Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct ranks higher at 24/100 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1 at 24/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct | Z.ai: GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 24/100 | 24/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $1.00e-6 per prompt token | $1.05e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Hermes 3 405B maintains semantic coherence across extended multi-turn conversations through improved attention mechanisms and context windowing strategies that preserve long-range dependencies. The model uses architectural improvements over Hermes 2 to track conversation state, resolve pronouns and references across 10+ turns, and adapt response style based on accumulated dialogue history without degradation in reasoning quality.
Unique: Hermes 3 405B implements improved attention mechanisms and context preservation strategies specifically tuned for multi-turn coherence, addressing a known weakness in Hermes 2 where long conversations would lose semantic consistency. The 405B parameter scale enables better long-range dependency tracking compared to smaller instruction-tuned models.
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-3.5 and Llama 2 Chat on multi-turn conversation coherence benchmarks due to architectural improvements, though may lag behind GPT-4 on extremely complex reasoning chains spanning 50+ turns.
Hermes 3 405B includes advanced agentic capabilities that enable the model to decompose complex tasks into subtasks, reason about tool requirements, and generate structured plans for multi-step workflows. The model can analyze a goal, identify required tools or APIs, reason about execution order, and generate intermediate reasoning steps that guide tool selection and parameter binding.
Unique: Hermes 3 405B's agentic improvements enable explicit reasoning about tool selection and parameter binding before execution, rather than just generating tool calls. This is achieved through instruction-tuning on agent-specific datasets that teach the model to articulate its reasoning about why a tool is needed and how to use it.
vs alternatives: Provides better tool-aware reasoning than Llama 2 Chat or Mistral 7B due to explicit agentic training, though may require more careful prompt engineering than Claude 3 Opus which has more robust implicit tool reasoning.
Hermes 3 405B can translate text between languages while adapting for cultural context, idioms, and regional variations. The model understands that direct word-for-word translation often fails and can generate culturally appropriate translations that preserve meaning and intent rather than just literal translation.
Unique: Hermes 3 405B's translation capabilities benefit from the 405B parameter scale and diverse training data enabling better understanding of cultural context and idiomatic expressions. The model can adapt translations for cultural appropriateness better than smaller models.
vs alternatives: Provides competitive translation compared to GPT-3.5 for common language pairs, though specialized translation models like DeepL may provide better quality for specific language pairs.
Hermes 3 405B can manage conversational turn-taking, understand when to ask clarifying questions, and maintain natural dialogue flow. The model understands conversational conventions like turn-taking, can recognize when more information is needed, and generates responses that naturally continue dialogue rather than providing disconnected answers.
Unique: Hermes 3 405B's dialogue management capabilities are improved through instruction-tuning on conversational datasets emphasizing natural turn-taking and dialogue flow. The 405B scale enables better understanding of conversational context and conventions.
vs alternatives: Provides natural dialogue flow comparable to GPT-3.5 and Claude 3, though may require more explicit conversation management than specialized dialogue systems like Rasa.
Hermes 3 405B includes improved roleplay capabilities that enable the model to adopt and maintain consistent character personas, speech patterns, and behavioral traits across extended interactions. The model can understand character descriptions, adapt tone and vocabulary to match a persona, and maintain consistency in character knowledge and personality throughout a conversation.
Unique: Hermes 3 405B's improved roleplay is achieved through instruction-tuning on character-consistency datasets and explicit persona-maintenance patterns, enabling better adherence to character traits and speech patterns compared to Hermes 2. The 405B scale provides better semantic understanding of complex character descriptions.
vs alternatives: Outperforms Llama 2 Chat and Mistral 7B on character consistency metrics, though may require more explicit character reinforcement than specialized roleplay models like CharacterAI's proprietary models.
Hermes 3 405B can generate explicit reasoning chains that break down complex problems into logical steps, showing intermediate reasoning before arriving at conclusions. The model produces step-by-step explanations that articulate assumptions, logical deductions, and reasoning paths, enabling transparency into how it arrived at answers and supporting verification of reasoning quality.
Unique: Hermes 3 405B's reasoning improvements come from instruction-tuning on reasoning-focused datasets (similar to techniques used in models like Llama 2 with chain-of-thought training). The 405B parameter scale enables more complex reasoning chains with better logical consistency.
vs alternatives: Provides more transparent reasoning than smaller models like Mistral 7B, though may not match GPT-4's reasoning depth on highly complex mathematical or logical problems.
Hermes 3 405B can generate code across multiple programming languages, debug existing code, explain technical concepts, and solve programming problems. The model understands syntax, semantics, and best practices for languages including Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, SQL, and others, generating functional code that follows language conventions and common patterns.
Unique: Hermes 3 405B's code generation capabilities are improved over Hermes 2 through instruction-tuning on code-specific datasets and the 405B parameter scale, enabling better understanding of complex algorithms and multi-step implementations. The model can generate code with better adherence to language idioms and best practices.
vs alternatives: Provides competitive code generation compared to Copilot and CodeLlama for common languages, though may lag on specialized domains like Rust or Go where specialized models have more training data.
Hermes 3 405B demonstrates improved instruction-following capabilities that enable it to understand complex, multi-part instructions with nuanced constraints and edge cases. The model can parse instructions with conditional logic, multiple constraints, and implicit requirements, then generate outputs that satisfy all specified conditions while handling ambiguities gracefully.
Unique: Hermes 3 405B's instruction-following improvements come from instruction-tuning on datasets emphasizing constraint satisfaction and edge case handling. The 405B scale enables better parsing of complex, multi-part instructions with implicit dependencies.
vs alternatives: Provides better constraint handling than Llama 2 Chat due to explicit instruction-tuning, though may require more careful prompt engineering than Claude 3 which has more robust implicit constraint understanding.
+4 more capabilities
GLM-5.1 executes multi-step coding tasks over extended timeframes without requiring human intervention between steps, using an internal planning mechanism that decomposes complex objectives into sub-tasks and maintains execution state across sequential operations. Unlike minute-level interaction models that require prompting after each step, this capability enables the model to autonomously navigate decision trees, handle errors, and adapt strategy based on intermediate results without context resets.
Unique: Designed specifically for minute+ autonomous execution windows rather than single-turn interactions; maintains internal execution state and decision-making across extended task horizons without requiring external orchestration or re-prompting between steps
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude for long-horizon coding tasks because it's architected for continuous autonomous operation rather than stateless request-response cycles
GLM-5.1 generates and refactors code with awareness of the full codebase structure, dependencies, and patterns, using semantic understanding of how changes in one file propagate to others. The model analyzes import graphs, function signatures, and usage patterns across files to ensure generated code maintains consistency and doesn't introduce breaking changes, rather than treating each file in isolation.
Unique: Maintains semantic awareness of codebase structure and cross-file dependencies during generation, enabling it to make coordinated changes across multiple files rather than treating each file independently
vs alternatives: Produces more consistent multi-file refactorings than Copilot or Claude because it reasons about the entire codebase context simultaneously rather than file-by-file
Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct scores higher at 24/100 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1 at 24/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5.1 diagnoses errors and bugs by analyzing error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and suggest fixes. The model correlates error symptoms with likely causes, explains why errors occur, and provides specific debugging steps or code fixes.
Unique: Diagnoses errors by correlating symptoms with root causes using semantic understanding of code and error patterns, providing explanations and fixes rather than just pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at diagnosing subtle bugs than search-based solutions because it reasons about code semantics and error causality
GLM-5.1 identifies performance bottlenecks in code and suggests optimizations with specific implementation guidance, analyzing algorithms, data structures, and resource usage to recommend improvements. The model understands performance implications of different approaches and can suggest algorithmic or architectural changes to improve efficiency.
Unique: Suggests optimizations based on algorithmic and architectural analysis rather than just code-level tweaks, understanding performance implications of different approaches
vs alternatives: Provides more meaningful performance guidance than generic LLMs because it understands algorithm complexity and can suggest structural improvements
GLM-5.1 analyzes code for security vulnerabilities including injection attacks, authentication/authorization issues, cryptographic weaknesses, and data exposure risks, providing specific remediation guidance. The model understands common vulnerability patterns and security best practices to identify risks and suggest secure implementations.
Unique: Identifies security vulnerabilities through semantic analysis of code patterns and provides remediation guidance based on security best practices, not just pattern matching against known CVEs
vs alternatives: More effective at finding context-specific security issues than SAST tools because it understands code intent and can suggest secure implementations
GLM-5.1 performs step-by-step reasoning about code behavior by internally simulating or tracing execution paths, allowing it to predict runtime behavior, identify bugs, and explain code logic without requiring actual execution. This capability uses chain-of-thought-like reasoning applied specifically to code semantics, tracking variable state, control flow, and function call sequences to reason about correctness.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning specifically to code semantics and execution paths, enabling it to predict runtime behavior and identify subtle bugs through symbolic execution simulation rather than pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at finding subtle logic bugs than GPT-4 because it explicitly traces execution state rather than relying on pattern recognition
GLM-5.1 maintains rich context across multiple conversation turns when working on code, remembering previous edits, design decisions, and constraints without requiring users to re-specify them. The model builds an internal model of the codebase state and user intent that persists across turns, enabling iterative refinement where each turn builds on previous work rather than starting fresh.
Unique: Maintains stateful context across turns specifically optimized for code collaboration, remembering design decisions and codebase state without explicit memory structures
vs alternatives: Provides better iterative code refinement than stateless models because it retains context about previous edits and design intent across turns
GLM-5.1 translates natural language specifications into code that preserves semantic intent, handling ambiguous or underspecified requirements by inferring reasonable implementations based on context and common patterns. The model uses semantic understanding of both natural language and code to bridge the gap between high-level intent and low-level implementation details.
Unique: Translates natural language to code with explicit semantic fidelity checking, inferring reasonable implementations for underspecified requirements rather than producing literal or incomplete code
vs alternatives: Handles ambiguous requirements better than Copilot because it uses semantic reasoning to infer intent rather than pattern matching against training data
+5 more capabilities