for very long conversations
Magnum v4 72B scores higher at 25/100 vs MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1 at 24/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Generates code snippets and technical explanations by applying instruction-tuned patterns learned from fine-tuning on Claude outputs. The model understands code context from natural language descriptions, can generate multiple programming languages, and provides explanations alongside code. Implementation relies on transformer attention over code tokens and learned associations between natural language intent and code patterns.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's code generation outputs, capturing Anthropic's approach to code explanation and safety considerations (e.g., error handling suggestions) rather than pure code-to-code translation
vs alternatives: Provides better code explanations and safety context than specialized code models like CodeLlama, but likely slower and less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on code-only datasets
Applies learned chain-of-thought reasoning patterns from Claude fine-tuning to break down complex problems into steps. The model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, using transformer attention to track logical dependencies across reasoning chains. This is achieved through instruction-tuning on examples where Claude explicitly shows reasoning work.
Unique: Inherits Claude's explicit chain-of-thought training approach, which emphasizes showing reasoning work as part of the output rather than reasoning internally, making reasoning patterns visible and auditable
vs alternatives: More transparent reasoning than models without explicit chain-of-thought training, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on mathematical reasoning datasets or formal logic
Condenses long-form text into summaries while preserving key information, using attention mechanisms to identify salient content and instruction-tuned patterns for summary formatting. The model learns from Claude's summarization style, which emphasizes clarity and hierarchical organization of information. Works by attending to important tokens and generating compressed representations.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's summarization outputs, which emphasize hierarchical structure and clear topic organization rather than extractive summarization, producing more readable abstracts
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and readability than extractive summarization tools, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on summarization tasks or using dedicated abstractive architectures
Executes complex, multi-part instructions by parsing task structure and maintaining execution context across steps. The instruction-tuned architecture learns to identify task boundaries, handle conditional logic (if-then patterns), and sequence operations correctly. Implementation relies on transformer attention to track task state and learned patterns from Claude's instruction-following training.
Unique: Trained on Claude's instruction-following patterns, which emphasize explicit acknowledgment of task structure and step-by-step execution reporting, making task progress transparent
vs alternatives: More reliable instruction-following than base models without instruction-tuning, but less specialized than models with explicit task planning architectures or reinforcement learning from human feedback on instruction compliance
Answers questions by understanding context, identifying relevant information, and generating coherent responses. Uses transformer attention to locate answer-relevant tokens and instruction-tuned patterns to format responses appropriately. The model learns from Claude's question-answering style, which emphasizes accuracy, nuance, and acknowledgment of uncertainty.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's QA outputs, which emphasize acknowledging uncertainty, providing nuanced answers, and explaining reasoning rather than simple factual retrieval
vs alternatives: Better answer quality and nuance than retrieval-based QA systems, but without external knowledge bases or web search, limited to training data knowledge unlike RAG-augmented systems
Generates creative text including stories, essays, marketing copy, and other original content by learning stylistic patterns from Claude's creative outputs. The model uses transformer attention to maintain narrative coherence, character consistency, and thematic development across generated text. Fine-tuning captures Claude's approach to balancing creativity with clarity.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's creative outputs, which balance imaginative storytelling with clarity and coherence, producing more readable creative content than models trained purely on internet text
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and narrative coherence than base language models, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on creative writing datasets or with explicit story structure training