| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
OpenMetadata implements a centralized metadata store using a typed entity model (databases, tables, columns, dashboards, pipelines, etc.) persisted in PostgreSQL/MySQL with REST API access. The Entity Management and Repository Layer provides CRUD operations on metadata entities with version control, lineage tracking, and relationship management through a schema-driven approach that enforces consistency across all ingested metadata sources.
Unique: Uses a strongly-typed entity model with built-in relationship tracking and version control, enabling column-level lineage and cross-asset impact analysis — unlike generic metadata stores that treat all entities uniformly
vs alternatives: Provides deeper structural understanding of data assets than document-based catalogs (Alation, Collibra) through explicit entity relationships and schema enforcement, enabling programmatic lineage traversal
OpenMetadata tracks data lineage at column granularity by parsing SQL queries, ETL job definitions, and pipeline DAGs to build a directed acyclic graph (DAG) of data transformations. The Lineage and Domain Management system stores lineage edges in the metadata repository and exposes them via REST APIs and UI visualizations, enabling users to trace data provenance from source to sink and identify downstream impact of schema changes.
Unique: Implements column-level (not table-level) lineage tracking with explicit edge storage in the metadata repository, enabling precise impact analysis and data quality root-cause tracing — most competitors only track table-level lineage
vs alternatives: Provides finer-grained lineage than Collibra or Alation (which typically stop at table level), enabling data engineers to identify exactly which source columns caused downstream data quality issues
OpenMetadata provides Kubernetes Operator and Helm charts for cloud-native deployment, enabling declarative infrastructure-as-code management of OpenMetadata instances. The deployment architecture supports horizontal scaling of the OpenMetadata service (stateless), with external PostgreSQL/MySQL and Elasticsearch/OpenSearch backends. The Kubernetes Operator automates upgrades, configuration management, and backup/restore operations, enabling GitOps-based deployment workflows.
Unique: Provides Kubernetes Operator for declarative, GitOps-friendly deployment with automated lifecycle management — enabling OpenMetadata to be managed as infrastructure-as-code alongside other Kubernetes workloads
vs alternatives: More cloud-native than traditional VM-based deployments; enables GitOps workflows and horizontal scaling that competitors (Collibra, Alation) typically require manual infrastructure management
OpenMetadata's Data Profiler computes statistical profiles for tables and columns (null counts, cardinality, min/max values, distribution histograms, correlation analysis) by executing SQL queries against source systems. Profiles are stored as metadata and tracked over time, enabling trend analysis and detection of statistical anomalies (e.g., sudden increase in null values, unexpected cardinality changes). The profiler integrates with data quality tests to provide context for quality issues.
Unique: Integrates statistical profiling directly into the metadata catalog with historical tracking and anomaly detection, enabling data quality baselines to be understood and monitored as part of metadata management
vs alternatives: Simpler than dedicated profiling tools (Great Expectations) but integrated with lineage and ownership; sufficient for teams wanting profiling as a metadata feature rather than standalone platform
OpenMetadata's Metadata Ingestion Framework provides a plugin-based architecture for extracting metadata from diverse sources (databases, data warehouses, BI tools, data lakes, orchestration platforms). Each connector implements a standardized interface to extract entities, relationships, and lineage, transform them into OpenMetadata's entity model, and load them into the central repository. The framework supports both batch ingestion (scheduled jobs) and event-driven ingestion via Airflow, Kafka, or direct API calls.
Unique: Implements a standardized connector interface with 100+ pre-built connectors covering databases, data warehouses, BI tools, and orchestration platforms, with a plugin architecture allowing custom connector development — enabling single-platform metadata aggregation
vs alternatives: Broader connector coverage than Collibra or Alation out-of-the-box, with open-source connectors that can be customized; competitors often require separate licensing for each connector
OpenMetadata's Data Profiler and Quality Validations system automatically computes statistical profiles (null counts, cardinality, distribution, min/max values) for tables and columns on a schedule, and executes user-defined data quality tests (e.g., 'column X should have <5% nulls', 'column Y values must match regex pattern'). Test results are stored as metadata entities linked to tables, enabling trend analysis and alerting on quality degradation. The system integrates with dbt tests, Great Expectations, and custom SQL validators.
Unique: Integrates data profiling and quality testing directly into the metadata catalog, enabling quality metrics to be linked to lineage and ownership — allowing data teams to correlate quality issues with upstream changes and responsible teams
vs alternatives: Lighter-weight than dedicated tools (Great Expectations) with lower operational overhead, but less flexible; best for teams wanting quality monitoring as a metadata catalog feature rather than a standalone platform
OpenMetadata indexes all metadata entities (tables, columns, dashboards, pipelines, glossary terms) into Elasticsearch or OpenSearch, enabling full-text search with relevance ranking and faceted filtering by entity type, owner, domain, tags, and custom attributes. The Search and Indexing system uses BM25 scoring for relevance and supports advanced queries (wildcards, boolean operators, field-specific searches). Search results are ranked by relevance and enriched with lineage, ownership, and quality metadata.
Unique: Implements full-text search with faceted filtering and relevance ranking specifically for metadata entities, with integration of lineage and ownership context in search results — enabling discovery that goes beyond keyword matching
vs alternatives: More discoverable than REST API-based catalogs (Collibra) due to full-text search and faceting; less sophisticated than ML-based recommendation systems but lower operational complexity
OpenMetadata implements fine-grained RBAC through the Authentication and Authorization system, supporting multiple auth providers (OAuth2, SAML, LDAP, custom) and role definitions (Admin, DataSteward, DataConsumer, etc.). Access control is enforced at entity level (who can view/edit specific tables, columns, dashboards) and operation level (who can approve data quality tests, manage glossaries). The system integrates with governance workflows (approval chains, ownership assignment, domain management) to enforce data stewardship policies.
Unique: Implements metadata-level RBAC with approval workflows and audit logging, enabling data governance policies to be enforced within the catalog itself — rather than relying on external systems for access control
vs alternatives: More integrated governance than generic metadata stores; less sophisticated than dedicated data governance platforms (Collibra) but sufficient for teams building internal governance frameworks
+4 more capabilities
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 70/100 vs OpenMetadata at 40/100. OpenMetadata leads on ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities