| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates coherent text across 100+ languages using a Transformer architecture with a 128K token context window, trained on multilingual corpora with a custom Tekken tokenizer that achieves 30% better compression efficiency than SentencePiece on code and non-English languages. The model maintains context awareness across extended conversations and documents through standard causal self-attention mechanisms scaled to handle 128K tokens without architectural modifications.
Unique: Custom Tekken tokenizer trained on 100+ languages achieves 2-3x compression efficiency on non-Latin scripts (Korean, Arabic) and ~30% better compression on code compared to SentencePiece and Llama 3 tokenizers, reducing token overhead for long-context inference
vs alternatives: Smaller (12B vs 70B+) and more efficient than Llama 3 or Gemma 2 while maintaining comparable multilingual performance, with better tokenizer efficiency reducing inference costs for non-English workloads
Generates and completes code across multiple programming languages using a Transformer trained with code-specific data and explicit function-calling capabilities. The model supports structured function invocation through a schema-based registry, enabling it to call external APIs and tools directly from generated code without requiring post-processing or manual parsing of function signatures.
Unique: Explicitly trained for function calling with native support for schema-based function invocation, enabling direct API calls from generated code without requiring separate parsing or validation layers
vs alternatives: Smaller model size (12B) than Codex or GPT-4 while maintaining function-calling capability, reducing inference latency and cost for code generation tasks in resource-constrained deployments
Trained to handle reasoning tasks and decompose complex problems into steps through Transformer architecture with extended context window enabling multi-step reasoning chains. The model can maintain reasoning state across multiple turns and generate intermediate reasoning steps, though specific reasoning techniques (chain-of-thought, tree-of-thought, etc.) are not documented.
Unique: Trained explicitly for reasoning tasks with extended 128K context enabling multi-step reasoning chains and complex problem decomposition, though specific reasoning techniques not disclosed
vs alternatives: Larger context window (128K vs 32K in Mistral 7B) enables longer reasoning chains without truncation, improving reasoning quality for complex multi-step problems
Developed in collaboration with NVIDIA with native optimization for NVIDIA GPU hardware and inference frameworks. The model includes NVIDIA NIM containerization, FP8 quantization support optimized for NVIDIA GPUs, and integration with NVIDIA's inference optimization tools, ensuring optimal performance on NVIDIA infrastructure without requiring manual tuning.
Unique: Co-developed with NVIDIA to include native optimizations for NVIDIA GPUs, FP8 support, and NIM containerization, ensuring optimal performance without manual tuning on NVIDIA infrastructure
vs alternatives: Pre-optimized for NVIDIA hardware vs generic models requiring manual optimization, reducing deployment friction for NVIDIA-based infrastructure
Processes natural language instructions and maintains coherent multi-turn conversations through an instruction-tuned variant trained with advanced fine-tuning and alignment techniques. The model uses standard Transformer decoder architecture with causal masking to track conversation history and respond contextually, evaluated against GPT-4o as a reference judge for instruction adherence and reasoning quality.
Unique: Instruction-tuned variant trained with advanced fine-tuning and alignment phase specifically optimizing for instruction adherence and multi-turn reasoning, with evaluation against GPT-4o as reference standard
vs alternatives: Smaller than instruction-tuned variants of Llama 3 or Gemma 2 while claiming comparable instruction-following quality, reducing deployment costs and latency for conversational applications
Supports FP8 (8-bit floating point) quantized inference without claimed performance degradation through quantization-aware training during model development. The model weights are pre-optimized for low-precision computation, enabling deployment on hardware with limited memory and reduced inference latency through native FP8 support in NVIDIA GPUs and compatible inference engines.
Unique: Quantization-aware training baked into model development enables FP8 inference with claimed zero performance loss, unlike post-training quantization approaches that typically degrade quality
vs alternatives: FP8 support without retraining or fine-tuning reduces deployment friction compared to models requiring post-hoc quantization, and smaller model size (12B) makes FP8 deployment viable on consumer-grade GPUs
Uses a custom Tekken tokenizer (based on Tiktoken architecture) trained on 100+ languages to achieve significantly better compression efficiency than standard tokenizers like SentencePiece or Llama 3's tokenizer. The tokenizer reduces token overhead by 30% on code and non-Latin languages, 2x on Korean, and 3x on Arabic, directly reducing inference cost and context window consumption for multilingual workloads.
Unique: Custom Tekken tokenizer trained on 100+ languages achieves 2-3x compression on non-Latin scripts and 30% on code through language-specific vocabulary optimization, compared to generic tokenizers trained on English-heavy corpora
vs alternatives: Better token efficiency than Llama 3 tokenizer on ~85% of languages and SentencePiece on code/non-Latin text, reducing per-token API costs and enabling longer context processing within fixed token budgets
Designed as a drop-in replacement for Mistral 7B with compatible API signatures and model interface, enabling existing applications built on Mistral 7B to switch to Nemo without code changes. The model maintains API compatibility while offering improved performance through larger parameter count (12B vs 7B) and extended context window (128K vs 32K), using identical Transformer architecture patterns.
Unique: Explicitly designed as drop-in replacement for Mistral 7B with identical API surface while increasing parameter count to 12B and context to 128K, enabling zero-code migration for existing deployments
vs alternatives: Easier migration path than switching to Llama 3 or Gemma 2 for existing Mistral users, with preserved API compatibility and prompt engineering work
+4 more capabilities
Provides a standardized evaluation framework for code generation models that accepts generated code in 17 programming languages (C, C++, C#, Java, Kotlin, Go, Rust, Python, Ruby, PHP, JavaScript, Perl, Haskell, OCaml, Scala, D, Pascal) and validates correctness through actual execution against unit tests via the ExecEval Docker-based execution engine. Uses a centralized problem definition model with src_uid foreign keys linking generated code to shared problem descriptions and unittest_db.json, enabling consistent evaluation across language variants of the same problem.
Unique: Combines 25M training examples across 7,500 unique problems with an execution-based evaluation pipeline (ExecEval) that actually runs generated code in Docker containers against unit tests, rather than relying on static analysis or string matching. The src_uid linking system creates a normalized data model where problem descriptions and tests are stored once and referenced by all language variants, eliminating duplication and ensuring consistency.
vs alternatives: Larger scale (25M examples vs typical 10-100K) and true execution-based validation across more languages (17 vs 4-6) than HumanEval or CodeXGLUE, with explicit support for code translation and repair tasks beyond generation.
Implements a foreign key linking system where all task-specific datasets (program synthesis, code translation, APR, retrieval) reference shared problem definitions via src_uid identifiers. Problem descriptions and unit tests are stored once in centralized problem_descriptions.jsonl and unittest_db.json files, then linked by src_uid to avoid duplication. The Hugging Face datasets API automatically resolves these links during data loading, returning enriched DatasetDict objects with problem context pre-joined to task examples.
Unique: Uses a normalized relational data model (src_uid as foreign key) for a code benchmark, treating problem definitions as a separate entity layer rather than embedding them in each task dataset. This is more sophisticated than typical flat-file benchmark structures and enables consistent multi-task evaluation on identical problems.
xCodeEval scores higher at 67/100 vs Mistral Nemo at 58/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More efficient than duplicating problem descriptions across 7 task datasets (reduces storage by ~30-40%), and enables automatic link resolution via Hugging Face API unlike manual CSV joins in CodeXGLUE or HumanEval variants.
Provides a Python API for loading xCodeEval datasets from Hugging Face Hub (NTU-NLP-sg/xCodeEval) with automatic src_uid-based linking between task datasets and shared problem definitions. The datasets library handles data downloading, caching, and streaming, while the xCodeEval integration automatically joins task examples with problem_descriptions.jsonl and unittest_db.json using src_uid foreign keys. Returns DatasetDict objects with enriched examples ready for model training or evaluation.
Unique: Integrates xCodeEval with Hugging Face datasets library, providing automatic src_uid resolution and streaming support. Treats data loading as a first-class concern with built-in linking logic, rather than requiring manual JSON parsing.
vs alternatives: More convenient than manual Git LFS downloads because it handles caching and automatic linking, and integrates seamlessly with Hugging Face training pipelines vs custom data loaders.
Provides an alternative data access method using Git LFS for users who prefer direct file access or need selective dataset downloads. Supports cloning the repository with LFS disabled, then pulling specific task files or problem definitions on demand. Useful for custom processing pipelines or environments where Python/Hugging Face is not available, though requires manual src_uid linking to join task examples with problem definitions.
Unique: Provides Git LFS-based alternative to Hugging Face API, enabling direct file access and selective downloads. Requires manual src_uid linking but offers more control over data access patterns.
vs alternatives: More flexible than Hugging Face API for selective downloads and custom pipelines, but requires more manual work for src_uid linking and lacks automatic caching/streaming.
Implements a standardized three-phase evaluation pipeline (Phase 1: Generation, Phase 2: Execution, Phase 3: Metrics) that applies consistently across all 7 tasks (program synthesis, code translation, APR, tag classification, code compilation, NL-code retrieval, code-code retrieval). Phase 1 generates or retrieves code, Phase 2 executes it via ExecEval or computes retrieval metrics, and Phase 3 aggregates results into pass@k, MRR, NDCG, or other task-specific metrics. Enables direct comparison of model performance across tasks.
Unique: Defines a unified three-phase evaluation pipeline that applies to all 7 tasks, treating generation, execution, and metric computation as separate concerns. Enables consistent evaluation methodology across diverse task types (generation, translation, retrieval, classification).
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than task-specific evaluation scripts because it provides a unified framework for all 7 tasks, and enables direct comparison of model performance across different task types.
Evaluates code generation models on the program synthesis task by accepting natural language problem descriptions and generating code solutions in any of 17 languages. The evaluation pipeline (Phase 1: Generation, Phase 2: Execution, Phase 3: Metrics) runs generated code against unit tests via ExecEval, computing pass@k metrics (pass@1, pass@10, etc.) that measure the probability of finding a correct solution within k samples. Supports both single-solution and multi-sample evaluation modes for assessing model reliability.
Unique: Implements a three-phase evaluation pipeline (Generation → Execution → Metrics) with explicit pass@k computation that measures the probability of finding a correct solution within k attempts, rather than just binary pass/fail. Supports multi-sample evaluation across 17 languages with language-specific compiler configurations and timeout handling.
vs alternatives: More rigorous than HumanEval's simple pass@k because it handles language-specific compilation errors and timeouts explicitly, and scales to 25M training examples vs HumanEval's 164 problems.
Evaluates code translation models by accepting source code in one language and generated translations in a target language, then validating functional equivalence through execution against shared unit tests. The translation evaluation pipeline compiles and executes both source and translated code against the same unittest_db.json test cases, comparing outputs to detect translation errors. Supports all 17 language pairs (though not all pairs may have training data) and uses language-specific compiler mappings to handle syntax differences.
Unique: Validates code translation by executing both source and target code against identical unit tests and comparing outputs, ensuring functional equivalence rather than syntactic similarity. Uses language-specific compiler mappings to handle the complexity of 17 different compilation environments and their idiosyncrasies.
vs alternatives: More rigorous than BLEU-score-based translation metrics because it validates actual functional correctness through execution, and covers more language pairs (17 vs typical 2-4) with explicit compiler integration.
Evaluates program repair models by providing buggy code snippets and expecting corrected versions that pass unit tests. The APR evaluation pipeline executes repaired code against unittest_db.json test cases, measuring whether the repair successfully fixes the bug without introducing new failures. Supports repairs across all 17 languages and uses the same execution-based validation as program synthesis, enabling direct comparison of repair quality.
Unique: Treats program repair as an executable task where success is measured by unit test passage, rather than syntactic similarity to reference repairs. Integrates with the same ExecEval pipeline as program synthesis, enabling direct performance comparison between generation and repair models.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than traditional APR benchmarks (Defects4J, QuixBugs) because it covers 17 languages and 7,500 problems vs 395 Java bugs, and uses consistent execution-based metrics across all repair types.
+5 more capabilities