Glide ranks higher at 70/100 vs @agent-infra/mcp-server-filesystem at 21/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | @agent-infra/mcp-server-filesystem | Glide |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | Product |
| UnfragileRank | 21/100 | 70/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) specification for reading file contents with support for large files through streaming. The server exposes a standardized read_file tool that accepts file paths and returns contents as UTF-8 text, with streaming capability to handle files larger than typical context windows. Uses MCP's transport layer (stdio or HTTP) to communicate with LLM clients and maintains protocol compliance for tool schema validation.
Unique: Implements MCP protocol natively for filesystem operations, enabling standardized tool calling from any MCP-compatible LLM client without custom integration code. Uses MCP's resource and tool abstractions to expose filesystem read as a first-class protocol capability rather than a generic function call.
vs alternatives: Provides protocol-level filesystem access vs. ad-hoc function calling, ensuring compatibility with any MCP client and reducing integration boilerplate compared to custom API wrappers.
Exposes a write_file tool through the MCP protocol that allows LLM clients to create or overwrite files on the filesystem. Implements atomic write patterns (write-to-temp-then-rename or similar) to prevent partial writes on failure. Validates file paths to prevent directory traversal attacks and enforces optional write restrictions based on allowed directories. Returns success/failure status and file metadata (size, path, timestamp) to the client.
Unique: Implements atomic write semantics within the MCP protocol layer, ensuring that failed writes don't leave partial files on disk. Uses temporary file + rename pattern to provide ACID-like guarantees for filesystem mutations triggered by LLM clients.
vs alternatives: Safer than direct file writes because atomic operations prevent corruption; more reliable than naive write implementations that don't handle failure cases, reducing data integrity issues in autonomous agent workflows.
Provides a list_directory tool that returns structured metadata about files and subdirectories (names, types, sizes, modification times) without reading full contents. Implements recursive directory traversal with optional depth limiting to prevent runaway queries on large directory trees. Returns results as JSON-serializable structures compatible with MCP's structured data format. Supports filtering by file type or pattern matching.
Unique: Exposes directory traversal as a first-class MCP tool with structured metadata output, allowing agents to make informed decisions about which files to read next. Implements depth limiting and pattern filtering at the protocol level rather than requiring client-side post-processing.
vs alternatives: More efficient than agents that blindly read all files because it provides metadata-only queries; better integrated than shell command wrappers because results are structured and type-safe.
Implements a delete_file tool that removes files or directories from the filesystem through the MCP protocol. Supports recursive deletion for directories with optional safety flags (e.g., require explicit confirmation for non-empty directories). Validates paths to prevent accidental deletion of critical system files. Returns confirmation of deletion and error details if operation fails.
Unique: Provides safe deletion semantics through MCP with path validation and optional recursive flags, preventing common mistakes like deleting parent directories. Integrates deletion as a managed tool rather than exposing raw shell commands.
vs alternatives: Safer than shell command execution because it validates paths and prevents directory traversal attacks; more controlled than direct filesystem APIs because it enforces MCP's tool calling semantics.
Exposes a stat_file tool that returns detailed filesystem metadata (size, permissions, timestamps, ownership, type) for files and directories without reading contents. Uses native filesystem stat calls to retrieve accurate, up-to-date metadata. Returns results as structured JSON compatible with MCP's data format. Useful for agents that need to make decisions based on file properties (e.g., skip large files, check modification times).
Unique: Provides filesystem stat operations as a structured MCP tool, enabling agents to make data-driven decisions about which files to process. Returns metadata in a standardized format that's consistent across operating systems.
vs alternatives: More efficient than reading file contents to determine size or type; more reliable than shell commands because metadata is returned in a structured, parseable format.
Implements path validation logic that prevents directory traversal attacks (e.g., ../../../etc/passwd) and enforces optional allowed-list restrictions on which directories agents can access. Uses path normalization and canonicalization to resolve symlinks and relative paths before checking against security boundaries. Validates all file operations (read, write, delete) against these rules before executing. Returns clear error messages when operations violate security policies.
Unique: Implements defense-in-depth path validation at the MCP server layer, preventing directory traversal and enforcing allowed-list policies before any filesystem operation executes. Uses path canonicalization to defeat symlink-based bypass attempts.
vs alternatives: More secure than relying on OS-level permissions alone because it validates paths at the application layer; more flexible than OS-level chroot because policies can be configured per agent or per operation.
Implements the MCP protocol specification for server-side communication, supporting multiple transport mechanisms (stdio, HTTP/SSE, WebSocket). Handles MCP message serialization/deserialization, request/response routing, and error handling according to the protocol specification. Manages tool schema registration and validation to ensure clients receive accurate capability descriptions. Provides hooks for custom transport implementations.
Unique: Implements the full MCP protocol stack including transport abstraction, message routing, and schema validation. Allows the same filesystem tools to be exposed to any MCP-compatible client without client-specific code.
vs alternatives: More standardized than custom API wrappers because it uses the MCP protocol; more flexible than direct function calling because it supports multiple transports and client types.
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 70/100 vs @agent-infra/mcp-server-filesystem at 21/100. @agent-infra/mcp-server-filesystem leads on ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities