| 0 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates inline ghost-text code suggestions as the user types by reading the current file's content and cursor position, then querying a locally-running Ollama inference engine with configurable debounce delay (default 300ms) to prevent excessive inference calls. The extension integrates with VS Code's IntelliSense system to display suggestions that can be accepted via Tab or dismissed via Esc, with generation parameters (temperature, max tokens) tunable via settings.
Unique: Implements debounce-gated local inference with per-model configuration (separate models for autocomplete vs chat) and explicit temperature/token tuning, avoiding cloud API calls entirely by binding directly to Ollama's HTTP API on localhost. Unlike cloud-based copilots, it provides zero-latency model switching and full control over inference parameters without rate limiting.
vs alternatives: Faster than GitHub Copilot for privacy-conscious teams because all inference runs locally with no network round-trip, and cheaper than Codeium for heavy users because it uses free open-source models instead of subscription-based cloud inference.
Provides an interactive chat sidebar panel (accessed via Ollama icon in activity bar or 'Ollama: Open Chat' command) that accepts natural language questions about code and returns explanations or problem-solving responses by sending the current file's content plus user query to a locally-running Ollama model. Conversation history is maintained in memory during the VS Code session but is not persisted across restarts, and the chat model is independently configurable from the autocomplete model via the 'ollama-copilot.chatModel' setting.
Unique: Decouples chat model from autocomplete model via separate 'ollama-copilot.chatModel' setting, enabling users to run a smaller model (e.g., 7B CodeLlama) for fast autocomplete while using a larger model (e.g., 70B Phind-CodeLlama) for higher-quality chat responses. Integrates chat directly into VS Code sidebar rather than requiring external browser window or separate application.
vs alternatives: More flexible than GitHub Copilot Chat because it allows independent model selection for different tasks, and more private than cloud-based alternatives because all conversation data remains local and is never transmitted externally.
Allows users to independently select and switch between any Ollama-compatible model for autocomplete (via 'ollama-copilot.model' setting) and chat (via 'ollama-copilot.chatModel' setting) through VS Code's Settings UI, with no API keys or authentication required. Models must be pre-installed locally via 'ollama pull <model>', and the extension dynamically queries the configured Ollama instance at runtime without requiring extension restart, enabling experimentation with different model sizes and architectures (CodeLlama, DeepSeek Coder, StarCoder2, Phind-CodeLlama, etc.).
Unique: Implements independent model selection for autocomplete vs chat tasks, allowing asymmetric model pairing (e.g., 7B model for fast autocomplete + 70B model for high-quality chat). No vendor lock-in or API key management — any Ollama-compatible model can be used immediately after local installation.
vs alternatives: More flexible than GitHub Copilot (single fixed model) and Codeium (vendor-controlled model selection) because users have full control over which models run locally and can switch between them without API reconfiguration or subscription changes.
Exposes inference generation parameters via VS Code settings to control output quality and latency: 'ollama-copilot.temperature' (default 0.2, controls randomness/creativity), 'ollama-copilot.maxTokens' (default 100, limits response length), and 'ollama-copilot.debounceMs' (default 300, delays autocomplete trigger). These settings apply globally to both autocomplete and chat, allowing users to optimize for their hardware constraints and use-case preferences without modifying extension code.
Unique: Exposes low-level inference parameters (temperature, max tokens, debounce) directly to users via VS Code settings without requiring extension code modification, enabling rapid experimentation and hardware-specific optimization. Debounce mechanism is unique to this extension and prevents excessive inference calls during rapid typing.
vs alternatives: More configurable than GitHub Copilot (fixed parameters) and Codeium (limited tuning options) because users have direct control over generation behavior and can optimize for their specific hardware and use-case without API-level constraints.
Integrates with Ollama's HTTP API by making requests to a configurable baseUrl (default http://localhost:11434) to perform inference, with no authentication or API key required. The extension reads the 'ollama-copilot.baseUrl' setting to determine the Ollama endpoint, allowing users to point to local instances, remote Ollama servers on the same network, or custom Ollama-compatible inference servers. All requests are made over HTTP (no TLS/encryption documented), and the extension fails silently if the endpoint is unreachable.
Unique: Directly integrates with Ollama's HTTP API without abstraction layers, allowing users to point to any Ollama-compatible endpoint (local, remote, or custom) via a single configuration setting. No vendor-specific SDK or authentication required — pure HTTP-based integration.
vs alternatives: More flexible than cloud-based copilots because it can connect to any Ollama instance (local or remote) without API key management, and more portable than GitHub Copilot because it works with custom inference infrastructure and doesn't require cloud connectivity.
Provides a boolean 'ollama-copilot.autocompleteEnabled' setting (default true) that allows users to completely disable inline code suggestions without uninstalling the extension or removing the chat functionality. When disabled, the extension stops listening for typing events and generating autocomplete suggestions, but the chat sidebar remains fully functional. This enables users to use chat-only mode or temporarily pause autocomplete without losing other extension features.
Unique: Provides simple boolean toggle for autocomplete without affecting chat functionality, allowing asymmetric feature usage (chat-only mode). No other copilot extension offers this level of granular control.
vs alternatives: More flexible than GitHub Copilot (all-or-nothing) because users can disable autocomplete while keeping chat, and simpler than Codeium (which requires API-level configuration) because it's a single boolean setting.
Exposes two contributed VS Code commands accessible via the Command Palette (Ctrl+Shift+P / Cmd+Shift+P): 'Ollama: Open Chat' (opens the chat sidebar panel) and 'Ollama: Toggle Autocomplete' (enables/disables autocomplete). These commands provide keyboard-driven access to core features without requiring mouse interaction with the activity bar or settings UI, enabling power users to integrate Ollama features into custom keybindings or macros.
Unique: Exposes core features via VS Code Command Palette commands, enabling keyboard-driven access and integration with custom keybindings or automation workflows. Allows users to define custom shortcuts without modifying extension code.
vs alternatives: More accessible than GitHub Copilot (limited command palette integration) because it provides keyboard-driven access to all major features and enables custom keybinding configuration.
Provides a dedicated chat interface in the VS Code activity bar sidebar (accessed via Ollama icon) that persists across editor tabs and file switches, maintaining conversation history during the session. The sidebar panel displays chat messages in a scrollable list with user queries and assistant responses, includes a text input field for new messages, and a Send button (or Enter key submission). The panel remains open until explicitly closed, allowing users to reference previous messages while editing code.
Unique: Integrates chat as a persistent sidebar panel in VS Code's activity bar, keeping conversation history visible while editing code. Unlike external chat tools or browser windows, the sidebar maintains context without requiring window switching.
vs alternatives: More integrated than GitHub Copilot Chat (which opens in a separate panel) and more persistent than browser-based chat tools because it maintains conversation history throughout the VS Code session and doesn't require external applications.
+1 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs Ollama Copilot VS Code at 32/100. Ollama Copilot VS Code leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities