Supermaven ranks higher at 71/100 vs Multi (Nightly) – Frontier AI Coding Agent at 38/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Multi (Nightly) – Frontier AI Coding Agent | Supermaven |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Extension | Extension |
| UnfragileRank | 38/100 | 71/100 |
| Adoption | 1 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 15 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Abstracts 30+ AI providers (Claude, Gemini, OpenAI, Anthropic, OpenRouter, Ollama, etc.) behind a unified interface, allowing users to define reusable profiles that bundle provider + model + configuration settings. Profiles persist across sessions and can be switched via UI without reconfiguring API keys or model parameters, enabling seamless provider switching without workflow interruption.
Unique: Supports 30+ providers with unified profile system that persists configurations as reusable presets, eliminating per-session reconfiguration overhead that competitors like Copilot (single provider) or Cline (manual provider switching) require
vs alternatives: Faster provider switching than Cline (which requires manual API key re-entry) and more flexible than GitHub Copilot (single provider lock-in) by bundling provider + model + settings into named profiles
Executes read, write, and edit operations on project files with configurable approval controls. Users can enable auto-approval for file reads, writes, or require explicit confirmation per operation. The agent accesses files within the project scope and can modify code, configuration, and documentation files without manual intervention when approval is granted, enabling hands-off refactoring and code generation workflows.
Unique: Implements approval gating at the operation level (read/write/edit) rather than per-file, allowing blanket auto-approval for reads while requiring confirmation for writes, reducing approval friction compared to Cline's per-action confirmation model
vs alternatives: More granular approval control than Copilot (which auto-applies suggestions) and less friction than Cline (which requires per-operation confirmation) by offering configurable approval presets per operation type
Allows developers to fork the current agent conversation and task state at any point, creating a parallel branch that preserves the original context while exploring alternative approaches. Forked tasks maintain independent state and can be merged back or abandoned without affecting the original task. This enables safe experimentation with multiple solutions while maintaining a clear audit trail of exploration paths.
Unique: Implements conversational context forking to enable parallel exploration of solutions while preserving original context, a capability absent in Copilot (stateless suggestions) and Cline (single task thread)
vs alternatives: Enables safe parallel experimentation with multiple approaches (unlike linear Copilot/Cline workflows) while maintaining full context preservation and audit trail
Persists agent task state (decomposed subtasks, execution progress, conversational context, intermediate results) to disk or cloud storage, enabling developers to close the IDE and resume work later without losing progress. The 'Restore' feature reconstructs the full task context, including file modifications, shell command history, and agent reasoning, allowing seamless continuation of long-running tasks across multiple sessions.
Unique: Persists full task state (decomposition, progress, context, results) across IDE sessions with restoration capability, enabling multi-session task continuity — a capability absent in Copilot (stateless) and Cline (chat-based with no persistence)
vs alternatives: Enables true task continuity across sessions (unlike stateless Copilot/Cline) by persisting full context and allowing seamless resumption without manual context re-entry
Analyzes project configuration files (package.json, pyproject.toml, go.mod, Cargo.toml, etc.), build scripts, and dependency manifests to understand the project's tech stack, frameworks, and conventions. The agent uses this understanding to generate code that follows project-specific patterns, uses the correct package manager, respects version constraints, and integrates with existing build/test infrastructure. This ensures generated code is immediately compatible with the project environment.
Unique: Analyzes project configuration to understand tech stack and generate code that respects version constraints and project conventions, whereas Copilot generates generic code and Cline requires manual context about project setup
vs alternatives: Generates immediately compatible code by understanding project stack and constraints (unlike Copilot's generic suggestions) without requiring manual context provision (unlike Cline's chat-based approach)
Accepts deadline constraints as input and uses them to prioritize task decomposition and execution order. The agent estimates task duration based on complexity and available time, reorders subtasks to meet deadlines, and alerts developers if tasks cannot be completed within the specified timeframe. This enables deadline-driven development where the agent adapts its strategy to time constraints.
Unique: Incorporates deadline constraints into task decomposition and prioritization, adapting execution strategy to time constraints — a capability absent in Copilot (stateless) and Cline (no deadline awareness)
vs alternatives: Enables deadline-driven development by automatically prioritizing tasks and estimating feasibility, reducing manual scope negotiation and timeline planning
Monitors developer activity patterns (active file, cursor position, typing speed, pause duration) to understand current focus and work flow. The agent uses this awareness to prioritize relevant suggestions, avoid interrupting deep focus periods, and surface task results at opportune moments. This enables non-intrusive agent assistance that adapts to developer work patterns.
Unique: Tracks developer activity to understand flow state and adapt agent assistance timing and relevance, whereas Copilot provides suggestions on-demand and Cline operates in chat mode without activity awareness
vs alternatives: Reduces context switching and interruption by timing suggestions to developer flow patterns (unlike Copilot's always-on suggestions) and prioritizing contextually relevant assistance
Executes arbitrary shell commands in the host environment with configurable approval gating. Commands run with the same permissions as the VS Code process and can be auto-approved or require explicit confirmation. The agent manages background task execution, allowing long-running processes (tests, builds, deployments) to run asynchronously while the developer continues coding, with task state persisted across IDE sessions via the 'Restore' feature.
Unique: Combines shell execution with background task management and state persistence via 'Restore' feature, allowing interrupted long-running processes to resume after IDE restart — a capability absent in Copilot and Cline which execute commands synchronously within the chat context
vs alternatives: Enables true background task execution (unlike Copilot's inline command suggestions) with state persistence across sessions, and offers approval gating (unlike Cline's auto-execution) to prevent accidental destructive commands
+7 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs Multi (Nightly) – Frontier AI Coding Agent at 38/100. Multi (Nightly) – Frontier AI Coding Agent leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities