| 0 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) as a server that translates MCP client requests into TouchDesigner network commands, enabling LLM agents and tools to communicate with TouchDesigner instances over the network. Uses MCP's standardized resource and tool schemas to expose TouchDesigner capabilities as callable functions, with request/response serialization handling the protocol translation layer between MCP clients and TouchDesigner's native network API.
Unique: Bridges MCP (a standardized LLM tool protocol) directly to TouchDesigner's network API, allowing any MCP client to control TouchDesigner without custom integration code. Uses MCP's resource and tool schemas to abstract TouchDesigner's command structure into callable functions.
vs alternatives: Provides standardized MCP interface to TouchDesigner instead of requiring custom WebSocket or OSC implementations, making it compatible with any MCP-aware LLM client (Claude, custom agents) out of the box
Exposes TouchDesigner parameters, operators, and available commands as MCP resources with JSON schema definitions, allowing MCP clients to discover what can be controlled and what data types are expected. Implements MCP's resource listing and schema introspection endpoints so clients can query available operations before making calls, enabling intelligent prompt generation and parameter validation.
Unique: Implements MCP's resource and schema endpoints to provide full introspection of TouchDesigner's controllable surface, enabling clients to discover and validate operations dynamically rather than relying on hardcoded knowledge.
vs alternatives: Provides machine-readable schema discovery unlike REST APIs that require manual documentation reading, allowing LLM agents to understand available operations without prompt engineering
Handles reading and writing TouchDesigner parameters through the network protocol with automatic type conversion between MCP's JSON types and TouchDesigner's native types (float, int, string, bool, vector). Implements validation logic to ensure values conform to parameter constraints (min/max ranges, enum values) before sending to TouchDesigner, with error handling for type mismatches and out-of-range values.
Unique: Implements bidirectional parameter synchronization with automatic type coercion and constraint validation, ensuring type safety between JSON-based MCP protocol and TouchDesigner's strongly-typed parameter system.
vs alternatives: Handles type conversion and validation transparently, unlike raw network APIs that require manual type handling and constraint checking in client code
Enables calling TouchDesigner operators (CHOP, SOP, TOP, DAT) as MCP tools, with support for passing inputs and retrieving outputs. Implements operator invocation through TouchDesigner's network protocol, handling asynchronous execution and state polling to retrieve results. Supports querying operator state (enabled/disabled, current output values) to enable agents to understand the current scene state.
Unique: Wraps TouchDesigner operator execution as MCP tools with asynchronous result retrieval, allowing agents to trigger complex computations and query results without blocking, enabling sophisticated automation workflows.
vs alternatives: Provides operator-level abstraction over raw network commands, enabling agents to work with TouchDesigner's computational graph directly rather than managing low-level parameter changes
Groups multiple parameter changes or operator calls into a single network transaction, reducing round-trip latency and ensuring atomic updates. Implements command buffering and batch sending through TouchDesigner's network protocol, with rollback support if any command in the batch fails. Enables agents to perform coordinated multi-step updates (e.g., change position, rotation, and scale simultaneously) with guaranteed consistency.
Unique: Implements transaction-style batching for TouchDesigner network commands, providing atomic multi-command updates with rollback semantics, unlike individual parameter writes that may leave intermediate inconsistent states.
vs alternatives: Reduces latency and improves reliability for coordinated updates compared to sequential individual commands, critical for real-time control scenarios
Implements retry logic, connection pooling, and graceful degradation for network failures between MCP server and TouchDesigner. Detects connection loss, automatically attempts reconnection with exponential backoff, and queues commands during disconnection for replay when connection restores. Provides detailed error messages distinguishing between network errors, TouchDesigner errors, and validation errors to enable intelligent error recovery in agents.
Unique: Implements connection pooling with automatic reconnection and command queuing for transient failures, providing resilience for network-based control that simple request/response patterns don't offer.
vs alternatives: Survives temporary network interruptions and provides intelligent retry semantics, unlike stateless REST APIs that fail immediately on connection loss
Records all MCP tool calls, parameter changes, and operator executions with timestamps and execution results, enabling audit trails and debugging. Implements structured logging with configurable verbosity levels and optional integration with external logging systems (e.g., JSON logging to files or services). Provides execution traces showing command sequence, timing, and results to help agents understand what happened and diagnose failures.
Unique: Provides structured execution logging with timing and result tracking for all MCP operations, enabling full audit trails and debugging of agent-TouchDesigner interactions.
vs alternatives: Offers visibility into agent behavior and TouchDesigner state changes that would otherwise be invisible, critical for debugging and compliance
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 70/100 vs touchdesigner-mcp-server at 21/100. touchdesigner-mcp-server leads on ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities