| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Converts Zod schema definitions into JSON Schema format compatible with MCP tool parameter specifications. Uses Zod's introspection API to traverse schema AST and generate valid JSON Schema with proper type inference, validation constraints, and nested object support. Enables developers to define tool parameters once in TypeScript and automatically generate MCP-compliant schemas without manual JSON Schema authoring.
Unique: Provides bidirectional Zod↔JSON Schema conversion optimized for MCP's specific tool parameter requirements, leveraging Zod's native introspection rather than regex or AST parsing
vs alternatives: More maintainable than manual JSON Schema authoring and more type-safe than string-based schema templates because it validates at TypeScript compile-time
Transpiles XML Schema (XSD) definitions into JSON Schema format suitable for MCP tool parameters. Parses XSD element declarations, type definitions, and constraints (minOccurs, maxOccurs, pattern restrictions) and maps them to equivalent JSON Schema constructs. Enables teams with existing XSD-based tool specifications to integrate with MCP without rewriting schemas.
Unique: Handles XSD-specific constructs like xs:restriction, xs:extension, and cardinality constraints with explicit mapping rules to JSON Schema, rather than treating XSD as generic XML
vs alternatives: Preserves more semantic information from XSD than generic XML-to-JSON converters because it understands XSD type system semantics
Provides a unified validation interface that abstracts over multiple schema libraries (Zod, Yup, io-ts, Ajv) and converts their validation results into a standardized MCP-compatible format. Routes validation calls to the appropriate library backend based on schema type, normalizes error messages, and produces consistent validation reports. Enables MCP tool developers to use their preferred validation library without rewriting tool parameter handling logic.
Unique: Implements a strategy pattern for validation library routing with automatic error normalization, rather than requiring developers to manually call different validation APIs
vs alternatives: Reduces coupling to specific validation libraries compared to direct library usage, enabling easier library swaps and team standardization
Extracts TypeScript interface definitions and generates JSON Schema with embedded MCP tool metadata (descriptions, examples, required fields). Uses TypeScript compiler API to analyze interface structure, JSDoc comments, and type annotations, then produces JSON Schema with MCP-specific extensions for tool parameter documentation. Supports nested interfaces, union types, and optional fields with proper cardinality mapping.
Unique: Leverages TypeScript compiler API for precise type analysis rather than regex or AST parsing, enabling accurate handling of complex types and JSDoc metadata
vs alternatives: More accurate than string-based code generation because it understands TypeScript's type system semantics and can validate schema correctness at generation time
Validates incoming tool parameters against generated schemas and enforces constraints (min/max values, string patterns, enum restrictions, required fields). Applies validation rules in order of specificity and produces detailed error reports indicating which constraints failed and why. Integrates with the unified validation bridge to support multiple validation libraries while maintaining consistent constraint enforcement across all MCP tools.
Unique: Provides constraint-aware validation that understands MCP-specific requirements (required fields, parameter cardinality) rather than generic JSON Schema validation
vs alternatives: More informative error messages than raw JSON Schema validators because it maps validation failures back to MCP tool parameter semantics
Enables schema reuse through composition patterns (allOf, oneOf, anyOf) and inheritance hierarchies, allowing developers to define base parameter schemas and extend them for specific tools. Resolves $ref references, flattens composed schemas, and generates final MCP-compatible schemas. Supports parameter overrides and constraint refinement in child schemas while maintaining type safety and validation consistency.
Unique: Implements composition resolution with MCP-specific semantics (e.g., merging tool parameter metadata) rather than generic JSON Schema composition
vs alternatives: Reduces schema duplication more effectively than copy-paste approaches because it maintains single source-of-truth for shared parameter patterns
Validates that generated schemas conform to MCP protocol requirements (valid JSON Schema draft-7, proper tool parameter structure, required metadata fields). Performs static analysis on schemas to detect common issues (missing descriptions, invalid type combinations, unsupported constraints) and produces actionable error messages. Integrates with build pipelines to catch schema compliance issues before tools are deployed.
Unique: Validates against MCP-specific protocol requirements rather than generic JSON Schema validity, catching MCP-incompatible schemas that would pass standard validators
vs alternatives: Prevents MCP protocol violations earlier in development cycle than runtime error detection because it performs static analysis at schema generation time
Maintains consistency between TypeScript interface definitions and generated JSON Schema by detecting changes in either direction and propagating updates. Tracks schema versions, detects breaking changes (removed fields, type changes), and generates migration guides. Supports schema versioning and deprecation markers to help MCP clients adapt to schema evolution.
Unique: Implements bidirectional sync with breaking change detection, rather than one-way code generation, enabling developers to evolve schemas safely
vs alternatives: Catches schema drift earlier than manual reviews because it continuously monitors TypeScript↔JSON Schema consistency
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs modality-mcp-kit at 24/100. modality-mcp-kit leads on ecosystem, while Supabase is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities