| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $1.00e-5 per prompt token | $1.05e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes multi-turn conversations with improved instruction adherence through transformer-based attention mechanisms trained on instruction-tuning datasets. Supports up to 128K tokens of context (approximately 96K input + 32K output), enabling analysis of entire documents, codebases, or conversation histories in a single request without context truncation or sliding-window approximations.
Unique: 128K context window with improved instruction-following through reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) training, enabling coherent reasoning across entire documents without context loss — achieved through sparse attention patterns and hierarchical token processing rather than full quadratic attention
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo (4K) and comparable to Claude 2 (100K), but with faster inference latency and lower per-token cost for instruction-following tasks
Constrains model output to valid JSON format through post-processing validation and beam search constraints during token generation. When enabled, the model generates only syntactically valid JSON that matches a provided schema, eliminating the need for regex parsing or output repair logic in downstream applications.
Unique: Implements constraint-based token generation that prunes invalid JSON tokens during beam search, ensuring 100% valid JSON output without post-processing — uses a finite-state automaton to track valid JSON syntax states and only allows tokens that maintain validity
vs alternatives: More reliable than prompt-based JSON requests (which fail 5-15% of the time) and faster than Claude's native JSON mode because it uses tighter constraint checking during decoding rather than post-hoc validation
Enables the model to invoke multiple functions simultaneously in a single response through a structured function-calling protocol. The model generates a list of function calls with arguments, which are executed in parallel by the client, and results are fed back to the model for synthesis — supporting complex workflows that require coordinating multiple APIs or tools.
Unique: Supports parallel function invocation in a single turn through a structured function-call list format, allowing clients to execute multiple tools concurrently and aggregate results — uses a token-efficient schema representation that minimizes context overhead compared to sequential function calling
vs alternatives: Faster than sequential function calling (which requires multiple round-trips) and more flexible than hardcoded tool chains because the model dynamically decides which tools to invoke based on the prompt
Provides deterministic model outputs through a seed parameter that controls the random number generator used during token sampling. When the same seed is provided with identical inputs, the model generates identical outputs, enabling reproducible results for testing, debugging, and consistent behavior in production systems.
Unique: Implements seed-based determinism by controlling the random number generator state during sampling, ensuring byte-for-byte identical outputs for identical inputs — uses a fixed random seed to initialize the softmax temperature sampling and top-k/top-p filtering
vs alternatives: More reliable than temperature=0 for reproducibility because it guarantees identical token selection across runs, whereas temperature=0 may still produce different outputs due to floating-point rounding in different environments
Processes images alongside text prompts to answer questions about visual content, perform OCR, analyze diagrams, and describe scenes. The model encodes images into visual tokens using a vision transformer backbone, then fuses them with text embeddings in the transformer for joint reasoning about image and text content.
Unique: Integrates a vision transformer encoder that converts images to visual tokens, which are then processed alongside text tokens in the same transformer architecture — enables joint reasoning about image and text without separate modality-specific branches
vs alternatives: More capable than GPT-4V for complex visual reasoning tasks and faster than Claude 3 Vision for OCR due to optimized image tokenization, but less accurate than specialized OCR tools like Tesseract for document extraction
Generates syntactically correct code in 40+ programming languages based on natural language descriptions, code comments, or partial code. Uses transformer-based code understanding trained on public repositories to predict the next tokens in a code sequence, supporting both completion (filling in missing code) and generation (writing code from scratch).
Unique: Trained on diverse public code repositories with instruction-tuning for code generation tasks, enabling context-aware completion that understands programming patterns and idioms — uses byte-pair encoding (BPE) tokenization optimized for code syntax
vs alternatives: More capable than GitHub Copilot for generating code from natural language descriptions and faster than Claude for multi-file refactoring due to optimized code tokenization, but less specialized than Codex for domain-specific code generation
Decomposes complex problems into step-by-step reasoning chains through prompting techniques that encourage the model to 'think aloud' before providing answers. The model generates intermediate reasoning steps, which improve accuracy on multi-step problems by allowing the transformer to allocate more computation to reasoning rather than direct answer prediction.
Unique: Implements chain-of-thought through prompting that encourages intermediate reasoning generation, leveraging the transformer's ability to allocate computation across tokens — the model learns to generate reasoning tokens that improve downstream answer accuracy through RLHF training on reasoning-heavy tasks
vs alternatives: More reliable than direct answer generation for complex problems (10-30% accuracy improvement on math and logic tasks) and more transparent than black-box reasoning, but slower and more expensive than single-step inference
The model has training data only up to December 2023, meaning it lacks knowledge of events, product releases, API changes, and research published after that date. Requests about current events or recent developments will produce outdated or hallucinated information, as the model cannot distinguish between pre-cutoff knowledge and post-cutoff speculation.
Unique: Training data cutoff at December 2023 creates a hard boundary in the model's knowledge — the model cannot distinguish between pre-cutoff facts and post-cutoff speculation, leading to confident hallucinations about recent events
vs alternatives: Similar knowledge cutoff to GPT-4 (April 2023 for base model) but more recent than earlier GPT-3.5 versions; requires RAG augmentation for current information, unlike search-augmented models like Perplexity or Bing Chat
+1 more capabilities
GLM-5.1 executes multi-step coding tasks over extended timeframes without requiring human intervention between steps, using an internal planning mechanism that decomposes complex objectives into sub-tasks and maintains execution state across sequential operations. Unlike minute-level interaction models that require prompting after each step, this capability enables the model to autonomously navigate decision trees, handle errors, and adapt strategy based on intermediate results without context resets.
Unique: Designed specifically for minute+ autonomous execution windows rather than single-turn interactions; maintains internal execution state and decision-making across extended task horizons without requiring external orchestration or re-prompting between steps
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude for long-horizon coding tasks because it's architected for continuous autonomous operation rather than stateless request-response cycles
GLM-5.1 generates and refactors code with awareness of the full codebase structure, dependencies, and patterns, using semantic understanding of how changes in one file propagate to others. The model analyzes import graphs, function signatures, and usage patterns across files to ensure generated code maintains consistency and doesn't introduce breaking changes, rather than treating each file in isolation.
Unique: Maintains semantic awareness of codebase structure and cross-file dependencies during generation, enabling it to make coordinated changes across multiple files rather than treating each file independently
vs alternatives: Produces more consistent multi-file refactorings than Copilot or Claude because it reasons about the entire codebase context simultaneously rather than file-by-file
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 scores higher at 24/100 vs OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo Preview at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5.1 diagnoses errors and bugs by analyzing error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and suggest fixes. The model correlates error symptoms with likely causes, explains why errors occur, and provides specific debugging steps or code fixes.
Unique: Diagnoses errors by correlating symptoms with root causes using semantic understanding of code and error patterns, providing explanations and fixes rather than just pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at diagnosing subtle bugs than search-based solutions because it reasons about code semantics and error causality
GLM-5.1 identifies performance bottlenecks in code and suggests optimizations with specific implementation guidance, analyzing algorithms, data structures, and resource usage to recommend improvements. The model understands performance implications of different approaches and can suggest algorithmic or architectural changes to improve efficiency.
Unique: Suggests optimizations based on algorithmic and architectural analysis rather than just code-level tweaks, understanding performance implications of different approaches
vs alternatives: Provides more meaningful performance guidance than generic LLMs because it understands algorithm complexity and can suggest structural improvements
GLM-5.1 analyzes code for security vulnerabilities including injection attacks, authentication/authorization issues, cryptographic weaknesses, and data exposure risks, providing specific remediation guidance. The model understands common vulnerability patterns and security best practices to identify risks and suggest secure implementations.
Unique: Identifies security vulnerabilities through semantic analysis of code patterns and provides remediation guidance based on security best practices, not just pattern matching against known CVEs
vs alternatives: More effective at finding context-specific security issues than SAST tools because it understands code intent and can suggest secure implementations
GLM-5.1 performs step-by-step reasoning about code behavior by internally simulating or tracing execution paths, allowing it to predict runtime behavior, identify bugs, and explain code logic without requiring actual execution. This capability uses chain-of-thought-like reasoning applied specifically to code semantics, tracking variable state, control flow, and function call sequences to reason about correctness.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning specifically to code semantics and execution paths, enabling it to predict runtime behavior and identify subtle bugs through symbolic execution simulation rather than pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at finding subtle logic bugs than GPT-4 because it explicitly traces execution state rather than relying on pattern recognition
GLM-5.1 maintains rich context across multiple conversation turns when working on code, remembering previous edits, design decisions, and constraints without requiring users to re-specify them. The model builds an internal model of the codebase state and user intent that persists across turns, enabling iterative refinement where each turn builds on previous work rather than starting fresh.
Unique: Maintains stateful context across turns specifically optimized for code collaboration, remembering design decisions and codebase state without explicit memory structures
vs alternatives: Provides better iterative code refinement than stateless models because it retains context about previous edits and design intent across turns
GLM-5.1 translates natural language specifications into code that preserves semantic intent, handling ambiguous or underspecified requirements by inferring reasonable implementations based on context and common patterns. The model uses semantic understanding of both natural language and code to bridge the gap between high-level intent and low-level implementation details.
Unique: Translates natural language to code with explicit semantic fidelity checking, inferring reasonable implementations for underspecified requirements rather than producing literal or incomplete code
vs alternatives: Handles ambiguous requirements better than Copilot because it uses semantic reasoning to infer intent rather than pattern matching against training data
+5 more capabilities