| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 14 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
OpenAgents implements a service-oriented architecture that routes user requests to one of three specialized agent types (Data, Plugins, Web) based on task intent. The backend Flask server maintains a unified message flow interface while each agent type implements its own execution logic, with shared adapters handling stream parsing, memory callbacks, and data models. This modular design allows agents to be independently deployed and scaled while maintaining a consistent interface for the frontend.
Unique: Uses a 'one agent, one folder' design principle with shared adapters (stream parsing, memory, callbacks) that allow specialized agents to inherit common infrastructure while maintaining independent execution logic — different from monolithic agent frameworks that embed all capabilities in a single agent class
vs alternatives: Cleaner separation of concerns than LangChain's single-agent paradigm, with explicit multi-agent support built into the architecture rather than bolted on via tool composition
The Data Agent provides a specialized toolkit for data manipulation, analysis, and visualization by executing Python and SQL code in a sandboxed environment. It integrates with the backend's memory system to maintain context across multiple data operations, supports file uploads (CSV, JSON, images), and generates visualizations through matplotlib/plotly. The agent uses LLM-guided code generation to translate natural language data requests into executable Python/SQL, with streaming output to provide real-time feedback during long-running computations.
Unique: Combines LLM-guided code generation with streaming execution feedback and integrated visualization — the agent generates executable Python/SQL from natural language, executes it in a controlled environment, and streams results back, creating a tight feedback loop unlike static code generation tools
vs alternatives: More integrated than Jupyter notebooks (no manual cell management) and more flexible than no-code BI tools (full Python/SQL power), with real-time streaming output that traditional batch-oriented data tools lack
OpenAgents maintains a registry of 200+ plugins with structured metadata (name, description, parameters, authentication requirements, category). Plugins are registered with JSON schemas describing their inputs/outputs, enabling the LLM to understand plugin capabilities and select appropriate plugins based on user intent. The registry supports plugin discovery, parameter validation, and authentication management, allowing new plugins to be added without modifying agent code.
Unique: Implements a metadata-driven plugin registry where plugins are described with JSON schemas and natural language descriptions, enabling LLM-based discovery and selection rather than explicit user specification — the system reasons about plugin relevance based on metadata
vs alternatives: More scalable than hardcoded plugin lists and more automatic than manual plugin selection, though with less predictability than explicit tool specification
The Data Agent generates executable Python and SQL code from natural language requests using the LLM, then executes the code in a sandboxed environment with access to uploaded data. The sandbox provides a controlled execution context with access to common data libraries (pandas, numpy, matplotlib, plotly) while isolating dangerous operations. Generated code is logged and can be reviewed before execution, providing transparency into what the agent is doing.
Unique: Generates executable Python/SQL code from natural language, executes it in a sandbox with data library access, and logs generated code for transparency — creating a code-generation-and-execution pipeline that's more transparent than black-box data analysis tools
vs alternatives: More transparent than no-code BI tools (users see generated code) and more automated than manual coding, though with execution safety tradeoffs compared to static analysis tools
The Web Agent integrates vision-language models (GPT-4V, Claude Vision) to interpret screenshots of web pages and understand their visual layout, content, and interactive elements. The agent captures screenshots during browsing, sends them to the vision model with a task description, and receives natural language descriptions of page content and recommended actions. This enables the agent to interact with websites without relying on DOM parsing or explicit selectors, making it adaptable to varied website designs.
Unique: Uses vision-language models to interpret web page screenshots and understand visual layout/content, enabling interaction with dynamic websites without DOM parsing — the agent reasons about page structure from visual input rather than HTML structure
vs alternatives: More adaptable to varied website designs than DOM-based approaches (Selenium, Puppeteer) but slower and more expensive due to vision model API calls per action
OpenAgents maintains a conversation history within each session that includes user messages, agent responses, and file references. The system allows agents to access previous messages and uploaded files throughout a conversation, enabling multi-turn interactions where agents build on prior context. File uploads are stored with metadata (filename, upload time, size) and can be referenced in subsequent requests without re-uploading, improving user experience for iterative analysis.
Unique: Maintains session-scoped conversation history with file references, allowing agents to access previous messages and uploaded files without re-uploading — creates a stateful conversation model where context accumulates across turns
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than stateless APIs (no need to re-upload files) and more integrated than manual context passing, though limited to session scope rather than persistent cross-session memory
The Plugins Agent provides access to 200+ third-party APIs (shopping, weather, scientific tools, etc.) through a unified plugin registry system. The agent uses LLM-based reasoning to automatically select relevant plugins based on user intent, constructs appropriate API calls with parameter binding, and handles response parsing/formatting. Plugins are registered with metadata (description, parameters, authentication requirements) that the LLM uses for selection, enabling the agent to discover and invoke APIs without explicit user specification.
Unique: Implements automatic plugin selection via LLM reasoning over plugin metadata registry rather than explicit user specification — the agent reads plugin descriptions and parameters, reasons about relevance, and invokes APIs autonomously, creating a discovery-based integration model
vs alternatives: Broader integration coverage than single-purpose tools (200+ plugins vs. 10-20 in typical assistants) and more automatic than manual API composition, though at the cost of less predictable behavior than explicit tool selection
The Web Agent enables autonomous web browsing through a Chrome extension that allows the agent to navigate websites, extract information, and interact with web pages (clicking, form filling, scrolling). The agent receives visual feedback (screenshots) from the browser, uses vision-language models to understand page content, and generates browser commands (navigate, click, extract text) to accomplish user goals. This creates a closed-loop system where the agent observes page state, reasons about next actions, and executes them iteratively until the task completes.
Unique: Uses a vision-language model feedback loop where the agent observes screenshots, reasons about page content and next actions, and executes browser commands iteratively — different from traditional web scraping tools that rely on DOM parsing or explicit selectors, enabling interaction with dynamic/JavaScript-heavy sites
vs alternatives: More flexible than Selenium/Puppeteer (handles dynamic content and visual understanding) but slower and less reliable than DOM-based scraping, trading precision for adaptability to varied website structures
+6 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs OpenAgents at 22/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities