| 0 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) as a transport layer to relay Slack messages and events into Claude or other LLM clients. Uses MCP's resource and tool abstractions to expose Slack API operations (send, read, list messages) as standardized LLM-callable functions, enabling bidirectional Slack integration without direct API key exposure to the LLM.
Unique: Uses MCP as the integration protocol rather than direct Slack SDK wrapping, allowing the LLM to invoke Slack operations through standardized MCP resource/tool schemas. This decouples the LLM from Slack API authentication and enables multi-client support (Claude, Anthropic SDK, custom LLM agents).
vs alternatives: Cleaner than custom Slack API wrappers because MCP standardizes the interface; more secure than embedding Slack tokens in LLM prompts because credentials stay in the MCP server process.
Exposes a command-line interface for sending messages to Slack channels and retrieving message history without requiring LLM integration. Uses Node.js child process execution to invoke Slack API calls, supporting both synchronous message sends and asynchronous channel history queries with optional filtering by timestamp or user.
Unique: Provides a thin CLI wrapper around Slack API operations, making Slack integration accessible from shell scripts and CI/CD without requiring Node.js application code. Uses environment variables for credential management, following Unix conventions.
vs alternatives: Simpler than curl-based Slack API calls because it handles authentication and JSON serialization; more portable than bash-only solutions because it's cross-platform (Windows, macOS, Linux).
Exports a typed TypeScript/JavaScript API for Slack operations (send message, list channels, get message history, post reactions) with full type definitions and async/await support. Wraps the Slack Web API client with convenience methods that handle pagination, error handling, and response normalization, enabling type-safe Slack integration in Node.js applications.
Unique: Provides a thin, type-safe wrapper over @slack/web-api with convenience methods for common operations, avoiding boilerplate while maintaining full TypeScript type safety. Designed for composition with other async operations in Node.js workflows.
vs alternatives: More type-safe than raw Slack API calls; less opinionated than full-featured bot frameworks (Bolt, Hubot), making it suitable for embedding in existing applications.
Registers slack-relay-mcp as a Claude Code skill, allowing Claude's code interpreter to invoke Slack operations directly during code execution. When Claude writes or executes code, it can call Slack functions to send messages, read channels, or retrieve history as part of a multi-step reasoning workflow, with results fed back into Claude's context for further analysis.
Unique: Bridges Claude's code execution environment with Slack by registering as a Code skill, allowing Claude to invoke Slack operations as part of its reasoning loop. This enables Claude to read Slack context, analyze it, and take actions without explicit user prompting for each step.
vs alternatives: More integrated than manual Claude + Slack API calls because Claude can reason about Slack data and take actions autonomously; more flexible than pre-built Slack bots because Claude can adapt its behavior based on message content.
Exposes Slack channels and messages as MCP resources (read-only or read-write), allowing LLM clients to browse and reference Slack data through the MCP resource protocol. Resources are identified by URIs (e.g., slack://channel/C123456) and return structured JSON representations of channels, message threads, and user metadata, enabling LLMs to understand Slack context without making direct API calls.
Unique: Uses MCP's resource protocol to expose Slack data as browsable, structured resources rather than tool-callable functions. This allows LLMs to understand Slack context through resource references, reducing the need for explicit tool calls and enabling more natural context integration.
vs alternatives: More efficient than tool-based message retrieval because resources can be cached and referenced by URI; more structured than embedding raw Slack JSON in prompts because resources enforce schema consistency.
Defines MCP tool schemas for Slack operations (send_message, get_channel_history, list_channels, add_reaction) that LLM clients can invoke through the MCP function-calling protocol. Each tool includes input validation schemas, error handling, and response normalization, allowing LLMs to call Slack operations with type-safe arguments and receive structured results.
Unique: Implements MCP tool schemas for Slack operations, enabling LLMs to invoke Slack actions through standardized function-calling interfaces. Schemas include input validation and error handling, reducing the burden on the LLM to construct valid Slack API calls.
vs alternatives: More standardized than custom tool definitions because it uses MCP's schema format; more flexible than hard-coded tool lists because schemas can be extended with custom operations.
Handles Slack bot token authentication through environment variables or configuration files, managing credentials securely without exposing them to LLM contexts. Uses the @slack/web-api client under the hood to authenticate with Slack's OAuth 2.0 flow, supporting token rotation and scope validation to ensure the bot has required permissions.
Unique: Isolates Slack credentials in the MCP server process, preventing token exposure to LLM contexts. Uses environment-based configuration following Unix security conventions, enabling credential management through standard deployment tools (Docker secrets, Kubernetes ConfigMaps).
vs alternatives: More secure than embedding tokens in prompts or passing them through LLM context; more flexible than hard-coded tokens because it supports environment-based configuration and rotation.
Implements cursor-based pagination for Slack message history retrieval, allowing efficient querying of large channels without loading all messages into memory. Supports filtering by timestamp range, user ID, or message type, with automatic cursor management and result normalization to handle Slack API's pagination format.
Unique: Abstracts Slack's cursor-based pagination into a simple iterator interface, handling cursor management and result normalization transparently. Supports optional filtering by timestamp and user, reducing the need for post-processing.
vs alternatives: More efficient than fetching all messages at once because it uses pagination; more flexible than fixed-size queries because it supports arbitrary filtering and cursor-based traversal.
+2 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs slack-relay-mcp at 28/100. slack-relay-mcp leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities