Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct ranks higher at 24/100 vs Z.ai: GLM 4.5 at 24/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct | Z.ai: GLM 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 24/100 | 24/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $1.00e-6 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Hermes 3 405B maintains semantic coherence across extended multi-turn conversations through improved attention mechanisms and context windowing strategies that preserve long-range dependencies. The model uses architectural improvements over Hermes 2 to track conversation state, resolve pronouns and references across 10+ turns, and adapt response style based on accumulated dialogue history without degradation in reasoning quality.
Unique: Hermes 3 405B implements improved attention mechanisms and context preservation strategies specifically tuned for multi-turn coherence, addressing a known weakness in Hermes 2 where long conversations would lose semantic consistency. The 405B parameter scale enables better long-range dependency tracking compared to smaller instruction-tuned models.
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-3.5 and Llama 2 Chat on multi-turn conversation coherence benchmarks due to architectural improvements, though may lag behind GPT-4 on extremely complex reasoning chains spanning 50+ turns.
Hermes 3 405B includes advanced agentic capabilities that enable the model to decompose complex tasks into subtasks, reason about tool requirements, and generate structured plans for multi-step workflows. The model can analyze a goal, identify required tools or APIs, reason about execution order, and generate intermediate reasoning steps that guide tool selection and parameter binding.
Unique: Hermes 3 405B's agentic improvements enable explicit reasoning about tool selection and parameter binding before execution, rather than just generating tool calls. This is achieved through instruction-tuning on agent-specific datasets that teach the model to articulate its reasoning about why a tool is needed and how to use it.
vs alternatives: Provides better tool-aware reasoning than Llama 2 Chat or Mistral 7B due to explicit agentic training, though may require more careful prompt engineering than Claude 3 Opus which has more robust implicit tool reasoning.
Hermes 3 405B can translate text between languages while adapting for cultural context, idioms, and regional variations. The model understands that direct word-for-word translation often fails and can generate culturally appropriate translations that preserve meaning and intent rather than just literal translation.
Unique: Hermes 3 405B's translation capabilities benefit from the 405B parameter scale and diverse training data enabling better understanding of cultural context and idiomatic expressions. The model can adapt translations for cultural appropriateness better than smaller models.
vs alternatives: Provides competitive translation compared to GPT-3.5 for common language pairs, though specialized translation models like DeepL may provide better quality for specific language pairs.
Hermes 3 405B can manage conversational turn-taking, understand when to ask clarifying questions, and maintain natural dialogue flow. The model understands conversational conventions like turn-taking, can recognize when more information is needed, and generates responses that naturally continue dialogue rather than providing disconnected answers.
Unique: Hermes 3 405B's dialogue management capabilities are improved through instruction-tuning on conversational datasets emphasizing natural turn-taking and dialogue flow. The 405B scale enables better understanding of conversational context and conventions.
vs alternatives: Provides natural dialogue flow comparable to GPT-3.5 and Claude 3, though may require more explicit conversation management than specialized dialogue systems like Rasa.
Hermes 3 405B includes improved roleplay capabilities that enable the model to adopt and maintain consistent character personas, speech patterns, and behavioral traits across extended interactions. The model can understand character descriptions, adapt tone and vocabulary to match a persona, and maintain consistency in character knowledge and personality throughout a conversation.
Unique: Hermes 3 405B's improved roleplay is achieved through instruction-tuning on character-consistency datasets and explicit persona-maintenance patterns, enabling better adherence to character traits and speech patterns compared to Hermes 2. The 405B scale provides better semantic understanding of complex character descriptions.
vs alternatives: Outperforms Llama 2 Chat and Mistral 7B on character consistency metrics, though may require more explicit character reinforcement than specialized roleplay models like CharacterAI's proprietary models.
Hermes 3 405B can generate explicit reasoning chains that break down complex problems into logical steps, showing intermediate reasoning before arriving at conclusions. The model produces step-by-step explanations that articulate assumptions, logical deductions, and reasoning paths, enabling transparency into how it arrived at answers and supporting verification of reasoning quality.
Unique: Hermes 3 405B's reasoning improvements come from instruction-tuning on reasoning-focused datasets (similar to techniques used in models like Llama 2 with chain-of-thought training). The 405B parameter scale enables more complex reasoning chains with better logical consistency.
vs alternatives: Provides more transparent reasoning than smaller models like Mistral 7B, though may not match GPT-4's reasoning depth on highly complex mathematical or logical problems.
Hermes 3 405B can generate code across multiple programming languages, debug existing code, explain technical concepts, and solve programming problems. The model understands syntax, semantics, and best practices for languages including Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, SQL, and others, generating functional code that follows language conventions and common patterns.
Unique: Hermes 3 405B's code generation capabilities are improved over Hermes 2 through instruction-tuning on code-specific datasets and the 405B parameter scale, enabling better understanding of complex algorithms and multi-step implementations. The model can generate code with better adherence to language idioms and best practices.
vs alternatives: Provides competitive code generation compared to Copilot and CodeLlama for common languages, though may lag on specialized domains like Rust or Go where specialized models have more training data.
Hermes 3 405B demonstrates improved instruction-following capabilities that enable it to understand complex, multi-part instructions with nuanced constraints and edge cases. The model can parse instructions with conditional logic, multiple constraints, and implicit requirements, then generate outputs that satisfy all specified conditions while handling ambiguities gracefully.
Unique: Hermes 3 405B's instruction-following improvements come from instruction-tuning on datasets emphasizing constraint satisfaction and edge case handling. The 405B scale enables better parsing of complex, multi-part instructions with implicit dependencies.
vs alternatives: Provides better constraint handling than Llama 2 Chat due to explicit instruction-tuning, though may require more careful prompt engineering than Claude 3 which has more robust implicit constraint understanding.
+4 more capabilities
GLM-4.5 uses a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture to dynamically route tokens through specialized expert networks based on input characteristics, enabling efficient processing of 128k-token contexts without proportional latency increases. The MoE design allows selective expert activation per token, reducing computational overhead while maintaining reasoning depth across extended conversations and multi-document analysis tasks typical of agent-based workflows.
Unique: Mixture-of-Experts routing specifically tuned for agent workloads rather than generic dense models; expert activation patterns are optimized for tool-use sequences and multi-step reasoning rather than general language tasks
vs alternatives: Outperforms dense models like GPT-4 Turbo on agent tasks within 128k context by routing computational budget to relevant experts, reducing latency and cost vs. models that process all tokens through identical layers
GLM-4.5 implements native function calling through a schema-based registry where tools are defined as JSON schemas with parameter constraints, type validation, and description metadata. The model learns to emit structured tool invocations that map directly to function signatures, enabling deterministic tool orchestration without post-processing or regex parsing. Integration with OpenRouter's API exposes this via standard function-calling parameters compatible with OpenAI's format.
Unique: Schema-based function calling is trained directly into the model weights rather than implemented as post-hoc decoding constraints, allowing the model to learn semantic relationships between tool purposes and input context during training
vs alternatives: More reliable than constraint-based function calling (e.g., Guidance, LMQL) because tool selection is learned rather than enforced, reducing parsing failures and enabling the model to reason about tool applicability
Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct scores higher at 24/100 vs Z.ai: GLM 4.5 at 24/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-4.5 can be used for batch inference through OpenRouter's API, enabling cost-optimized processing of large numbers of requests. Batch processing typically offers reduced pricing compared to real-time API calls and is suitable for non-urgent inference tasks. The model can process batches of prompts efficiently, with results returned after processing completes. This is valuable for agents running scheduled tasks or processing large datasets.
Unique: Batch processing is offered through OpenRouter's unified API rather than a separate batch service, enabling seamless switching between real-time and batch modes with the same client code
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than real-time API for high-volume inference; simpler than managing separate batch infrastructure because OpenRouter handles queuing and result delivery
GLM-4.5 maintains coherent conversation state across turns by encoding prior messages into a compressed representation that persists within the 128k context window. The model uses attention mechanisms to selectively retrieve relevant prior context, enabling agents to reference earlier decisions, tool results, and user preferences without explicit memory management. This is particularly effective for agent workflows where state accumulation (e.g., task progress, discovered facts) must inform subsequent actions.
Unique: Implicit memory management through attention-based context selection rather than explicit memory modules; the model learns which prior turns are relevant without separate retrieval or summarization steps
vs alternatives: More efficient than explicit memory systems (e.g., LangChain's ConversationBufferMemory) because attention is computed once during inference rather than requiring separate retrieval and summarization passes
GLM-4.5 generates code across 40+ programming languages by leveraging training data that includes diverse codebases and syntax patterns. The model understands language-specific idioms, library conventions, and structural patterns (e.g., async/await in JavaScript, type hints in Python, generics in Java) without explicit language-specific modules. Generation is context-aware, respecting indentation, existing code style, and project conventions when completing or extending code snippets.
Unique: Language-agnostic code generation trained on diverse codebases rather than language-specific fine-tuning; the model generalizes syntax patterns across languages, enabling reasonable code generation even for less common languages
vs alternatives: Broader language coverage than specialized models like Codex (which emphasizes Python/JavaScript) but lower quality on niche languages compared to language-specific models; better for polyglot teams than single-language specialists
GLM-4.5 is trained on extensive technical documentation, API references, and code examples, enabling it to understand and reason about complex technical concepts, library APIs, and system architectures. The model can parse API schemas (OpenAPI, GraphQL, Protocol Buffers), understand parameter constraints and type systems, and generate code that correctly uses APIs based on documentation. This is particularly valuable for agent workflows that must interact with external systems.
Unique: Semantic understanding of API schemas and documentation is learned from training data rather than implemented as a separate schema parser; the model reasons about API semantics holistically
vs alternatives: More flexible than code-generation-only models because it understands API semantics and can reason about correctness; better than generic LLMs for technical tasks because training includes extensive API documentation
GLM-4.5 can generate responses that explicitly show reasoning steps, enabling transparency into how conclusions were reached. When prompted with chain-of-thought patterns, the model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, making it suitable for applications requiring explainability or verification. This is implemented through training on reasoning-annotated data and prompt patterns that encourage step-by-step decomposition.
Unique: Chain-of-thought reasoning is trained directly into the model rather than implemented as a decoding strategy; the model learns to generate reasoning steps as part of its core training objective
vs alternatives: More natural and coherent reasoning steps than prompt-injection approaches (e.g., appending 'think step by step') because reasoning is learned as a first-class capability
GLM-4.5 supports multiple languages (Chinese, English, and others) with training that enables cross-lingual reasoning — understanding concepts expressed in one language and reasoning about them in another. The model can translate, summarize, and reason across languages without language-specific degradation. This is particularly valuable for global applications and agents that must operate in multilingual environments.
Unique: Cross-lingual reasoning is learned from multilingual training data rather than implemented as separate language-specific models; the model develops a shared representation across languages
vs alternatives: More efficient than maintaining separate models per language because a single model handles all languages; better for cross-lingual reasoning than language-specific models because the shared representation enables concept transfer
+3 more capabilities