| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements RFC 7231 HTTP 402 Payment Required status code enforcement as Express middleware, intercepting requests to MCP tool servers and validating payment credentials before allowing tool execution. Uses OWS CLI integration to verify payment state and enforce monetization policies at the HTTP layer, blocking unpaid requests with 402 responses and payment metadata.
Unique: Native HTTP 402 enforcement at the MCP server boundary using OWS CLI integration, enabling payment gates without modifying individual tool implementations or requiring custom authentication schemes
vs alternatives: Directly implements RFC 7231 HTTP 402 standard for payment enforcement rather than layering payments on top of OAuth/JWT, making it natively compatible with HTTP-aware clients and proxies
Integrates USDC stablecoin payments on the Base blockchain through OWS CLI, enabling tool servers to accept and validate on-chain payments without directly managing wallet keys or smart contracts. Abstracts blockchain interaction complexity by delegating to OWS CLI's payment verification and settlement logic.
Unique: Abstracts Base chain USDC payments through OWS CLI, eliminating need for direct ethers.js/web3.js integration or smart contract deployment while maintaining on-chain settlement guarantees
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom smart contracts or using general payment processors because it's purpose-built for MCP monetization and handles blockchain complexity via CLI abstraction
Provides a Node.js wrapper around OWS CLI commands for payment validation, executing CLI subcommands to check payment status, retrieve payment metadata, and enforce monetization policies. Uses child_process spawning to invoke OWS CLI with structured arguments and parses JSON responses for payment state verification.
Unique: Wraps OWS CLI as a Node.js integration layer, allowing MCP servers to leverage OWS payment infrastructure without requiring direct SDK dependencies or blockchain libraries
vs alternatives: Lighter-weight than full SDK integration because it delegates all payment logic to OWS CLI, reducing bundle size and dependency surface area
Exports a middleware factory function that creates Express middleware instances configured with specific payment requirements (amount, currency, recipient). Middleware intercepts requests, validates payment state via OWS CLI, and either forwards requests to downstream tools or returns 402 responses with payment instructions.
Unique: Factory pattern middleware that creates configured payment gates for Express, allowing per-route payment policies without monolithic middleware configuration
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded payment checks because it's a reusable middleware factory, enabling different payment amounts for different tool endpoints
Parses OWS CLI responses and formats payment metadata (transaction hash, amount, timestamp, payer address) into HTTP response headers and JSON bodies for 402 Payment Required responses. Structures payment instructions in a standardized format that clients can use to complete payment and retry requests.
Unique: Standardizes payment metadata extraction from OWS CLI into HTTP 402 response format, enabling interoperability between MCP servers and payment-aware clients
vs alternatives: Provides structured payment instructions in HTTP responses rather than opaque error messages, making it easier for clients to understand and complete payment flows
Enforces configurable monetization policies at the MCP server level, including minimum payment amounts, payment recipient addresses, and currency requirements. Policies are applied per-middleware instance and validated against incoming requests before tool execution is allowed.
Unique: Applies monetization policies at the HTTP middleware layer, enforcing payment requirements before requests reach MCP tool logic, enabling transparent payment gates
vs alternatives: Cleaner separation of concerns than embedding payment logic in tool code because policies are enforced at the server boundary
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs @nikhilraikwar/mcpay at 23/100. @nikhilraikwar/mcpay leads on ecosystem, while Supabase is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities