TrendRadar ranks higher at 58/100 vs @msfeldstein/mcp-test-servers at 25/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | @msfeldstein/mcp-test-servers | TrendRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | Repository |
| UnfragileRank | 25/100 | 58/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Provides a suite of minimal but fully functional MCP server implementations (ping, resource, combined, env-echo) that demonstrate correct protocol compliance and server initialization patterns. Each server implements the MCP specification's required message handlers and resource/tool registration flows, allowing developers to validate their MCP client implementations against known-good server behavior without external dependencies.
Unique: Bundles multiple working MCP server implementations in a single npm package with explicit protocol compliance focus, eliminating the need to build test servers from scratch or rely on external services for MCP client validation
vs alternatives: Faster iteration than building custom test servers from scratch and more reliable than testing against production MCP servers that may have different behavior or availability constraints
Includes deliberately broken server implementations (broken-tool, crash-on-startup) that trigger specific failure modes and error conditions defined in the MCP specification. These servers allow developers to validate error handling paths in their MCP clients by reproducing edge cases like malformed tool definitions, unhandled exceptions during initialization, and protocol violations without needing to manually craft error scenarios.
Unique: Provides pre-built failure scenarios as executable servers rather than mock objects or test fixtures, enabling integration-level testing of error handling paths with actual protocol-level failures
vs alternatives: More realistic than unit test mocks because it exercises the full MCP protocol stack including connection handling and message serialization, while being more controlled than testing against real-world servers
Implements the MCP resource capability, allowing test servers to expose named resources (files, data, or computed content) that clients can request and retrieve through the MCP protocol. The resource server maintains a registry of available resources with metadata and serves content on-demand, demonstrating the resource discovery and retrieval patterns defined in the MCP specification.
Unique: Implements resource serving as a first-class MCP capability with proper metadata registration and discovery patterns, rather than treating resources as a secondary feature or mock data
vs alternatives: Demonstrates the full resource lifecycle (discovery, metadata, retrieval) in a single working server, whereas most MCP examples focus only on tool calling
Provides working tool implementations that register themselves with the MCP protocol, accept tool invocation requests from clients, and return results in the correct format. The combined server demonstrates multiple tools with different signatures and return types, allowing clients to validate tool discovery, parameter validation, and result handling against a known-good implementation.
Unique: Bundles multiple tool implementations with varying complexity and parameter types in a single server, enabling comprehensive testing of tool calling patterns without building custom tools
vs alternatives: More complete than simple echo tools because it includes tools with different signatures and return types, providing better coverage of real-world tool calling scenarios
The env-echo server reads environment variables from the host process and exposes them through the MCP protocol, allowing clients to retrieve environment configuration without direct system access. This demonstrates how MCP servers can bridge between system state and protocol clients, useful for testing clients that need to access host configuration or validate environment-aware behavior.
Unique: Bridges system environment state into the MCP protocol layer, demonstrating how servers can expose host configuration as a first-class MCP capability rather than hardcoding values
vs alternatives: More realistic than mock servers because it uses actual environment variables, enabling testing of environment-aware client behavior in different deployment contexts
Implements a minimal MCP server that responds to ping requests with pong responses, providing the simplest possible working MCP server implementation. This server validates basic protocol compliance, connection establishment, and message round-trip functionality without any complex features, serving as a baseline for testing MCP client connectivity and protocol parsing.
Unique: Provides the absolute minimal MCP server implementation, useful as a reference for understanding the core protocol without distraction from feature implementations
vs alternatives: Simpler and faster to test against than full-featured servers, making it ideal for isolating connection and protocol parsing issues
Bundles multiple MCP capabilities (tools, resources, and other features) into a single server instance, allowing clients to test interactions between different capability types and validate that the client correctly handles servers with mixed feature sets. This server demonstrates how real-world MCP servers typically expose multiple capabilities simultaneously.
Unique: Combines multiple MCP capabilities in a single server instance, providing a more realistic testing environment than single-capability servers while remaining simple enough to understand
vs alternatives: More representative of real-world MCP servers than single-capability test servers, enabling better validation of client behavior in production scenarios
Crawls 11+ heterogeneous platforms (Zhihu, Weibo, Bilibili, Twitter, Reddit, HackerNews, etc.) and RSS feeds using platform-specific scrapers, normalizes disparate data schemas into a unified NewsItem model, and deduplicates content across sources using fuzzy title matching and URL canonicalization. The system maintains platform-specific metadata (rank, heat value, engagement metrics) while presenting a single normalized feed, enabling cross-platform trend detection that would be invisible within individual platform silos.
Unique: Implements platform-specific crawler modules with unified NewsItem schema and fuzzy deduplication across 11+ heterogeneous sources (Chinese + international), rather than relying on single-platform APIs or generic RSS parsing. Maintains platform-specific metadata (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) for weighted hotspot scoring.
vs alternatives: Covers more platforms (especially Chinese social media) with deeper metadata extraction than generic RSS aggregators, and provides unified deduplication across sources unlike single-platform monitoring tools.
Implements a multi-stage filtering pipeline that matches news items against user-defined keywords using regex patterns, required word lists, and excluded word lists. The system applies frequency-based scoring (keyword occurrence count) combined with platform hotspot weights to rank filtered results. Configuration is stored in frequency_words.txt with support for regex patterns, AND/OR/NOT boolean operators, and per-keyword weighting. Filtering occurs at collection time (reducing storage) and again at report generation time (enabling dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling).
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching with frequency-based scoring and platform hotspot weighting (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) in a two-stage pipeline (collection-time and report-time filtering). Supports dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling by applying filters at report generation.
TrendRadar scores higher at 58/100 vs @msfeldstein/mcp-test-servers at 25/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple keyword matching (supports regex and boolean logic) and more efficient than semantic filtering (no LLM overhead), making it suitable for real-time filtering at scale.
Detects newly emerged topics by comparing current crawl results against historical data stored in the system. Topics are marked as 🆕 (new) if they appear for the first time in the current crawl or if their hotspot rank increased significantly compared to previous crawls. The system tracks topic emergence velocity (how quickly a topic rises in rankings) and flags topics with unusual acceleration. New topic detection is performed at report generation time, enabling dynamic detection without re-crawling. The system maintains a historical hotspot index for comparison.
Unique: Detects new topics by comparing current hotspot rankings against historical data, marking topics with significant rank increases as 🆕. Tracks emergence velocity to distinguish breaking news from sustained trends.
vs alternatives: More efficient than semantic similarity detection (no LLM overhead) and more accurate than simple first-appearance detection (accounts for re-emerging topics), but requires historical baseline data.
Provides a web-based UI for editing TrendRadar configuration files (config.yaml, frequency_words.txt, timeline.yaml) with real-time validation and preview. The editor supports: (1) syntax highlighting for YAML and regex, (2) validation of keyword patterns (regex compilation check), (3) preview of filtered results based on current keyword configuration, (4) drag-and-drop channel configuration, (5) schedule preview (shows next 10 execution times). Changes are validated before saving, preventing configuration errors. The editor is optional; users can edit config files directly.
Unique: Provides web-based configuration editor with real-time validation, regex preview, and schedule visualization. Enables non-technical users to configure TrendRadar without editing YAML files.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual YAML editing and provides validation feedback, but adds operational complexity compared to file-based configuration.
Integrates LiteLLM to provide vendor-agnostic AI analysis and summarization of filtered news items. Users configure their preferred LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models, etc.) once in config.yaml, and the system automatically routes analysis requests to that provider. The AI analysis capability includes: (1) automated summarization of long articles into key points, (2) sentiment analysis (positive/negative/neutral), (3) trend prediction based on historical patterns, and (4) custom analysis prompts. Analysis results are cached to avoid redundant API calls and can be pushed directly to notification channels.
Unique: Uses LiteLLM abstraction layer to support any LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models) with single configuration, enabling provider switching without code changes. Caches analysis results to reduce redundant API calls and costs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded OpenAI integration (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than dedicated sentiment analysis APIs (can use local models), but slower than rule-based sentiment analysis.
Leverages LiteLLM to translate news content from source languages (primarily Chinese) to target languages (English, etc.) on-demand. The system detects source language automatically (via langdetect or similar), caches translations to avoid re-translating identical content, and batches translation requests to reduce API calls. Translations are stored alongside original content, enabling bilingual reports and multi-language notification delivery. Translation can be triggered at collection time (all news) or report time (only filtered news).
Unique: Implements provider-agnostic translation via LiteLLM with automatic language detection, content-based caching, and batch request optimization. Stores translations alongside originals for bilingual report generation.
vs alternatives: More flexible than dedicated translation APIs (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than commercial translation services when using local models, but slower than specialized translation APIs.
Implements a notification abstraction layer supporting 9+ delivery channels (WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc.). Each channel has a provider-specific formatter that converts normalized news items into channel-appropriate messages (e.g., WeChat card format, Telegram markdown, email HTML). The system batches notifications atomically—all news items for a report are sent as a single batch to each channel, ensuring consistency and reducing API calls. Message formatting respects channel constraints (character limits, attachment limits, etc.) and supports templating for customization.
Unique: Implements atomic message batching across 9+ heterogeneous channels with provider-specific formatters and constraint-aware truncation. Single configuration enables simultaneous delivery to WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc. without code changes.
vs alternatives: Supports more channels (especially Chinese platforms like WeWork, Feishu) than generic notification services, and batching reduces API calls and spam compared to per-item notifications.
Exposes TrendRadar's data and analysis capabilities as an MCP server, enabling AI agents and LLM applications to query trends, perform analysis, and generate insights through natural language. The MCP server implements tools for: (1) querying filtered news by keyword/date/platform, (2) retrieving trend statistics and hotspot rankings, (3) running custom analysis on news subsets, (4) generating reports in various formats. Clients (Claude, other LLM agents) can invoke these tools via MCP protocol, enabling conversational exploration of trends without direct database access. The server maintains state across multiple requests, allowing multi-turn conversations about trends.
Unique: Implements full MCP server exposing trend data and analysis tools to LLM agents, enabling conversational queries and multi-turn analysis workflows. Maintains state across requests and supports complex tool invocations (filtering, analysis, report generation).
vs alternatives: Enables conversational access to trends (vs. API-only access) and integrates with LLM agent workflows (vs. standalone tools), but adds operational complexity compared to simple REST APIs.
+4 more capabilities